Features like the missing day / night and weather cycle don't really matter.
Not exact matches
A wintry sort of spirituality
does not literally trace the
cycles of the seasons and is not a
weather report or an observation on the climate.
Even if you're in a place where the
weather doesn't change much, there's comfort in knowing that nature's
cycles continue to pass through our lives no matter what else is going on.
The U.S. press is either woefully ignorant of the state of the science, or is deliberately trying to find explanations for various regional
weather and climate changes that don't involve any mention of «global warming» — and that approach relies on the «natural
cycle» argument.
We also live in tropical climate, and a month or two ago when the
weather was cooler we
did almost a 24 hour
cycle but since then my kefir is ready after 12 - 15 hours.
I would also look into my favorite type of glove that I wear when I'm
doing cold
weather cycling or skate skiing or anything where I've got to have my hands out there in the elements.
Whether I'm running, walking, swimming or
cycling, I love working out in the open air and have never let the cold winter
weather stop me (well, unless its under 3o degrees outside, then I don't go...
The series draws on real - world events like seasons, day and night
cycles, holidays etc. but I could imagine Animal Crossing mobile
doing things that might have been more difficult on consoles, like pulling local
weather data to reflect it in - game, or making use of GPS tracking to move between cities.
I'd like to understand why the compressor
did not
cycle off in today's hotter
weather, especially when I finally got the cabin cooled down a bit.
Assassin's Creed 3
did day night and
weather cycles pretty well.
There are no dynamic events giving the world a more realistic feel; there is no day / night
cycle or
weather system; while the NPCs
do roam around a bit (and will panic or alert the police if they notice you
doing something you shouldn't), they're clearly not following proper schedules of their own.
Gran Turismo Sport
does not offer the same dynamic
weather system and day - night
cycle that was present in Gran Turismo 6.
Since you spend a lot of time on each map (one in Afghanistan, the other in central Africa), the game
does run the risk of being repetitive, but I feel that since the conditions are always changing —
weather, guard shifts, guard tactics and gear, a steady night - and - day
cycle, «holy crap, when
did they bring a tank here, this is out in the middle of nowhere» — I feel like you're never handling the same outpost the same way twice.
The series draws on real - world events like seasons, day and night
cycles, holidays etc. but I could imagine Animal Crossing mobile
doing things that might have been more difficult on consoles, like pulling local
weather data to reflect it in - game, or making use of GPS tracking to move between cities.
pat - «Similarly many environmental activists believe that man's influence is a form of sin and nature (Gaea) will soon strike back...» You can phrase the position of a fictitious group any way you want of course, without rebuttal, because they don't really exist, though there are people who fit the description — especially if by «many» you mean more than three — but the more accurate reality is most of the human beings you would lump under the rubric «environmentalist» would more accurately be described as believing that short - sighted and greedy human attempts at total control and domination and complete disregard for the healthof the environment have gotten us out of balance with what was an interlocking web of balanced and dynamic systems, and would appear to have unbalanced many of those systems as well, including the still poorly understood
cycles of climate; or
weather, as we laymen call it.
You must not
do any real studying if you've never heard about the evolution of the Earth's atmosphere through biosphere changes and oxygenation, plate tectonics / silicate
weathering, milankovitch
cycles, solar activity and volcanic eruptions, among other things.
We know that when James Hansen made his famous predictions to congress in 1988 that he didn't know he was comparing a period, which was in the warm end of a sixty year PDO
weather cycle with periods in the cool end.
This article published on Space.com
does show the 1500 year solar
cycle does indeed affect world wide
weather and with the last mini-ice age just 600 years ago it would seem logical that we are getting nearer to a warming temperature peak and thus world wide avgerage atmospheric temperature that is quoted so often «Should Be Rising» now and for the next 100 to 300 years.
I know in general terms that the hydrological
cycle should intensify with warming and that one event is hard to pin on climate change, but it would be good to
do a catch up on how the broad trend of extreme
weather fits the models.
