Even as recent as 2003, the United States National Research Council released a report stating that to date, there is still no convincing scientific proof of the efficacy of intentional
weather modification as it only has 30 percent or less chance of success.
Found lots of good stuff, but in particular were the McNamara Report (Oct 1966) and the senate records etc showing we first used
weather modification as a weapon of war in 1968.
Not exact matches
First,
modification of individual hurricanes would fall under the topic of
weather modification, rather than climate geoengineering; and second, there is not nearly
as much research on [hurricane
modification]
as on the possible effects of climate geoengineering on slowing the melting of ice sheets.
State governments often license and regulate
weather modification activities such
as cloud seeding.
How can an article such
as this fail to take immediately into account, in the first paragraph, that massive
weather modifications (with HAARP) are scrambling traditional patterns and bending the jet stream into an advanced yoga posture.
I scanned cover to cover in this month's issue and
as usual there is nary one single, solitary article that has anything even remotely to do with climate change or global warming, much less geoengineering or
weather modification.
Patented processes of «chemical ice nucleation for
weather modification» (a primary aspect of climate engineering operations) will likely cause considerable surface icing scenarios
as these materials reach ground level.
Stop Geoengineering Minnesota has brought suit in United States District Court for the District of Columbia against the Department of Commerce,
as well
as against NOAA, for the failure to respond to requests for information regarding
weather modification under a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request.
I can't help but wonder if
weather modification is being used
as another method of culling the population.
This request will be repeated over the next time,
as it seems time not only from an historical perspective, and in honour of the veterans, but also to make the best out of the WWII disaster along which it might be possible to explain antrophogen
weather modification and climate change of considerable proportion,
as previously discussed at this site (October 2007), and which is reproduce hereafter, with few
modification:
Susan Ferguson, ContributorWaking Times Geoengineering, often referred to
as weather modification, is one of the most important issues of our time that almost no one is willing to talk about.
The theory galvanized with the release of a 1996 research paper by the U.S. Air Force about
weather modification titled «
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the
Weather in 2025.»
«Through our work at the NWSC, we have a better understanding of such important processes
as surface and subsurface hydrology, physics of flow in reservoir rock, and
weather modification and precipitation stimulation,» said William Gern, vice president of research and economic development at the University of Wyoming.
The very same governmental agencies that are named in this new «Obama Climate Change Memorandum» have already been involved in the
weather modification / climate engineering arena for over a half century
as historical presidential reports prove.
While the second option, also called albedo
modification, is relatively inexpensive and could quickly lower the planet's temperature, it could have unwanted effects on the Earth's
weather pattern, which could potentially bring drought to some regions or be used
as a weapon by governments or certain individuals.