if the wealthiest individuals and companies are doing something, then shouldn't a less
wealthy person consider it also?
if the wealthiest individuals and companies are doing something, then shouldn't a less
wealthy person consider it also?
Not exact matches
In his humorous but pointed book Confessions of a Workaholic, Wayne Oates has summarized much of our modern belief in these words: «The workaholic's way of life is
considered in America to be at one and the same time (a) a religious virtue, (b) a form of patriotism, (c) the way to win friends and influence
people, and (d) the way to be healthy,
wealthy, and wise.
Consider, for example, the two tax exemptions for capital gains which benefit
wealthy people and large corporations.
(One of the reasons the founding fathers were adamant all Americans would have freedom of whorship) It's too simplistic to say the English reformation happened because Henry 8th wanted a divorce, it happened because of the influence of Martin Luther and the rise of Protestants in Europe and because the Catholic Church had become too powerfull,
wealthy and corrupt and did not hesitate to burn
people it
considered Heritics, In England Guy Fawkes Day is celebrated as the foiling of a terrible plot to kill the king, James the 1st and most of the parliament.
Top Senate Republicans
considered keeping President Barack Obama's tax increase on
wealthier people's investments and using the money to bolster their proposed health care subsidies in a bid to mollify moderate GOP lawmakers and salvage the party's struggling bill.
A wholesale transfer of capital from the
wealthy to the
people through nationalisation of infrastructure assets is unlikely, but there are other areas at the margins where Ed's team are actively
considering significant market intervention in the interests of redistribution (or «solving the cost of living crisis», as Labour's tired mantra has it).
In particular, Caproni criticized Bharara's characterization of Albany — «politicians are supposed to be on the
people's payroll, not on secret retainer to
wealthy special interests they do favors for» — saying that it could be
considered «a commentary on the character or guilt of the defendant.»
The number of
people in Bangladesh dying from chronic diseases such as cancer, diabetes and hypertension — long
considered diseases of the
wealthy because the poor didn't tend to live long enough to develop them — increased dramatically among the nation's poorest households over a 24 - year period, suggests new research from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Instead,
people in
wealthier countries should
consider adopting «lifestyle and behavioural changes» to reduce the size of their carbon footprints, he adds, in order to offset the extra carbon cost of ending poverty.
What some
people consider to be a disturbing trend is actually proving to be advantageous to a lot of
wealthy men and younger women from across the globe.
If you are among those
wealthy individuals looking for a
person to date with then this online dating site is simply the best option to
consider.
He is
considered to be the
wealthiest person in New York, whose reported net worth is north of $ 33 billion, could certainly afford to acquire a publicly traded media company with a market capitalization of a mere $ 2 billion — even if he had to pay a substantial premium.
The Osage were
considered the
wealthiest people per capita in the world.
Second, if a strategy is deemed universally beneficial to the
wealthy, perhaps it is advisable for a less
wealthy person to
consider it as a way to build wealth.
[For some, I guess failure on the first attribute actually leads to failure on the second...] Then we have to
consider if these
people are
wealthier and / or highly educated, for example, do they lead healthier lives & what contribution does that actually make to their LE?
This enemy is probably one that most
people don't even
consider until they're fairly
wealthy.
In short, and you've heard TreeHugger and many others say it before, but it bears repeating: There are simply not enough resources on the planet to extend what is
considered a normal, even essential, level of material consumption in
wealthy nations to a planet with 6 billion and growing
people: Resource Use Increasing Faster Than Population
Consider some stats.
Many
people believe that prenuptial agreements are only for the very
wealthy, but anyone with assets, children from a prior relationship, or a partner with debts may want to
consider signing a prenuptial agreement before getting married.
Second, if a strategy is deemed universally beneficial to the
wealthy, perhaps it is advisable for a less
wealthy person to
consider it as a way to build wealth.
I always
considered Apple akin to a Porsche (in the car world), whereas the engineering is fantastic but not worth the money for most
people unless you're
wealthy.