The index, based largely on how
well students score on standardized tests such as the Stanford 9, is part of a 3 - year - old carrot - and - stick program designed to make schools more accountable.
Not exact matches
A high school
student's GPA, researchers have found, is a
better predictor of her likelihood to graduate from college than her
scores on standardized tests like the SAT and ACT.
Finally, in Houston in 2010 — 11, he gave cash incentives to fifth - grade
students in 25 low - performing public schools, as
well as to the parents and teachers of those
students, with the intent of increasing the time they spent
on math homework and improving their
scores on standardized math
tests.
Researchers at Baylor College of Medicine studied eighth grade math
students and found gum chewers
scored 3 percent
better on standardized math
tests and achieved
better final grades (Wrigley Science Institute, 2009).
Officials say changes Illinois has made in how it categorizes
student performance — called cut
scores -
on standardized tests mean parents and community members must look beyond the report to evaluate how
well the...
And especially in this moment when we really care a lot about accountability in schools, there has been an increasing emphasis
on finding measures — like a
student's
standardized test scores — to tell us if a teacher is a
good teacher.
Studies have shown that
students who eat breakfast at school
score better on standardized tests and skip school or are tardy less often.
These
students also
scored significantly
better on California state
standardized math and English
tests.
There's plenty of evidence that
students attending «no excuses» charter schools can do extremely
well on standardized tests, but do the benefits of this approach to education extend beyond
test scores?
There is precious little research demonstrating the value of school counselors
on student achievement ~ with
good reason it is difficult to demonstrate the impact of counselors
on standardized test scores ~ which have come to define achievement in recent years.
Achieving these expectations results in
students who
score well on standardized tests and go to college.
The
best incentive plans are those that go beyond rewarding select teachers whose
students score higher
on standardized tests, says Darling - Hammond; they use multiple measures to evaluate teacher performance and create career ladders capable of supporting and rewarding all teachers.
But, Esquith's
students also attend school six days a week,
score in the top five to ten percent nationally in
standardized tests, and go
on to some of the
best universities in the country.
With a
better understanding of why it is so inane — and destructive — to evaluate schools using
students»
scores on the wrong species of
standardized tests, you can persuade anyone who'll listen that policy makers need to make
better choices.
But now the CFR study says that teachers who are unusually
good at helping
students score high
on standardized tests today aren't just unusually
good at helping
students score high
on standardized tests tomorrow.
A successful undergraduate teacher in, say, introductory biology, not only induces his or her
students to take additional biology courses, but leads those
students to do unexpectedly
well in those additional classes (based
on what we would have predicted based
on their
standardized test scores, other grades, grading standards in that field, etc.) In our earlier paper, we lay out the statistical techniques [xi] employed in controlling for course and
student impacts other than those linked directly to the teaching effectiveness of the original professor.
While many parents, educators, school leaders, and policymakers disagree about the kinds of
tests administered, how the
scores should be used, and how frequently
students should be
tested, it is important to be supportive of your child's efforts
on standardized tests, and to help her do her
best.
The cry is for
good teachers to be rewarded and bad teachers to be tossed out of classrooms, based
on student achievement assessed by
scores on standardized tests.
Michael Soskil: We need a shift in focus from accountability measures based
on standardized test scores toward metrics that take into account universal access to quality teachers and learning environments, robust curricula that include the arts, as
well as
student engagement and
well - being.
Furthermore, high school GPA provides a more
well - rounded account of a
student than a
score on a corporately produced
standardized test.
State accountability systems focus attention and resources
on low performance and remediation, but in many school districts across the country district leaders are as much concerned, if not more, about sustaining
good performance and about establishing agendas for
student learning beyond proficiency
scores on standardized tests.
The San Diego - area Barona Indian Charter School, for example, posted big gains in
student performance
on standardized test scores in the 2003 - 2004 school year,
besting the state average.
Some in the District also say that
test scores rose because the percentage of white
students — who traditionally do
better on standardized tests — has grown in District schools in recent years.
Summary: Americans overwhelmingly think there is too much emphasis
on standardized testing in public schools and that
test scores are not the
best way to judge schools, teachers or
students, according to a national poll.
Distilling critics» fears to the common denominator, one finds an overarching concern that the current discussion about IPS reform will center
on shifting control of money and power without genuine awareness of what techniques could
best shape IPS
students into life - long learners capable of achieving success
on a broader plane than that defined by
standardized test scores.
