Not exact matches
Were
Nature's editors, the demographers Jay Olshansky and Jean - Marie Robine, and the third peer reviewer, strict, independent gatekeepers who
weighed the claims of each paper
against the many others?
I didn't think you were shilling, I was just surprised that you were posting on a site about primal nutrition, among other things, two things that go so entirely
against the essential
nature of primal eating:
weighing measuring and recording and eating such a huge percentage of carbs.
Amy Pleasant's exhibition «re / form,» at Whitespace Gallery through February 15, presents a lineage of human history and responses to issues of identity, from ancient to modern times, caused by
weighing one's role in society
against one's place in
nature.
[127] Professor Piché in her text Fairness in Class Action Settlements, supra at pp. 179 - 80 summarizes the various factors for the settlement approval test into seven factors; i.e.: (1) judicial risk analysis: likelihood of recovery, or likelihood of success on the merits
weighed against amount and form of settlement relief; (2) future expense, complexity and likely duration of litigation; (3) class reaction: number and
nature of objections; (4) recommendations and experience of counsel and opinion of interested persons; (5) adequacy of representation: good faith and absence of collusion; (6) discovery evidence sufficient for «effective representation» and (7) adequacy of notice of proposed settlement to absent class members.