I don't think all our efforts to get to greater understanding about what's going on in our planetary climate are all good or all bad, but I do think a lot of decsions are heavily impacted by the public's perception and the image of the bear swimming to oblivion, if that's in fact what happens, carries more
weight than scientific objectivity.
Not exact matches
The
weight of
scientific evidence for your belief is no greater
than the
scientific evidence for my beliefs.
So far, the
scientific literature shows that babies who lose greater
than 7 % of their birth
weight are at highest risk of developing excessive jaundice and hypernatremia to levels that can cause long - term developmental disability.
Studies done by the Touch Research Institute in Miami, the first
scientific center to study the biology of touch and its effects on health and development, have shown that premature infants who are massaged for 15 minutes three times a day gain more
weight and are able to be released from the hospital sooner
than those who are not massaged.
The spectacle of someone that smart dropping down through the
weight classes to make a
scientific pronouncement that could have been made by an untrained man drinking whiskey in front of the television struck me as, well, slightly unfair to those of us forced to try to make a living in the cutthroat and less - lucrative -
than - you - might - think field of Easy / Obvious Science.
MARDI and MARCI incorporate an innovative electronics design that enables high - quality
scientific data acquisition in a very compact package — each unit weighs about one - half kilogram (one pound), which is less
than one - tenth the
weight of any previous orbiter or lander camera sent to Mars.
There isn't any
scientific evidence that supports this practice other
than it achieves initial rapid
weight loss.
Essential oils have a chemical
weight of less
than 1000m (m =
weight of molecule), and according to
scientific testing, any substance of this
weight should be absorbed by the skin.
Look no further
than the National
Weight Control Registry, a large - scale
scientific surveillance study that has been conducted since 1994 by the University of Colorado and Brown Medical School.
There is overwhelming
scientific evidence that a low carb Mediterranean - style diet — one rich in vegetables, olive oil, nuts and the occasional glass of wine or bite of dark chocolate — is better for
weight loss, blood sugar control and improving cholesterol
than going on a low fat diet.
There are many people who look for a
scientific and effective diet plan to lose
weight and no doubt you can them many of them but surely you will not get any diet plan better
than the Atkins diet plan which will definitely very effective and help one person to lose
weight without losing the essential nutrients of the body.
This is most likely the reason why so many
scientific research done on losing
weight and maintaining the lost body
weight have revealed that you would probably have to work harder to maintain your slim stature
than you worked to shed your excess body fat in the first place.
DailyBurn offers more
than 100 workouts and 16 different exercise programs for men and women who want to lose
weight in a
scientific way.
In this revolutionary
weight - loss program informed by more
than 1,200
scientific studies, Bailor offers clear, comprehensive guidance on what to eat and why, providing an eating plan, recipes, and a simple yet effective exercise regimen.
In this revolutionary
weight - loss program informed by more
than 1,200
scientific studies, fitness and diet expert Jonathan Bailor offers concrete evidence that the calorie - counting model of
weight loss doesn't work.
Is there any discussion in the article regarding other measurements of health besides Type 2 Diabetes (especially since the majority of the
scientific community now knows better
than to use BMI as an indicator of health or «ideal
weight»)?
For fasting to be more
than a
weight - loss fad, greater
scientific rigor is needed from interventional trials
than is found in the literature.
In fact, one 2014
scientific review found that diet plus exercise was more effective for
weight loss
than diet alone.
The
scientific evidence summarized in the new recommendations reveals that parents can fend off problems at both ends of the
weight spectrum by simply focusing on a healthy lifestyle rather
than zeroing in on
weight or dieting.
In such a case it makes rather more sense to
weight near - unanimous
scientific consensus positions
than the
weight assigned to some uncredentialed fringe or another.
With all that emphatic speak and emotionally
weighting polluting whatever rational statements are left, he comes across sounding more like a religious evangelist or a door to door salesman
than a serious
scientific discussion.
Hence, the emphasis on the
weight, number and height of
scientific evidence articles, and expertise, rather
than on the process of testing competing theories.
Remember too that they are respected figures in bureaucracies in which received wisdom passes for truth, and where the incentive structure places less
weight on
scientific discovery and accuracy
than on getting things published, defending the party line, and swinging next year's budget increase.
While universities are much more liberal
than govt and it would be pretty astonishing for a faculty member not to get tenure owing to «stepping up», the time drain alone might be sufficient to diminish the faculty members publication list, and
scientific peers tend to become somewhat suspicous of scientists that «step up» and may consider them to be light
weights, have an agenda, etc..
However, the
scientific possibilities in Stern are
weighted slightly differently
than in the IPCC reports since, as he states, «policymakers need to take into account the risks of greater dangers, as well as central expectations, because the consequences if these risks were to materialise would be very serious» (Stern reply to Byatt et al).
Dressed up in
scientific language which the jury does not easily understand and submitted through a witness of impressive antecedents, this evidence is apt to be accepted by the jury as being virtually infallible and as having more
weight than it deserves.
It's taken four years of secret
scientific research to investigate the science of hair from root to tip, looking at 1010 miles of real human hair, and # 50 million in development to bring us a hair dryer that is said to have a motor that is eight times faster
than other hair dryers and half the
weight * They tested the product on different hair types and built test rigs which mechanically simulate hair drying techniques — which can differ around the world.