Sentences with phrase «weighted average expense ratio»

This year's asset - weighted average expense ratio is down from 0.56 % in 2016 and 0.63 % three years ago.

Morningstar's Annual U.S. Fund Fee Study found the asset - weighted average expense ratio across U.S. open - end mutual funds and exchange - traded funds (ETFs) was 0.52 % in 2017, an 8 % decline from 2016.

The asset - weighted average expense ratio for passive funds fell to 0.15 % in 2017 from 0.16 % in 2016, a 7 % decline.

More than 85 % of the Schwab market cap index ETFs have expenses lower than 0.10 %, with an asset - weighted average expense ratio of just 0.05 %.1 As one of the largest and fastest growing ETF families, we are able to offer the broad market access and diverse options that clients seek — with some of the lowest expenses in the industry.

The weighted average expense ratio was ~ 0.67 plus an AUM fee of 0.73 = 1.4 % drag on returns.

Their actively managed funds» weighted average expense ratio, while not terrible, is around 1.4 %.

With an asset - weighted average expense ratio of just 0.05 %, * our market - cap index ETF expenses are among the lowest in the industry.

* Asset - weighted average expense ratio is based on assets and operting expense ratios as of 9/30/17.

Unless they opt out, Wealthfront clients with taxable accounts of $ 100,000 or more may have up to 20 % of their portfolio allocated to the fund, bringing the weighted average expense ratio of the portfolio to 0.11 % (the weighted average expense ratio of a Wealthfront taxable portfolio without risk parity is 0.08 %).

And would find for this situation, this hypothetical portfolio pays an account - weighted average expense ratio of 0.03 % - lower than any fund you will find today, passive or not.

The asset - weighted average expense ratio for currency hedged European equity ETFs was 0.56 % and for currency hedged Japanese ETFs was 0.47 %.

footnote * Asset - weighted average expense ratios.

Convertible and all other type of bonds are ranked based on their AUM - weighted average expense ratios for all the U.S. - listed ETFs that are classified by ETFdb.com as being mostly exposed to those respective bonds.

Netherlands and all other countries are ranked based on their AUM - weighted average expense ratios for all the U.S. - listed equity ETFs that are classified by ETFdb.com as being mostly exposed to those respective countries.

Mexico and all other countries are ranked based on their AUM - weighted average expense ratios for all the U.S. - listed equity ETFs that are classified by ETFdb.com as being mostly exposed to those respective countries.

France and all other countries are ranked based on their AUM - weighted average expense ratios for all the U.S. - listed equity ETFs that are classified by ETFdb.com as being mostly exposed to those respective countries.

Not exact matches

Acquired fund fees & expenses The total annual asset - based fee, including the weighted average of the annualized expense ratios of the underlying mutual funds.

I have found it really difficult to determine the expenses associated with the brand - name target - date fund in my current 401 (k)-- it's made up of mutual funds, so I realized I had to look at the weighted average of their expense ratios.

In an equal weight portfolio these expense ratios average.20 %.

Percentages are based on asset - weighted average ETF expense ratios.

According to Morningstar's 2016 Target - Date Landscape study, the average asset - weighted annual expense ratio for target - date funds is 0.73 %, although individual funds can have annual expenses of 1 % or more or less than 0.20 % (the lowest - cost target - date funds generally invest solely or mostly in index funds).

According to a recent Morningstar fee study, the average asset - weighted expense ratio for index funds and ETFs was roughly 0.20 % compared with 0.80 % for actively managed mutual funds.

The asset - weighted expense ratio of these ETFs is 0.29 % and the average expense ratio is 0.49 %.

For this group of ETFs, the asset - weighted expense ratio is smaller than the average expense ratio.

According to the Investment Company Institute, average asset - weighted stock fund expense ratios fell from 1.08 % in 1996 to 0.84 % in 2015, as investors flocked to lower - cost funds.

Morningstar also noted a downward trend in target - date fund fees, with the average asset - weighted expense ratio falling to 0.66 % at the end of 2017; five years prior, the figure was pegged at 0.91 %.

4 For each Investment Option (with the exception of the Principal Plus Interest Option), the figures in this column are based on a weighted average of the expenses of each underlying Fund's expense ratio as reported in the applicable underlying Fund's most recent prospectus available prior to the date of this Supplement, in accordance with the Investment Option's asset allocation among its underlying Funds.

The expense ratio for underlying holdings was estimated using a weighted average of the ratios for the ETF's utilized in the SoFi Wealth model portfolios as of the date shown above.

For example, a recent Morningstar fee study showed that the average asset - weighted expense ratio for all actively managed mutual funds is roughly 0.80 % compared with about 0.20 % for index funds and ETFs.

Acquired fund fees & expenses The total annual asset - based fee, including the weighted average of the annualized expense ratios of the underlying mutual funds.

To get an idea of mutual fund and index fund fees, in a June 24, 2015 study, Morgan Stanley found that the average dollar - weighted expense ratios of actively managed were:

Expenses of the underlying holdings were estimated using a weighted average of the expense ratios for the ETF's utilized in the SoFi Wealth model portfolios at the date of the chart.