Sentences with phrase «well claim science»

Not exact matches

As well as being highly skeptical of the science behind General Fusion's designs, Vogt is critical of the way the company received financing from SDTC, claiming it ducked the normal process of receiving government funding.

We don't know much about the author other than he appears to have no professional financial background or qualifications, is well - qualified in computer science and claims experience in data science and simulation.

The heretical philosopher of science Paul Feyerabend, on the other hand, claimed that new theories frequently contradict the best available evidence — at least at first.

If there were such a list, I'd suggest it better be flexible since science keeps ripping away some of the silly claims.

In dealing with sub-atomic particles Heisenberg claimed that human science at best attains probabilities.

As I'll discuss at the end of my presentation, political science only does this by dint of a systematic abstraction of our lived political experience, that is, by singularly emphasizing politics as the management of a conflict of interests rather than the prudential navigation of conflicts between competing claims to honor, or of competing claims to the good.

Religion also makes a lot of claims about the physical world and why things happen, well within the purview of science, and all of them happen to be baseless.

I find it baffling that anyone would claim it's good news for the faithful that science has more evidence for what science already accepted as fact for so long.

It IS funny, because many people who claim that they are «scientific» just blindly accept «Corporate Science» aimed at keeping them logically ignorant, meaning, they can use logic and reason (and even rhetoric if you know your Trivium) to argue well for false ideas.

Physics - lite @ CN77 & Andrew Andrew's Quote «It's not all that pointless, see while you would never be convinced that your bronze age mythological beliefs about the creation of the universe are wrong, since I can rebut (with peer reviewed journal articles no less) any claim you make, in rather stunning detail, those who are not so well versed on the subject who read the dialogue could be swayed to the side of science.

In our free democratic society the colleges of liberal arts and sciences ought to claim and make good their right to freedom of investigation.

Kind or ironic when people who think the universe was designed for the sole purpose of God planning to have a relationship with them accuse people of being arrogant because they claim science is a better way to understand the natural world.

Good Morning Science; Did you happen to see John P Traver's post a page or two back where he claims that Evolution and Big Bang have been proven false?

Nothing gets «proven» as it does in the hard sciences (and there is good reason to say that science doesn't actually «prove» nor does it claim to), but in more complicated systems, such as social, human ones, proof is very difficult (why should we not expect it to be so in theology also?).

It is day's «cir needs to by lay claims not fully lay cosmological paradigms to so being infiltrations upon physicalisms, day's the fore I say controlling to so better - fractals of masses the meaning to by science and discommonerstoo nauseatings of infiltrating inward inter this and hen and much less.

Every Pope claims to be the infallible representation of Gods hand on earth, so it is pretty funny that nearly every single one has changed things from his predecessor implying that the last Pope may not have had it exactly right... If science and education can't prove evolution to you, Christianity should at least be a good example of it socially.

Science can not deal effectively with the appreciation of beauty, the enjoyment of personal relationships, judgments of value as to good and bad; its leaders nowadays are modest in their claims, unlike their ancestors in the last century and the early days of this one.

Despite the «science is settled» and «consensus» claims of the global - warming alarmists, the fear of catastrophic consequences from rising temperatures has been driven not so much by good science as by computer models and adroit publicity fed to a compliant media.

The declaration makes for good class discussion, but whenever I asked my classes to evaluate Freud's claim that science is the only reliable road to truth, it did not take them long to recognize that the claim itself is logically self - defeating, since it could never be justified by any conceivable scientific experiment.

Satan attacks me in my thoughts day and night and he makesit so i can barely eat i pray to the lord and he consoles me god is REAL i used to e a drug dealer the most violent and disruptive of men and one night i came under attack from satan and felt like satan was makeing me into someone im not putting thoughts in my head of death suicide and sexual immorality then i read the wqordof god and everything felt better when i read the Book «The Advocate» spiritual warfare is real and god can save you from satans tourment do nt let Satan claim the rights to your soul i had trouble believing in god for years my mind worked in science and fact but the fact is that God is real and living and when you leave this earth you Will face Judgement

Castoriadis's emphasis on the word «condition,» as well as his reference to both the biological and the cultural dimensions of perception, reinforces the claim that science, whenever it attempts to address the topic of mind, simply runs up against the limits of its own competency.

I asked a physicist, Dr P E Hodgson, staunch Catholic as well as a physicist, whether the claim that a moving body is constantly in and out of existence (which claim the above understanding of motion implies) was acceptable to science and he replied «there are speculations about this, but no experimental evidence».

In all honesty, the «religious people» that don't legislate against things based solely on their religious convictions and thereby hurt the rights of individuals, and who don't condemn science and medicine and societal progression and other religions and other denominations and people who are not religious, and who don't claim to know that something is true beyond all other truths, are probably a very slim minority, and I'd have to argue that they aren't really religious, they are just doing whatever makes them feel good, which could be accomplished through secular means as well.

Turmeric contains a well - studied, powerful anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant compound called curcumin — the claims of its health benefits backed up by good science.