The studies examined schools that
scored well on standardized or criterion - referenced
tests while serving
students from inner - city areas or neighborhoods with low socioeconomic status.
KNOWLEDGE BRIEF 15 by Stephen Raudenbush
Student scores on standardized tests are used as measures for teacher accountability, but, arguably, helping children
score well on an achievement
test is of little value in itself.
The analysis looked at the first two years of a four - year program, which has multiple steps, including increased teacher development, and an incentive payment scheme in which teachers are paid more when their
students do
better on standardized test scores.
He was a co-author of a study that showed that teachers who helped
students raise
standardized test scores had a lasting effect
on those
students» future incomes, as
well as other lifelong outcomes.
For example, teachers of color can
better identify and promote giftedness in
students of color: These
students score higher
on standardized tests when taught by teachers of color.
While the Department will likely add more academic performance measures in the future, for 2014 officials also included the level of participation in state assessments, achievement gaps between
students with disabilities and the general population as
well as
scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a
standardized test used to gauge academic growth across the country.
California has identified English learners based
on how
well they do
on the language development
test but has left it up to districts and
students» teachers to also weigh a mix of factors, including teacher judgment,
scores on other
standardized academic
tests and parent consultations.
Billions spent
on collecting
standardized test scores have successfully given us a sense of how
students perform across school districts and states (the answer: not very
well), but they do little to tell us meaningfully about how individual
students are doing.
During the strike, Chicago Teachers Union president Karen Lewis said she was concerned that «too much of the new evaluations will be based
on students»
standardized test scores,» and argued there were «too many factors beyond our control which impact how
well some
students perform
on standardized tests, such as poverty, exposure to violence, homelessness, hunger, and other social issues beyond our control» (Chicago Teachers Union, 2012, para. 5).
The studies, both by the Community College Research Center at Teachers College, Columbia University, found that as many as a third of
students sidetracked into remedial classes because of their
scores on standardized tests would have earned a B or
better if they had simply proceeded directly to college - level courses.
In 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency found that that
students who attend schools in poor condition
score 11 percent lower
on standardized tests than
students who attend schools in
good condition.
It goes by
standardized test scores, and holds teachers accountable for what's called
student growth, which comes down to the difference between how
well students performed
on a
test and how
well a predictive model «expected» them to do.
Seymour also said that using reverse - seniority for layoff considerations served the district
better than teacher evaluations based
on student standardized test scores.
LA Unified's
scores on state
standardized tests continue to fall below the state average, even though its
students posted slightly
better gains, according to results released Wednesday.
Teachers credit the program with renewing their
students» interest in science, as
well as improving their
scores on Michigan's
standardized science
tests.
The following chart (some of which I've published before) indicates that schools cream off a select group of
students —
students who end up doing statistically
better on standardized test scores.
In a curious choice, the «Odds» list is based
on how
well a school's low - income
students score on standardized tests but does not take into account how many low - income
students it has.
Tying teacher evals to
student test scores on a narrow focus
standardized test is a dumb idea and putting it off for a year won't make it any
better.
This means that similar
students (i.e.
students that
score similarly
on state
standardized tests) have been making more progress (
score better the next year than
students with similar
scores in the past) in Denver than Boulder across all
student groups.
His son, who usually did
well in school, had
scored too low
on a
standardized test to qualify for the district's program for gifted
students.
And with these
students less distracted and more engaged in school, they do
better on their academics; they average 11 percentile points higher
on standardized test scores than do
students without SEL training.
Most efforts to lift struggling schools focus
on students with the lowest
scores on standardized tests, as
well as
students who are «
on the bubble» — not college - bound
students who presumably are meeting grade - level expectations.
Many schools use
student scores on standardized tests for making decisions in terms of grouping and class placement as
well as other generalizations about the
student.
In an effort to settle the case, the district and its teachers» union reach agreement
on an evaluation program that factors in
standardized test scores as
well as Academic Growth over Time, a mathematical formula used to measure
student achievement.
Windham Superintendent Ana Ortiz said her district already implemented a gifted school in one section of Windham Middle School this academic year, devoting four teachers to work with 127
students in grades 3 to 8 who
scored well on standardized tests.