The total sum of your characteristics is then
weighted against the claim average for people who share your traits.
Not exact matches
Another argument
against the banning of junk food advertising to children
claims that assertions about causal influences of food advertising on children's diets and
weight are flawed because they do not take into consideration other risk factors.
The FTC has filed lawsuits
against the makers of Cortislim and Cortistress, charging them with making false and unsubstantiated
claims that their products can cause
weight loss.
Bitter orange is
claimed to be effective
against extra
weight, nasal congestion and allergies.
While Mike is often seen talking
against the false
claims made by supplement brands to promote their products, Phoenix
Weight Loss Pills do the same to an extent.
I've spent some time writing a few of these posts and while I don't
claim that they hold their
weight against the Newyorker, I do say that they are more powerful than any content - mill post I could publish.
As we have previously considered (see previous article cited above) the courts will give significant
weight to Art 10 arguments in
claims brought
against the media.
The District Court denied Kirtsaeng's motion, giving» «substantial
weight» to the «objective reasonableness» of Wiley's infringement
claim,» and stating that» «the imposition of a fee award
against a copyright holder with an objectively reasonable» - although unsuccessful - «litigation position will generally not promote the purposes of the Copyright Act,»» and that no other factors «outweighed» that objective reasonableness to warrant fee - shifting.
If you have been seriously injured by defective
weight lifting or exercise equipment, you may have a viable products liability personal injury
claim against a manufacturer.
So the extent to which obesity was relevant for selecting Mr Kaltoft as the only childminder to be dismissed was uncertain, but Mr Kaltoft contended that he was dismissed on account of his morbid obesity and he brought an action before the Disctrict Court
claiming that he had been discriminated
against due to his
weight.
«[T] he
weight of authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it is likely to have an adverse impact on the subjects of the report — usually does not give rise to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of
claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers
against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.
Recently, a plaintiff's purported class action
against Diet Dr. Pepper went flat when a California federal judge held that the term «Diet» alone on a soft drink label does not constitute a
claim that the soft drink will assist in
weight loss.
The majority's decision gave considerable
weight to those
claims, but emphasized that there is no hierarchy of rights under the Charter, such that the those
claims must be balanced
against the co-equal
claims to religious freedom (and freedom from discrimination on the basis of religion).
The total sum of these values is
weighted against the national
claims average for other motorists who share similar attributes.
The sum of all of your risk values are then
weighted against the average national
claims rates of other drivers who share your characteristics.
The sum of these risk values is then
weighted against the national
claim average of motorists who share your characteristics.
The sum of these values is then
weighted against the national
claims average for motorists who share similar attributes.
The total sum of these risk values are then
weighted against the national
claims average of motorists who share similar traits.
These are very complex mathematical formulas that
weight different factors about you, which you provide the company with, to determine how likely you are to make a
claim against your coverage that will coast the company money.
The sum of these values in then
weighted against the national
claims average of motorists who share similar traits.
You will need to
weight your needs and desires
against the amount of money you can spend on premiums and the likelihood of someone filing a
claim against you in Corpus Christi.