Sentences with phrase «weight than science»

Many ethics courses are one or two credit hours, less weight than science - based courses.

Not exact matches

I know way more than you can imagine both about spirituality and about science through both study and experience so I don't throw stuff out that doesn't carry the weight of some kind of objectivity.
I will submit that though no decisive falsification is possible, the cumulative weight of evidence does count for or against religious beliefs, but with greater ambiguity than in science.
His decisions will be based on his religious beliefs rather than science — or at least he'll give them equal weight.
The research, which suggests a more complex relationship among such factors as physical activity, nutrition, weight management, fitness and health than previously believed, is published the December 2010 journal Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
They found that infants born within 1 kilometer of a well were 25 % more likely to have low birth weights (less than 2500 grams or 5.5 pounds) than infants more than 3 kilometers away, they report today in Science Advances.
The spectacle of someone that smart dropping down through the weight classes to make a scientific pronouncement that could have been made by an untrained man drinking whiskey in front of the television struck me as, well, slightly unfair to those of us forced to try to make a living in the cutthroat and less - lucrative - than - you - might - think field of Easy / Obvious Science.
Throwing its massive weight behind science communication is the University of Texas, which graduates more Ph.D. s than any other U.S. university.
Even on a smooth surface, the sucker has serious sticking power too, withstanding forces trying to rip it off equivalent to more than 340 times its own weight (Science Robotics, doi.org/cdff).
These vehicles offer more performance and capacity than earlier Atlas and Delta boosters for extra weight and science instruments to be sent skyward.
Add to that the fact that finding * any * written materials about Bright Line is difficult, that weight loss is a very emotional subject for some people, and that there's still no science corroborating it in any peer - reviewed publication — and BLE starts to look a lot more like the strategies good MLM schemes use than the products you usually recommend.
«Fat is more important than weight,» says Peter Katzmarzyk, associate executive director for population science at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, La. «Excessive fatness is the definition of obesity, not excessive weight — and having too much fat can cause serious health problems.»
In fact, some research in 2007 actually showed milk to produce a greater anabolic response after weight training than a store - bought bodybuilding supplement... sort of a slap in the face for all those companies pushing «metabolic optimizers» and supplement «stacks» based on «modern science» and nutrition theory.
The science on a Low - Fat Diet has also shown that it's not any more effective for weight loss than any other low calorie diet.
According to a study published in a 2010 edition of «Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,» athletes with higher protein intakes during short - term, reduced - calorie weight loss diets maintained more lean muscle mass than subjects who consumed less protein.
This stuff isn't exactly rocket science: eat more than you burn to gain weight, eat less to lose.
Aim to complete more than 250 minutes of aerobic exercise weekly — equivalent to more than 50 minutes, five days weekly — for effective weight loss, suggest authors of a review published in 2009 in «Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise.»
It gives people the satisfaction of believing they're doing something good for their bodies, but science shows that it's not healthier or better for weight loss than a traditional diet.
«These findings add to our understanding of how childhood stress is a more important driver of long - term weight gain than adult stress, and how such processes differ for men and women,» said Hui Liu, MSU associate professor of sociology and an expert in statistics, population - based health and family science.
Science tells us that we lose weight when we burn more calories than we consume, so if performing cardio helps with that equation, then sure, it's advisable.
Key Features: Controls bad breath with delmopinol, an ingredient used for years in human oral rinses Clinically proven to reduces plaque and calculus in dogs in more than 3 dozen rigorous human and animal clinical trials Low - calorie formula does not negatively impact your dog's body weight or eating habits Block plaque, calculus, and halitosis with the science of prevention.
I have tried every food on the market, lately I have been giving him Science Diet wet Dog Food, this is working better than the dry food, but he still throws up, not as much though... I brought him to the vet she said his weight was fine and told me to give him a Pepcid every a.m. this helped a little also.
The Wallace et al. 2016 study represents a new and interesting approach to climate science research which should yield very interesting and much more valid results since the weight given to each likely variable is determined by available evidence rather than the guesses of carefully selected «experts» and incorporated into their largely arbitrary computer models.
From the perspective of the International Climate Science Coalition, this book, «Climate Change Reconsidered: 2011 Interim Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change» is worth far more than its weight in gold.
Worth far more than its weight in gold By Tom Harris, president, International Climate Science Coalition
They would much rather talk about probabilities and weighted risk assessments than explain how climate science has solved a very simple equation (with very complicated science) over a critical period in our history when CO2 emissions from fossil fuels have risen rapidly.
Your opinion about the science of climate change is no different than any amatuer and I would not give you any more weight than any other non-expert.
Observation The light - weight fluff that GWPF / Peter Lee are spewing sure is a lot less challenging than foresighted science - respecting reason - and - action, eh Climate Etc readers?
«n its recent review of the IPCC, the InterAcademy Council (IAC)-- an umbrella group for the world's science academies — highlighted a case in the 2007 assessment where studies projecting rapidly declining crop yields in Africa were given more weight than they merited, in the absence of supporting evidence.
In fact it's gives even more weight to grassroots action: More than ever pressure needs to be put on governments (wherever you happen to live) to enact strong national emissions targets, based in science not political expediency.
It is about 100 times stronger than steel by weight, making it the thinnest and strongest substance known to science.
It's taken four years of secret scientific research to investigate the science of hair from root to tip, looking at 1010 miles of real human hair, and # 50 million in development to bring us a hair dryer that is said to have a motor that is eight times faster than other hair dryers and half the weight * They tested the product on different hair types and built test rigs which mechanically simulate hair drying techniques — which can differ around the world.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z