Many ethics courses are one or two credit hours, less
weight than science - based courses.
Not exact matches
I know way more
than you can imagine both about spirituality and about
science through both study and experience so I don't throw stuff out that doesn't carry the
weight of some kind of objectivity.
I will submit that though no decisive falsification is possible, the cumulative
weight of evidence does count for or against religious beliefs, but with greater ambiguity
than in
science.
His decisions will be based on his religious beliefs rather
than science — or at least he'll give them equal
weight.
The research, which suggests a more complex relationship among such factors as physical activity, nutrition,
weight management, fitness and health
than previously believed, is published the December 2010 journal Medicine &
Science in Sports & Exercise.
They found that infants born within 1 kilometer of a well were 25 % more likely to have low birth
weights (less
than 2500 grams or 5.5 pounds)
than infants more
than 3 kilometers away, they report today in
Science Advances.
The spectacle of someone that smart dropping down through the
weight classes to make a scientific pronouncement that could have been made by an untrained man drinking whiskey in front of the television struck me as, well, slightly unfair to those of us forced to try to make a living in the cutthroat and less - lucrative -
than - you - might - think field of Easy / Obvious
Science.
Throwing its massive
weight behind
science communication is the University of Texas, which graduates more Ph.D. s
than any other U.S. university.
Even on a smooth surface, the sucker has serious sticking power too, withstanding forces trying to rip it off equivalent to more
than 340 times its own
weight (
Science Robotics, doi.org/cdff).
These vehicles offer more performance and capacity
than earlier Atlas and Delta boosters for extra
weight and
science instruments to be sent skyward.
Add to that the fact that finding * any * written materials about Bright Line is difficult, that
weight loss is a very emotional subject for some people, and that there's still no
science corroborating it in any peer - reviewed publication — and BLE starts to look a lot more like the strategies good MLM schemes use
than the products you usually recommend.
«Fat is more important
than weight,» says Peter Katzmarzyk, associate executive director for population
science at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, La. «Excessive fatness is the definition of obesity, not excessive
weight — and having too much fat can cause serious health problems.»
In fact, some research in 2007 actually showed milk to produce a greater anabolic response after
weight training
than a store - bought bodybuilding supplement... sort of a slap in the face for all those companies pushing «metabolic optimizers» and supplement «stacks» based on «modern
science» and nutrition theory.
The
science on a Low - Fat Diet has also shown that it's not any more effective for
weight loss
than any other low calorie diet.
According to a study published in a 2010 edition of «Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise,» athletes with higher protein intakes during short - term, reduced - calorie
weight loss diets maintained more lean muscle mass
than subjects who consumed less protein.
This stuff isn't exactly rocket
science: eat more
than you burn to gain
weight, eat less to lose.
Aim to complete more
than 250 minutes of aerobic exercise weekly — equivalent to more
than 50 minutes, five days weekly — for effective
weight loss, suggest authors of a review published in 2009 in «Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise.»
It gives people the satisfaction of believing they're doing something good for their bodies, but
science shows that it's not healthier or better for
weight loss
than a traditional diet.
«These findings add to our understanding of how childhood stress is a more important driver of long - term
weight gain
than adult stress, and how such processes differ for men and women,» said Hui Liu, MSU associate professor of sociology and an expert in statistics, population - based health and family
science.
Science tells us that we lose
weight when we burn more calories
than we consume, so if performing cardio helps with that equation, then sure, it's advisable.
Key Features: Controls bad breath with delmopinol, an ingredient used for years in human oral rinses Clinically proven to reduces plaque and calculus in dogs in more
than 3 dozen rigorous human and animal clinical trials Low - calorie formula does not negatively impact your dog's body
weight or eating habits Block plaque, calculus, and halitosis with the
science of prevention.
I have tried every food on the market, lately I have been giving him
Science Diet wet Dog Food, this is working better
than the dry food, but he still throws up, not as much though... I brought him to the vet she said his
weight was fine and told me to give him a Pepcid every a.m. this helped a little also.
The Wallace et al. 2016 study represents a new and interesting approach to climate
science research which should yield very interesting and much more valid results since the
weight given to each likely variable is determined by available evidence rather
than the guesses of carefully selected «experts» and incorporated into their largely arbitrary computer models.
From the perspective of the International Climate
Science Coalition, this book, «Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change» is worth far more
than its
weight in gold.
Worth far more
than its
weight in gold By Tom Harris, president, International Climate
Science Coalition
They would much rather talk about probabilities and
weighted risk assessments
than explain how climate
science has solved a very simple equation (with very complicated
science) over a critical period in our history when CO2 emissions from fossil fuels have risen rapidly.
Your opinion about the
science of climate change is no different
than any amatuer and I would not give you any more
weight than any other non-expert.
Observation The light -
weight fluff that GWPF / Peter Lee are spewing sure is a lot less challenging
than foresighted
science - respecting reason - and - action, eh Climate Etc readers?
«n its recent review of the IPCC, the InterAcademy Council (IAC)-- an umbrella group for the world's
science academies — highlighted a case in the 2007 assessment where studies projecting rapidly declining crop yields in Africa were given more
weight than they merited, in the absence of supporting evidence.
In fact it's gives even more
weight to grassroots action: More
than ever pressure needs to be put on governments (wherever you happen to live) to enact strong national emissions targets, based in
science not political expediency.
It is about 100 times stronger
than steel by
weight, making it the thinnest and strongest substance known to
science.
It's taken four years of secret scientific research to investigate the
science of hair from root to tip, looking at 1010 miles of real human hair, and # 50 million in development to bring us a hair dryer that is said to have a motor that is eight times faster
than other hair dryers and half the
weight * They tested the product on different hair types and built test rigs which mechanically simulate hair drying techniques — which can differ around the world.