Deputies allege that Corrao acted in a manner which was injurious to the mental and moral
welfare of a child less than 17 years of age.
Not exact matches
• Where there are concerns for a
child's
welfare or safety,
of whatever sort, the fact
of his not having PR could discourage him from feeling responsible and empowered — and could make it
less likely that agencies engage with him effectively as risk and / or resource.
It's not exactly clear what's behind the trend
of more parents moving away from corporal punishment — it could be a result
of doctors and other
child health and
welfare experts spreading the word about extensive and well - researched evidence showing a clear link between corporal punishment and negative outcomes for kids, or it could be that this form
of punishing kids is
less socially acceptable than it used to be, or a combination
of both factors.
In
less than a year we have implemented many
of the action items in our health and human services plan, «Initiatives for a Strong Community,» as varied as bringing fresh foods and vegetables to inner city neighborhoods labeled «food deserts,» to completing a chronic neglect study and incorporating its findings into our
child welfare response programs, to increasing participation in the SNAP program to reduce hunger.
One way forward for simplification and increases in the productivity
of the federal investment is to make social programs intended to support lower income families with
children more like tax expenditures — putting more money directly in the hands
of parents to spend on the care and development
of their
children and
less money directly in the financial accounts
of states,
welfare agencies, and social service providers.
«For every dollar invested in high - quality, comprehensive programs supporting
children... there is a $ 7 - $ 10 return to society in decreased need for special education services, higher graduation and employment rates,
less crime,
less use
of the public
welfare system, and better health.»
The federal government now spends
less than it did about 30 years ago on some
of the country's poorest
children, the result
of cuts to federal
welfare programs, according to a new research paper.
For the prekindergarten program alone, they identified $ 92,220 in present value benefits and $ 8,512 in present value costs in 2007 dollars — a benefit - cost ratio
of 10.83 to 1.22 The benefits derived mainly from reduced public education expenditures due to lower grade retention and use
of special education, reduced costs to the criminal justice system and victims
of crime due to lower crime rates, reduced expenditures on
child welfare due to
less child abuse and neglect, higher projected earnings
of center participants, and increased income tax revenue due to projected higher lifetime earnings
of center participants.
As time went by, we felt disappointed when we saw so - called Christians who choose to care more about abortions than the
welfare of less fortunate but alive
children, or about keeping a brain - dead woman alive while ignoring the massive health - care crisis in this country that leaves millions
of poor people without any medical care, even for preventable health catastrophes.
growing food and livelihood insecurity, unreliable water supplies, deteriorating human
welfare and increasing manifestation
of erosive coping measures (e.g. eating
less, distress sale
of productive assets to buy food, reducing the years
of schooling for
children, etc.).
The evidence illustrates loss and damage around barriers and limits to adaptation: growing food and livelihood insecurity, unreliable water supplies, deteriorating human
welfare and increasing manifestation
of erosive coping measures (e.g. eating
less, distress sale
of productive assets to buy food, reducing the years
of schooling for
children, etc.).
The standard
of proof in finding the facts necessary to establish the threshold under s 31 (2)
of the
Children Act 1989, (ChA 1989) or the
welfare considerations in s 1
of ChA 1989, is the simple balance
of probabilities, neither more nor
less.
It is well established that sports organisations owe a duty
of care to
children and young people in relation to physical risks
of participating in sport, but there has been a dearth
of case law in relation to
less tangible issues like
welfare and emotional - wellbeing.
In the challenge, the First Nations
Child and Family Caring Society and the Assembly of First Nations argue the federal government, which is responsible for funding social programs on reserves, is discriminating by spending 22 per cent less on child - welfare services than provincial governments provide for children who live off rese
Child and Family Caring Society and the Assembly
of First Nations argue the federal government, which is responsible for funding social programs on reserves, is discriminating by spending 22 per cent
less on
child - welfare services than provincial governments provide for children who live off rese
child -
welfare services than provincial governments provide for
children who live off reserves.
Because reunification is
less likely for
children in kinship care, African - American
children may remain in the
child welfare system longer than
children of other races (Ards, Chung, & Myers, 1999; Terling, 1999; Everett, 1999).
Although the literature does suggest that the goal
of staff diversification is important for effective
child welfare programs (English & Brown, 1997), the data on race matching between worker and family are
less than compelling.
A fifteen - year follow - up
of the Prenatal / Early Infancy Project in Elmira, New York, showed that the nurse home visits significantly reduced
child abuse and neglect in participating families, as well as arrest rates for the
children and mothers.35 The women who received the program also spent much
less time on
welfare; those who were poor and unmarried had significantly fewer subsequent births.
Thus,
child and youth work in its infancy in Australia, alongside growing state education and social
welfare institutions, was providing, in many instances, a way
of keeping working - class youth under control and diverting their energies into
less disruptive pursuits.
However,
child welfare professionals in rural areas must recognize the differences between their practice population and urban populations and adapt their practice to meet the needs
of rural families who may have
less access to related services.
Studies show it is more cost effective and
less traumatic to
children to prevent a family from entering the State
of Arizona's
child welfare system.
«For every one dollar invested in high - quality, comprehensive programs supporting
children and families from birth,» the platform says, «there is a $ 7 - $ 10 return to society in decreased need for special education services, higher graduation and employment rates,
less crime,
less use
of the public
welfare system and better health.»
One
of its
less - heralded components was an instruction regarding the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS), the case - level data collection process that connects county and state
child welfare agencies to the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS).
But experts said that while the findings did not establish the image
of the wicked stepmother as true, they supported the conclusion that, for complex reasons, stepmothers do invest
less in
children than biological mothers do, with fathers, to a large extent, leaving to women the responsibility for the family's
welfare.»