Under state law, the death penalty can be imposed if a jury makes a unanimous recommendation after
weighing aggravating factors presented by the prosecution and mitigating factors presented by the defense.
Under state law, the death penalty can be imposed if a jury makes a unanimous recommendation after
weighing aggravating factors presented by the prosecution and mitigating factors presented by the defense.
Not exact matches
The judge in the case will
weigh both mitigating (
factors that work in the favor of the accused) against
aggravating factors (
factors that work against the accused) to determine a just and fit sentence for the crime committed.
The judge will
weigh both the mitigating and
aggravating factors in the case when making sentencing decisions.
Additionally, the court is required to
weigh the mitigating and
aggravating factors in the case prior to imposing a sentence.
If at least one
aggravating factor exists, the Court then must see how it
weighs against the mitigating
factors.
The court is required to
weigh all relevant
aggravating and mitigating
factors in the case in order to determine a just sentence for the accused.
Despite recognizing that some other courts have reached a different conclusion, the Ohio Supreme Court held that jury's
weighing of
aggravating circumstances against mitigating
factors is not a fact - finding process, so it is not governed by Hurst, but even if it were, there was no violation because Ohio law requires the jury to unanimously agree that
aggravating circumstances outweigh mitigating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt before the trial judge can consider imposing a death sentence.