My turn — 39
week elective inductions, early epidurals with both, formula fed, never co-slept (both babies slept in their rooms from birth which were on a different floor from mine), no baby - wearing, and I was back to work at 3 1/2 weeks at a 60 - 100 hour / week job.
Not exact matches
Several states have instructed their Medicaid office to review OB charts and if an
elective induction is found to have been done prior to 39
weeks 0 days they will recoup (ie, steal) the paultry payment and if such a pattern continues they will issue sanctions against the provider and the facility.
Looking behind the Curtain A recent study of
elective induction at term purports to show that it would reduce perinatal mortality without affecting spontaneous birth rates, although it would increase admission to a special neonatal care unit if done before 41
weeks, which contradicts the current belief that
elective delivery at 39
weeks poses no excess risk.
Other than furthering the schism between the medical and natural childbirth camps, news that
elective induction at 39
weeks prevents adverse outcomes could place a strain on hospitals.
Avoiding
elective induction of labor before 41 completed
weeks of gestation is a major recommendation.
Several hospital accreditation groups, such as Leapfrog and JCAHO, have introduced incentives for hospitals to reduce the number of
elective labor
inductions before 40
weeks.
Today we are taking a close look at a recently released research, the ARRIVE trial abstract that suggests
elective inductions at 39
weeks could reduce the cesarean rate.
In a study with more than 6,100 pregnant women across the country, researchers randomly assigned half of the women to an expectant management group (waiting for labor to begin on its own and intervening only if problems occur) and the other half to a group that would undergo an
elective induction (inducing labor without a medical reason) at 39
weeks of gestation.