The local option tax is capped so
wealthy districts do not have an unfair advantage over poorer ones.
But Oklahoma is one of only 10 states with negative wealth - neutrality scores, meaning that, on average, property - poor districts actually have more state and local revenue for education than
wealthy districts do.
Nevada is one of only 10 states with negative wealth - neutrality scores, meaning that, on average, property - poor districts actually have more state and local revenue for education than
wealthy districts do.
He cited the explanation given by a wealthy district for its request to back out of a cross-busing plan with a poor district:
The wealthy district did not want to integrate with the poor district because of the latter's «old and dilapidated buildings, lack of adequate equipment and materials, [and] lack of science programs.»
He says if Syosset and other wealthy districts didn't spend so much on their schools — if they cut some of their impressive programs and high salaries — they would not have to collect so much in taxes.
Not exact matches
The existing Foundation Aid Formula
does not properly calculate the local contribution and has too many floors, ceilings, phase - ins, and add - ons that distort the final aid distribution, driving too much funding to
wealthy districts.5 The Executive Budget imposes an additional calculation on top of the existing distributions and increases funding to all
districts including those that are affluent and not in need of further State support.
West Genesee doesn't have the extras that
wealthier Downstate
districts enjoy, such as Long Island's Syosset schools, where kindergartners learn Russian and high schoolers can be trained by Metropolitan Opera coaches.
He also claims that New York's education budget is too high, without noting that because of the wide disparities of income in the state, children in
wealthy districts benefit from much higher spending and students in poorer
districts have to make
do with far fewer resources.
It should be a budget imperative for a state as
wealthy as ours, even if it means irritating high - resource school
districts which won't
do as well, and the Republicans who love them.
Equity: Arkansas has a positive wealth - neutrality score, meaning that, on average, property -
wealthy districts have slightly more revenue than poor
districts do.
The state's score is positive, meaning that, on average,
wealthy districts in the state have more revenue than
do property - poor
districts.
«We cant
do the same as Simsbury [a
wealthy suburban
district] and get the same results,» she said.
His diocese, which covers 40 schools in three counties that run the gamut from
wealthy to downright impoverished, recently centralized all operations under three professionals experienced in
doing all the things required to run a healthy school
district: marketing, financial management and fundraising.
Not only
does Rocketship outperform nearby schools, but its schools also outperform
wealthier California school
districts, such as the Palo Alto Unified School
District.
Until three years ago, Beloit, a relatively
wealthy district in north central6Kansas, didn't receive one penny from the state through the equalization formula.
Wealthy families can send their kids to prestigious prep schools like Choate, Loomis, or Hotchkiss while families who don't have the same resources are often relegated to the
district schools in their cities and towns, even if they're not working for their kids.
In fact, in a study of a project - based approach to teaching social studies and content literacy to 2nd graders, my colleagues and I were able to close the gap, statistically speaking, between students in high - poverty school
districts — who experienced project - based units — and students in
wealthy school
districts — who
did not.
Reliance upon supplemental funding through bonds and overrides disadvantages schools; while
wealthy districts may be able to generate additional resources, they don't always have community support and underprivileged communities — serving Latino students in particular — often don't take the risk due to the little reward.
The contemporary debates about equity and sharing of property tax revenue often overlook the fact that
wealthy districts in most cases
did not create their own wealth.
An interesting observation in Texas is that some of the state's
wealthy districts had originally proposed that money
did not make much difference but later complained that limited funding
did not enable them to provide an adequate level of education for their students, especially their special needs students.
The state was joined by Montgomery County, the
wealthiest district in the state, and hired noted economist Eric Hanushek to testify that money doesn't make a difference in student outcomes.
Nearly 9 in 10 respondents said it was a problem for public schools in low - income communities to have fewer qualified teachers than public schools in
wealthier areas, and a majority felt that shortages should not be resolved by recruiting individuals who are not fully prepared — the very thing many
districts have been forced to
do in response to deep shortages across the state.
It doesn't happen often in
wealthy districts, but it
does happen elsewhere.
In
district - level analysis, the Education Trust finds that nationally
districts serving high concentrations of low - income students receive on average $ 1,200 less in state and local funding than
districts that serve low concentrations of low - income students, and that gap widens to $ 2,000 when comparing high - minority and low - minority
districts.17 These findings are further reflected by national funding equity measures reported by Education Week, which indicate that
wealthy school
districts spend more per student than poorer school
districts do on average.18
Judge Moukawsher
did highlight the inequities in
wealthy versus poor
districts in Connecticut.