In 2015, the last year for which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published comprehensive inventory numbers, energy - related CO2 emissions accounted for 77 % of gross US GHG emissions, with the remainder coming from direct CO2 emitted in industrial processes as
well emissions of methane, nitrous oxide, and other greenhouse gasses.
Not exact matches
While this is a
good way to get total
emissions of methane in a remote location where the main source
of the gas is natural gas production, it is not a
good way to pin
emissions down to any one
well, gathering or processing activity in the basin.
Most
of ConocoPhillips»
emissions in the San Juan Basin are from venting
of methane to the atmosphere during a
well cleaning process called «liquids unloading.»
Typically, during the drilling process,
methane emissions are estimated to be between 0.04 and 0.3 gram
of methane per second per
well.
«The
methane emissions from the gas
wells... are surprisingly high considering that all
of these
wells were still being drilled, had not yet been hydraulically fractured, and were not yet in production,» the paper reports.
For
wells with plunger lifts that vent to the atmosphere,
emissions averaged 1,000 scf to 10,000 scf
of methane per event.
A team
of researchers from the Cockrell School
of Engineering at The University
of Texas at Austin and environmental testing firm URS reports that a small subset
of natural gas
wells are responsible for the majority
of methane emissions from two major sources — liquid unloadings and pneumatic controller equipment — at natural gas production sites.
The study team hopes its measurements
of liquid unloadings and pneumatic devices will provide a clearer picture
of methane emissions from natural gas
well sites and about the relationship between
well characteristics and
emissions.
«There are also other important measures to reduce
methane emissions from coal mining, municipal waste treatment and gas distribution, for example, as
well as black carbon
emission reductions through elimination
of high - emitting vehicles, use
of cleaner biomass cooking and heating stoves, replacement
of kerosene wick lamps with LED lamps and other measures,» adds Zbigniew Klimont
of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria, who also took part in the study.
The study is the second phase
of the team's 2013 study, which included some
of the first measurements for
methane emissions taken directly at hydraulically fractured
well sites.
Lamb's
methane emissions project is part
of a group
of ongoing studies that are looking at the entire natural gas supply chain, from the production
wells to the transmission pipeline system to local distribution systems.
A new study provides one
of the first quantitative estimates
of the
methane leak rate from the blowout
of a natural gas
well in California in 2015, suggesting that
emissions from this event temporarily doubled those from all other sources in the entire Los Angeles Basin, including landfills, dairies, and other leaks.
Experts on greenhouse - gas
emissions tell me that every time my car burns a gallon
of gasoline, I am putting more than 25 pounds
of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere as
well as a smaller amount
of methane, nitrous oxide, and various other toxic gases.
On Tuesday, the governments
of California and six other western states as
well as four Canadian provinces proposed a new plan to cut greenhouse gas
emissions by 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 using a similar cap - and - trade market — and would expand such regulations to encompass not just CO2 from power plants but also cars and trucks as
well as other greenhouse gases, such as potent
methane.
This stability in
methane levels had led scientists to believe that
emissions of the gas from natural sources like livestock and wetlands, as
well as from human activities like coal and gas production, were balanced by the rate
of destruction
of methane in the atmosphere.
The United States has released an ambitious, climate - and conservation - focused agenda for its 2 - year chairmanship that includes pushing for more research on black carbon, which accelerates melting in the region, and on
emissions of the potent greenhouse gas
methane from the seabed and permafrost, as
well as creating a network
of marine protected areas in the Arctic and equipping Arctic villages with renewable energy sources.
A 16 - year study was used for robust estimates
of the yield potential on organically managed crop land in southern Wisconsin as
well as nitrous oxide and
methane emissions and soil carbon.
Environmental controls designed to prevent leaks
of methane from newly drilled natural gas
wells are effective, a study has found — but
emissions from existing
wells in production are much higher than previously believed.
In the new paper, published in the journal Environmental Research Letters, Höglund - Isaksson estimated global
methane emissions from oil and gas systems in over 100 countries over a 32 - year period, using a variety
of country - specific data ranging from reported volumes
of associated gas to satellite imagery that can show flaring, as
well as atmospheric measurements
of ethane, a gas which is released along with
methane and easier to link more directly to oil and gas activities.
Last year, for instance, an industry - funded study on the
methane emissions from fracking
wells was published in the prestigious journal, Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Sciences.
But based on that data, they estimate that
emissions from abandoned
wells represents as much as 10 percent
of methane from human activities in Pennsylvania — about the same amount as caused by current oil and gas production.
The researchers have used their results to extrapolate total
methane emissions from abandoned
wells in Pennsylvania, although they stress that the results are preliminary because
of the relatively small sample.
While examining ways that carbon dioxide could escape underground storage, Kang wondered about the effect
of old
wells on
methane emissions.
