Sentences with phrase «well of empathy»

This is a film of limitless imagination, a deep well of empathy that ignites the senses and engages the mind.

Not exact matches

However, sustained engagement on issues of equity and inclusion, activities that place participants in the situations that oppressed people experience (what I call «addressing the empathy gap»), and setting goals — much like the one Starbucks envisioned a decade ago regarding pay equity — are some examples of evidence - based best practices.

All of which is good to know, but do each of us have any control over the amount of empathy we feel?

Audiences respond best when they experience a sense of empathy.

Flex your empathy muscle by asking better questions to get to the core of a matter.

In terms of economic policy, our empathy for the owners of smaller businesses can cause us to assume that what is good for them must automatically be good for the economy.

For instance, as a manager and emerging leader, you might focus on behavioral self - control and empathy, enabling you to stay composed and unflappable in challenging situations, and helping you better relate to the concerns of your team.

They help build trust because they trigger the release of oxytocin, the «feel good» chemical in our brains that enhance our ability to feel empathy.

While Schnatter has discussed his uniquely homespun hiring process before as well as his employee management strategy, this latest act should serve as a heartrending example of how great leaders, with a little empathy, can transform their companies into communities.

With skills honed for conflict resolution (or outright avoidance), high empathy, a more realistic view of what it takes to succeed, and even a better grasp of how to listen and work in a team, middle children are a better match because they already «get» the flat structure of families.

Through empathy and understanding, she's imparted inspiration and strength to not only her Harry Potter fans, but to the rest of the world as well (just take a look at her Twitter account).

I didn't see it at the time, mostly because I lacked empathy and couldn't understand her point of view, but she was definitely giving me an opportunity to adjust my tactics and become a better leader.

There are good reasons that experts like Daniel Goleman have hailed empathy as a core competency of good leadership.

«If a person sees life with more acceptance of the waves of desire and sexual frequency flowing like waves on the ocean, the better resilience and empathy one has throughout their life for their own body and that of their partner or partners.»

«At the same time, we've learned a lot from our customers, in terms of care, and empathy and service, and we plan to bring these lessons to larger and larger businesses, as well as more small and medium enterprises, over time.

What leaders and managers need to after are the promoters of oxytocin — figuring out the job tasks, team atmosphere, and leadership behaviors (like empathy and compassion, for example) that will release the feel - good neurochemicals in the brain, like oxytocin.

A lot of the founding principles of Facebook are that if people have access to more information and are more connected, it will make the world better; people will have more understanding, more empathy.

That kind of empathy requires truly understanding the client — maybe even better than the client understands him or herself.

Growing up near the sixth tee of the club, Palmer learned the grip and the swing from his father, as well as manners, empathy, integrity and respect.

No one understands the business imperative of creating meaningful experiences better than Brian Solis, futurist and author of X: The Experience When Business Meets Design... Solis defines empathy — the ability to understand and share another person's feelings — as the secret ingredient in creating meaningful experiences.

Reading novels can improve empathy and understanding of social cues, allowing a leader to better work with and understand others — traits that author Anne Kreamer persuasively linked to increased organizational effectiveness, and to pay raises and promotions for the leaders who possessed these qualities.

Having that trust and empathy makes it easier to have their ideas be brought to the table, but when your company is in the middle of a transformation, team dynamics can easily get in the way of good ideas, and often the group is silenced by the loudest voice.

If they originally build in some «ethical» loops, there will be controls, as well as capacity for improvement / learning, and also the instantaneous self - evolving feature will include a «port» which will connect via a network to all the others, thus producing an «equality» of sorts, and an appreciation / empathy for the «plight» of the rest, because all the lessons they all learned in the last 6 hours, (or whatever the download separation is) will be downloaded and become common to all, immediately.

If they can create or adapt beings with all of the good characteristics of humanity - empathy, compassion, creativity, individuality, etc., and delete or vastly reconfigure the nasty ones - aggression, greed, violence etc., and emphasize compromise and acceptance where applicable; we might just have PEACE ON EARTH!

But when Dad got sick, I saw and felt the response of these «good» people for what it was — cold, hard, rigid dogma utterly lacking in compassion, empathy, or any type of wisdom or truth.

Well, if you've had these moments in your relationship, that won't change without active participation to address their lack of empathy on their part.

nothing makes the atheist more ticked off more than when you bring up GOD... God gets all the blame for all the tragedy in the world... If there wasnt a god in the first place, humans would not know tragedy or injustice when we see it... it would be a non-issue to us... survival of the fittest would not permit the emotions of love, compassion, empathy... Darwininian theory could not allow any of those and many other of the best of people's capacity for caring to surface... You cant explain it away by synapse or neurons... without a Supreme Being, there would be no sense of justice or injustice, we would not call it anything because there is no Ultimate Moral Standard to compare it.

