For the first time, it will include a specific measure of how
well children on free school meals are doing.
Not exact matches
Start focusing
on what you can eat with this informative guide packed with step - by - step advice to help you keep living your life the way you're used to, including tips
on how to stock your kitchen and pack
school lunches, as
well as advice for hosting parties, preparing
meals, modifying recipes, planning for gluten -
free travel, and making sure your
child eats safely wherever they go.
CEO allows
schools to serve
free breakfast and
free lunch to all students when 40 percent or more of students are certified for
free meals without a paper application, which includes students who are directly certified (through data matching) for
free meals because they live in households that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or the Food Distribution Program
on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), as
well as
children who are automatically eligible for
free school meals because of their status in foster care or Head Start, homeless, or migrant.
This is certainly the intent of the National
School Lunch and Breakfast programs, which offer
free and reduced
meals to
children, based
on their families» income, as
well as full - price
meals to any student.
SNA championed
better nutrition for
children for 67 years and supported the 2010 Healthy Hunger -
Free Kids Act, which called
on the Agriculture Department to require
schools to provide healthier
meals in exchange for an increase in federal spending
on school lunches.
Identified students include those who qualify for
free meals because they live in households that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or Food Distribution Program
on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), as
well as
children who are certified for
free school meals without submitting a
school meal application because of their status as being in foster care, enrolled in Head Start, homeless, runaway, or migrant students.
The major policy announcement
on free school meals was the obvious move in this direction — as
well as being a sop to middle class voters who lost out after cuts to
child benefit — but Nick Clegg's speech is full of references to policies which help in day - to - day life: the pupil premium, flexible parental leave,
free childcare, a cap
on social care costs.
A Department for Education spokeswoman said that grammar
schools have a «track record of closing the attainment gap to almost zero between
children on free school meals and their
better off classmates».
But in secondary
schools, the attainment gap between
children on free school meals (FSM) and their
better - off peers has refused to budge in a decade.
«We'll be looking very carefully at what's happening in those local authorities with the same sort of population, with similar levels of deprivation, similar numbers of
children on free school meals, where one particular local authority does extremely
well and another one doesn't.
Results of national tests known as Sats taken by 10 and 11 - year - olds in England show that
children on free school meals do less
well than their classmates, and the pattern continues to GCSE level.
Therefore, with the same level of attainment, a
child on free school meals does
better in a grammar
school than they would if they went to a non-grammar
school.
We know that the education gap between
children on free school meals who go to grammars and their
better - off counterparts is closed during the course of their education.
Children in grammars
on free school meals are twice as likely to get five
good GCSE grades, and so twice as likely to secure a place at and to attend one of the top Russell Group universities, as their wealthier peers who attend comprehensives.
Within that system, in particular,
children from low - income families,
on free school meals or in receipt of the pupil premium are doing especially
well in our grammar
schools.
Mr Laws told delegates it was «quite literally intolerable» that in some
schools and certain areas of the country almost eight in 10
children on free school meals - a key measure of poverty - failed to get five
good GCSEs, including maths and English.