Even
better, by analyzing some 400 potential soot - and
methane -
emission control measures, the international team
of researchers found that just 14 deliver «nearly 90 percent»
of the potential benefits.
Many studies investigating
methane leaks have used different methods
of measuring
methane emissions, but none have been able to capture so
well how
methane emissions fluctuate during the course
of a year, he said.
«The overall significance is that although we already know that reducing
methane emissions can bring great societal benefits via decreased near - term warming and improved air quality, and that many
of the sources can be controlled at low or even negative cost, we still need
better data on
emissions from particular sources,» Duke University climate sciences professor Drew Shindell said.
Scientists unaffiliated with the study said it shows
better data is needed to fully understand the extent
of the climate challenge posed by landfill
methane emissions.
Economists and scientists developed the calculation to give policymakers a
better idea
of the economic benefits
of cutting
methane emissions.
The bulk
of methane emissions in the United States can be traced to a small number
of «super emitting» natural gas
wells, according to a new study.
Or it could be that
methane variations are mostly produced by wetland
emission, driven by climate change as
well as land use decisions, according to another set
of papers.
The new interpretations reveal
methane emissions may account for a third
of the climate warming from
well - mixed greenhouse gases between the 1750s and today.
The study found that natural gas end use sources — like gas meters, furnaces, boilers and hot water heaters — as
well as landfills, are responsible for a large portion
of urban
methane emissions.
The research team then used two different methods to calculate the
best estimates
of global
methane emissions from the data.
The
best way to estimate the magnitude
of fossil
methane emissions is by using measurements
of methane isotopes, such as carbon.
There is an urgent need to
better reconcile bottom - up estimates with atmospheric estimates
of methane emissions.
But the new Purdue study suggests the EPA's inventories may not be quantifying all the
methane emissions from
wells being drilled because few people have measured
methane leaking from
wells in the earliest stage
of well development — the actual drilling itself.
A University
of Texas study found last year that natural gas
wells leak
methane at about the rate reported in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
methane emission inventories, and the leaks can be contained with
emissions control technology.
The EPA estimated in 2011 that natural gas drilling accounts for about 1,200 gigagrams, or 2.6 billion pounds,
of methane emissions each year from
well completions, equipment leaks and pneumatic controllers.
But a study published Monday adds to the growing evidence those escaping gases, called «fugitive»
emissions, are numerous, especially
methane emissions while a
well is being drilled, a phase
of well development previously thought to emit little if any
methane.
The study shows that during drilling, as much as 34 grams
of methane per second were spewing into the air from seven natural gas
well pads in southwest Pennsylvania — up to 1,000 times the EPA estimate for
methane emissions during drilling, Purdue atmospheric chemistry professor and study lead author Paul Shepson said in a statement.
Estimates
of methane emissions from the Arctic have risen, from land (Walter et al 2006) as
well now as from the continental shelf off Siberia.
Because
methane is mostly
well - mixed in the atmosphere,
emissions from the Arctic or from the US must be seen within the context
of the global sources
of methane to the atmosphere.
The study, «Toward a
better understanding and quantification
of methane emissions from shale gas development,» was published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Sciences and undertaken by Dana R. Caulton and Paul B. Shepson
of Purdue and a host
of co-authors, including Anthony Ingraffea and Robert Howarth, Cornell scientists who are prominent foes
of fracking, along with Renee Santoro
of Physicians Scientists & Engineers for Healthy Energy, a nonprofit group that has been critical
of fracking * (Ingraffea is affiliated with the group, as
well).
Using this new information as
well as other independent studies on
methane emissions published since 2011, and the latest information on the climate influence
of methane compared to carbon dioxide from the latest synthesis report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released in September
of this year, it is clear that natural gas is no bridge fuel.
The nation's largest single source
of methane emissions is the vast network
of infrastructure, including
wells, pipelines and storage facilities, that supplies U.S. natural gas.
The agency also took an overdue step to clarify how to curb
emissions of methane from the hundreds
of thousands
of wells, compressors and other leaky parts
of the nation's sprawling oil and gas industry, issuing an «Information Collection Request» requiring companies, among other things, to describe the types
of technologies that could be used to reduce
emissions.
An E.P.A. review
of methane emissions from gas
wells in the United States strongly implies that all
of these figures may be too low.
There's some torquing, as
well, around a new commentary on the measured and projected carbon
emissions (both in
methane and carbon dioxide) from warming, thawing Arctic tundra published in this week's issue
of Nature.
That's why a great deal
of attention was paid last week to the results
of a two - day aerial survey over gas fields in southwestern Pennsylvania that calculated
emission rates
of methane (the main component
of natural gas) from two
well pads still in the drilling phase.
The need for greater certainty in the
methane budget, as
well as the need for
better information upon which to facilitate
methane emissions reductions, has motivated the large effort EDF has been leading, one involving dozens
of academic experts.