On the other hand, I want as well to share faith and Christian hope with these people, to avoid shutting off genuine interpersonal encounter and my own self - disclosure because of any false allegiance to psychotherapeutic norms — and I doubt that empathy alone constitutes such a sharing.

In a community of empathy and agapé others live from me and for me as well.

Steve — I don't expect you to change or to see any other's point of view — but maybe it would be good to listen to others, have empathy with them rather then just perscribing your almost robotic response.

There needs to be an explicit acknowledgment of universal values such as fairness, altruism, empathy and solidarity if economics is to work for the common good.

A compassionate frame of mind has a positive effect on our mental and physical health, as well as on our social life, while the lack of empathy has been found to cause or aggravate serious social, psychological and even physical disorders.

Anyone who is simply behaving because of the threat of damnation or the promise of heaven has been bribed or extorted for their good behavior which means they are the worst kind of people, those with no morals of their own, no empathy for others and no love.

Of course, I'd love to be suprised, yet my experience is, that an «instant» miracle, doesn't seem like the best idea anyway, and I've come to see that it is through suffering and illness that I have gained both empathy and wisdom.

How is psychotherapeutic empathy analogous to the Christian good news of God's love?

Obviously it's ridiculous — atheists have very good morals because of an emphasis on empathy, and a lot of our philosophy is based on the knowledge that this is our one and only life so you'd better live it right, but I can understand why it's incredibly disturbing to someone who literally can not imagine life without religious belief.

A clearer conception of the self - disclosure of the accepting reality may help us hold together both sides of a seemingly paradoxical answer: The Christian good news is that God is with us and for us, which is the implicit basis of effective therapeutic empathy.

Their politics reflect that lack of empathy as well as the need to make others suffer.

But if He had done that when I asked, I wouldn't have gained the empathy that I have for others who struggle with these problems, and I wouldn't have studied the topic so extensively, making myself better equipped to possibly help others who struggle with these types of problems.

It's heartening to find this message in such a well - made film, especially because of the profound empathy the filmmakers display throughout, with both the struggling nuns and their newborn babies: All are the innocents of the title.

From this empathy should arise an acknowledgement of the well - organized tactics employed by the dominant culture to suppress Black progress and economic upward mobility leading to a mobilized effort to address them with the gospel.

Well, says the reverend, smiling indulgently to symbolise his empathy with the poor benighted fools who actually believe such fairy stories, while making quite clear that he, of course, is not one of those simple people, the important thing isn't that it actually happened.

It was well - written and on a religious side; does show to the riders of bull that prayer before going into the arena may well give them a mental sense of empathy between the natures of natural relativity and a godly presence unknown to most people.

I feel empathy for those evangelicals who voted for Trump on the calculus of the better of two bad choices, but I feel great frustration at evangelical leaders who excused his many sins, distorted the gospel, and tried to make a positive case for Trump's virtues as commander in chief.

Helen — It's not about lack of empathy for people who can not eat things they wish they could; my goal when making things that fall under these labels is that they should be so good that you'd eat them regardless of dietary limitations.

Dumbledore lectured me on the significance of morality and empathy, as well as the importance of humanity.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

there is some suggestion that wenger is backtracking on his fervent stance regarding what players would be staying at the club for the remainder of the season... some might deduce that this is all part of a much bigger, more elaborate plan... by shifting the blame wenger is attempting to, not so slyly, flip the narrative... by doing so he hopes to evoke empathy from his most ardent supporters, while attempting to rally any fence - sitters, whose faith was waning unless a more legitimate agent of blame emerges... unfortunately, and incredibly insulting to the fans, when wenger attempts to spin a tale and / or tries to eat his own words, he doesn't seem to play it all the way through in his head, so invariably gaping holes emerge... say we believed his version of the truth, would that not make him either an incredibly well - paid custodian of destruction or a spineless jellyfish because what manager worth his weight in salt would stay at a club that didn't give him final say after 20 years of supposed «success»... no matter the answer, neither bodes well for us... how ironic, in a way, since many pundits claim this team has lacked a «spine» for some years now... so whether we win, lose or draw on Sunday is frankly immaterial, as the problems will remain, and although it will be easier to digest if we left the Pool with 3 points, it might just be the worst result for the betterment of this club... a fact that both breaks my heart and baffles the mind

When he commiserates about a late goal flying in against a particularly troubled team, perhaps struggling towards the foot of League Two, we know it is in empathy as well as sympathy.