So you're saying any studies that show formula yields better results (not that Tanya was making such claims) would be due to the impossibility of developing a fair sampling / testing method, but you have no problem extolling the virtues of breast feeding, not to mention perpetuating this modern day phrenology of head circumference as a determination of future IQ, based on the same flawed science?

The radio ads criticize Buerkle, claiming she supports a Republican bill to cut federal education spending by 40 percent, as well as reduce science and technology research spending by 40 percent.

Martin: One other thing that struck me: Marchers like to claim credit for all of the good things science has brought — from beer and antibiotics to air travel, but never any of the bad stuff.

This phenomenon needs to be understood by individuals, academic institutions, companies, and federal agencies who claim that they want to see the numbers of women and minorities going into science and engineering careers increase, because unfortunately «stereotype threat» is alive and well in the scientific community.

Announcing the work earlier this month at the First International Conference on Computer Science and Technology in Bangalore, India, Sen claimed the technique is so good that it has not made a mistake yet.

A new movie, Expelled, claims that intelligent design is good science that is being censored by adherents to evolution, which is nothing but Darwinian dogma.

Well, of course these days we now have a better understanding of that whole system and we know in fact it is all gravity, but had we taken Newton's perfectly theological claim about that and we just had been satisfied with that notion, then we wouldn't have done any of that science.

One view, subscribed to by the towering French figure of Jules Gabriel Verne, a man with a better claim to being the Father of Science Fiction than anyone else, was that the genre should consider itself almost a legitimate field of science proper, or at least should try to hold itself to an analogous code ofScience Fiction than anyone else, was that the genre should consider itself almost a legitimate field of science proper, or at least should try to hold itself to an analogous code ofscience proper, or at least should try to hold itself to an analogous code of rigor.

It's a «side effect of the collapse in public trust in science,» said Best, who also claimed that «many of the mines are not truly ethical.»

But that hasn't stopped British newspaper The Mail on Sunday trying to resurrect a dead duck: this time claiming that scientists at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) played fast and loose with data on a well - regarded 2015 paper in Science that definitively showed there was no pause in global warming.

Gary Orfield, professor of education, law, political science, and urban planning at UCLA, said opponents of the UT admission policy claim there are nonracial alternatives that do the job just as well, including the 10 % plan that UT now uses as its first phase for admission; approaches using socioeconomic status rather than race as a factor; and special outreach and recruitment efforts.

We are convinced that both have to go together: Good science gives the credibility we need in a world where unscientific claims are not rare; good business allows us to fund exciting intellectual idGood science gives the credibility we need in a world where unscientific claims are not rare; good business allows us to fund exciting intellectual idgood business allows us to fund exciting intellectual ideas.

ONE of the best things about science is its ability to correct itself, spot flaws, poor evidence and bad claims, track the myths they spawn to their roots — and axe them.

Rather, a good science communicator will take into account that scientific knowledge competes with alternative claims to knowledge — religious, cultural or other.»

And now it has something to show for it, reports Science: The company claims it's gotten ten times better at containing high - energy particles necessary for fusion...

You only impugn yourself if you claim that the anti-science Heartland Institute promotes is «just good, transparent, honest science.»

There are many claims about the health benefits of olive oil, such as its ability to increase «good» HDL cholesterol, but the science is not conclusive.

While everyone claims to have the best sleep supplement on the market, we believe we can actually back up this claim with real science and real numbers.

While the authors should know better than to make such claims, it's very clear that the science - naive journalists who report on these studies have never learned that association does not equal causation.

For all these «experts» you need to evaluate their claims based on the best science.

They might sound good, but there's little science to back up their claims of these foods being beneficial for skin health (and before you suggest it — chia seeds and almonds are high in the omega - 3 ALA, not EPA or DHA, which are the omegas beneficial for skin, brain and heart health).

The 7 - Minute Workout may sound like it's too good to be true, but health and fitness experts who support the time - friendly fitness plan have something that backs up their claims: science.

While everyone claims to have the best pre-workout supplement on the market, I can actually back up such claim with real science, and real numbers.

The Center for Science in Public Interest (CSPI) has evaluated such claims on yogurt and found the evidence to be inconclusive at best, primarily owing to the limited research and small sample sizes.

While everyone claims to have the best pre-workout supplement on the market, we can actually back it up with real science and real numbers.

Dr Perlmutter IS right and years of science and research back up his claims along with true testimonials from real people - have you even read the book??? like I said before people like you who are not willing to give up gluten carbs and sugars are going to be the first ones to come on here with skepticism and claims that this is just another «fad diet - «newsflash Will this is a lifestyle and the followers are not in a cult they are real people who want to take charge of their health and live to see their great grandchildren and still be sound in their minds its fine to have questions but to come on here and insult this fine doctor who has helped so many people throughout his career and has written a New York times best seller to educate and help so many more people just makes you sound absurd and immature - he is speaking the truth everything we've been told about nutrition is a lie to profit the wheat industry, doctors and pharmaceutical companies because as long as people keep eating the wrong foods and getting sicker and fatter they will all profit.