In reality if this climate change bill doesn't go into effect we still will go through A 20 colder
cycle.IT»S A
CYCLE PEOPLE.WE CA N'T CONTROL
WEATHER.
And
weather scientists
do see a possible relationship between the
weather phenomenon known as La Nina and the tornado outbreak, and some in the
weather world are exploring whether climate change is causing a disruption in the El Nino / La Nina
cycle.
The models, however rigorous, can produce only predictions — and how much
do we know about long
weather cycles after all?
Do scientists know enough to separate human factors from the numerous, powerful, interrelated solar, cosmic, oceanic, terrestrial and other forces that have repeatedly caused minor to major climate changes, climate
cycles and
weather events throughout human and geologic history?
And in the real world this is exactly what
does heat up the land and water at the equator to give us our huge equator to poles wind system and our dramatic convected
weather, our storms, our monsoons, our water
cycle.
Sea levels rise and fall partly as a result of thermal expansion and contraction, and partly to
do with water vapour, the water
cycle, cloud levels and
weather conditions in general.
The principal reason is that water vapor has a short
cycle in the atmosphere (a few days) before it is incorporated into
weather events and falls to Earth, so it can not build up in the atmosphere in the same way as carbon dioxide
does.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said in 2007 that computer model projections
did not indicate the
weather cycle's strength or frequency would alter during the 21st century.
So no matter how many record warming years you have according to the simple
weather or yearly
cycles estimations, or how many such record years you may «produce», it
does not really mean anything in climate terms,............... that is why these crazy records make not even a dent to the plateau or the hiatus... or put another way....
However, despite all that, the
weather systems combined with the hydrological
cycle and the global air circulation guided by the sea surface temperatures
do provide reasonable overall stability for eons at a time by neutralising many potentially disruptive natural and biologically induced variables affecting air temperature.
He says to take examples from real world, (as he's
done with the example of packets of air rising which is already well known and which is what gives us our
weather), but on a non-rotating Earth it's the difference of temperature provided by the Sun between the equator and the poles which sets up the basic pattern of packets of air on the move (which is wind, wind is volumes of air on the move) from the equator to the poles where they cool and are drawn back to the equator where the heating
cycle begins again.
He told WND, very simply, that
weather does change over time and that the global system goes through
cycles, some slightly warmer and some slightly cooler than others.
So, they don't have wind and
weather, they have no volume of gases to convect and they don't have separation of gases by weight under gravity, they don't have the water
cycle, they don't have rain in the carbon
cycle, they don't have heat transfer by convection, they don't have sound.
The principal reason is that water vapor has a short
cycle in the atmosphere (10 days on average) before it is incorporated into
weather events and falls to Earth, so it can not build up in the atmosphere in the same way as carbon dioxide
does.
(see map here) Because of the safety and the
weather protection, people afraid of city
cycling might
do it instead of driving.
When
done so, proxy records and climate models indicate that the response to past global warming was profound, with evidence for global reorganisation of the hydrological
cycle and profound local increases and decreases in rainfall; combined with elevated temperatures and terrestrial vegetation change, this appears to often result in warming - enhanced soil organic matter oxidation, chemical
weathering and nutrient
cycling.
In case you don't know, a velomobile is an enclosed human - powered
cycle whose outer shell reduces drag and defends the rider from inclement
weather.
While winter
cycling brings up some of the same issues as wet - or hot -
weather riding (like wearing something that you can change out of when you get to work so you don't end up in those ice - crusted pants at your 9 a.m. meeting), it also offers challenges that are all its own.
Random
weather variability means that a cooling from 10 - 17 April
does not falsify the seasonal
cycle, nor would a warming verify it in any way, because the time period is just too short.
Bad
weather, horrible cold and flu season, the depressing 24 hour news
cycle, even the boost from the Olympics doesn't last very long - other people's exercise and triumphs can get irritating too.