Sentences with phrase «weather data do»

Actual weather data do not support that storyline either.

Not exact matches

Jeff Masters, a meteorologist at The Weather Company who cofounded the weather - data website Weather Underground, recommended evacuating only if local emergency experts said to do so.

And by robust, Zuckerberg doesn't mean the entire world will be streaming House of Cards on Netflix, but people in developing countries may be willing to pay for add - on services like weather and food pricing data.

Instead, O'Reilly suggested that the U.S. government make it easy for entrepreneurs to develop applications that improve or enhance things it already does — in the same way that privately owned weather websites use data from the National Weather Service.

BUSINESS INSIDER: To what extent do you think poor weather has impacted this winter's economic data?

But using data from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration's National Temperature Index (NTI), we found that cold weather during the winter months (December, January and February) does not have a meaningful implication for stock market returns.

When problems do occur, you may see current data on the weather page that is a little out of date.

«Currently, we don't have the detailed workforce data necessary in order to ensure the most effective, cohesive workforce development strategy,» said ECIDA President and CEO Steve Weathers.

Droegemeier does not expect Bridenstine to support slashing the agency's budget, especially given that much of NASA's mission can be framed in terms of collecting data that are as applicable to understanding weather patterns as to understanding climate change.

«The idea of using microwaves or electromagnetic radiation to predict weather conditions is not new,» Messer - Yaron says, but this is the first time someone has used free data to do it.

Modern weather radar contains even more information than 1995 systems did, he notes — and farmers can use that data to their advantage.

«Germany has some very good modellers who are already doing a nice job without the real - time data that we have,» says Sue Haupt, who oversees weather - system research at NCAR.

The military satellites can probably survive well beyond 2012, although they do not provide all the data NOAA needs for its weather - forecasting models.

But data from weather balloons and satellites don't match the projections.

My main problem with that study is that the weather models don't use any forcings at all — no changes in ozone, CO2, volcanos, aerosols, solar etc. — and so while some of the effects of the forcings might be captured (since the weather models assimilate satellite data etc.), there is no reason to think that they get all of the signal — particularly for near surface effects (tropospheric ozone for instance).

Did data provided by geologist got mixed in with weather records?

The series draws on real - world events like seasons, day and night cycles, holidays etc. but I could imagine Animal Crossing mobile doing things that might have been more difficult on consoles, like pulling local weather data to reflect it in - game, or making use of GPS tracking to move between cities.

Accessing features such as radio, apps, and navigation, or data such as weather information, can be done with a press of your fingertips.

However, unlike many other cars that include weather and traffic data, the LaCrosse did not have a fuel prices app or the (less useful) stocks or sports scores apps.

Plus, the NextOne also does the usual smartwatch stuff, including delivering notifications, handling data from compatible third party apps like displaying weather information, and more.

The series draws on real - world events like seasons, day and night cycles, holidays etc. but I could imagine Animal Crossing mobile doing things that might have been more difficult on consoles, like pulling local weather data to reflect it in - game, or making use of GPS tracking to move between cities.

For an example of how that «citizen science» can really work, look at what Ron Broberg and Zeke Hausfeather are doing with the weather station data — they aren't sitting around declaring that «it can't be done» or that the GISTEMP / CRU / NCDC methods are fixed, they are going into the data, making choices, seeing what impact they have and determining what is robust.

While this methodology doesn't eliminate your point that the trends from different periods in the observed record (or from different observed datasets) fall at various locations within our model - derived 95 % confidence range (clearly they do), it does provide justification for using the most recent data to show that sometimes (including currently), the observed trends (which obviously contain natural variability, or, weather noise) push the envelop of model trends (which also contain weather noise).

But data from weather balloons and satellites don't match the projections.

A national center is appropriate to host major super computers, data centers, instrumented aircraft, radars and other instruments, community weather and climate models, and teams of scientists working together on large problems that are difficult to do in single universities.

I just did a quick regression analysis (using Excel) of the Quatsino, B.C. weather data.

On the frequency of the storms, I note that the weather really didn't change much during Dec 04 and part of Jan 05 such that you had four distinct spots in the oceans at 90 intervals in the Southern hemisphere that showed substantial chilling compared to historical data.

Thus the weather forecasting centers started to do «re-analyses» in the 1990s — which involved going back over the older data and running it with the most up - to - date forecasting model.

The study, combining data from observed storms with a variety of climate simulations, did not extend beyond 1999 and so does not assess more recent extreme weather events.

«They had done far more extensive and sophisticated analysis of the weather records, confirmed by «proxy» data such as studies of tree rings and measurements of old temperatures that lingered in deep boreholes.»

Why does my local weather service not accept my data?

Selecting the statistical method first is fine, but in most weather and climate research even if you do there is insufficient data.

Research activity did accelerate using state - of - the - art computers, international programs to assemble weather data, and adventurous expeditions across oceans and ice caps to gather information on past climates.

But just as Obama's climate - change cronies turn a blind eye to factual weather data, so do they ignore the need for reliable access to energy.

By contrast, atmospheric temperatures measured from weather satellites show only insignificant warming between 1978 and 1997 — as do the independent data from weather balloons around the world.

Do deniers deny weather balloon results, or satellite data, or ice cores?

Whether this source is NOAA, foreign weather observatories, or international climate bodies is irrelevant — the author is never a primary source of data unless he is performing experiments, and anyone who has done real science understands this.

That what is being done with climate weather station data is combining a whole lot of very unequal data sets.

At Oroville, the manual cites weather patterns prior to the 1950s, and data doesn't account for the catastrophic floods of 1986 and 1997.»

But weather balloon observations (including the NOAA data set) do not indicate cloud cover fraction.

Project 5: 5a) Event attribution with CMIP5 data 5b) How does climate change alter the distribution of weather?

It can not be done from the weather balloon data; it can be separated out only from the satellite data where clouds are visible.

One of the limits of climatology is that we only have about a hundred years of scientifically gathered weather data, and we know that they don't give us the full story.

The work some were doing exposed the limitations of the data and the computer models ability to create accurate weather maps.

First, you would think that they would want the very best data possible, but they don't seem to care that government weather sensors are horribly compromised by heat sources.

Thousands of weather stations data around the world show a warming Earth, I don't care what it's doing far above my head.

What do warmers such as Hanson / Giss do, well, they compare data from a highly UHI contaminated urban city weather station with CLEAN data from a neighbouring RURAL station.

Scientists do not have a good sense of the current trends, because until a few years ago, data came from only a few ground - based weather stations.

But the data don't show any trend in extreme weather events in the U.S. for decades.

Erasing empirical temperature records, attributing extreme weather events to global warming without any data, yet you probably find their actions to be fine, regardless of the harm they have done.