Not exact matches
He called the current system of teacher evaluations «baloney,» and said
student test scores should be
weighed more heavily.
The draft also includes a space for the task force to
weigh in on the impact of
student test scores on teacher evaluations, and the panel will likely use that space to recommend up to a four - year moratorium, according to a source familiar with the task force's plans.
While different states
weigh and conduct the components differently, they, like New York, tie teacher performance only to
student growth, not raw
test scores, so as not to disadvantage teachers whose
students hail from challenging socioeconomic backgrounds versus teachers in wealthy districts.
For example, Ohio adjusts value - added calculations for high mobility, and Arizona calculates the percentage of
students enrolled for a full academic year and
weighs measures of
test score levels and growth differently based on
student mobility and length of enrollment.
For Charter Schools, school authorizers have
weighed very heavily the
test scores of
students in charter renewals.
California has identified English learners based on how well they do on the language development
test but has left it up to districts and
students» teachers to also
weigh a mix of factors, including teacher judgment,
scores on other standardized academic
tests and parent consultations.
And if so, how do you think those
students test scores should be
weighed in teacher evaluation?
The districts are still determining how to
weigh different measurements of
student performance, such as
test scores.
The civic group also endorsed including value - added analysis — a statistical method that links
student test scores to their teachers — in teacher performance reviews and cited a Times series on the subject as one reason they decided to
weigh in.