Sentences with phrase «well studied because»
The pathogen is well studied because half the world's population is infected with H. pylori.
http://www.genomenewsnetwork.org/ Not exact matches
He said that his research should not be called «modeling» because it is based on the combined findings of thousands of lab results, as well as several other studies he has published.
Other than the experimental - discipline aspect of his scientific studies, he really charted an unrelated course, because he stumbled upon a good opportunity.
Nicholas Pinter, a University of California, Davis, geoscientist who studies flood risk and water management, said that Florida is well - situated to build more wisely after this disaster because it already has a statewide post-disaster redevelopment plan and requires coastal communities to have their own.
«This is because people, other than very close friends and relatives, don't seem to relate well to those who constantly share photos of themselves,» lead study author David Houghton, of Birmingham Business School, said in a release.
«It appears that more beautiful workers earn more, not because they are beautiful, but because they are healthier, more intelligent, and have better (more conscientious and extraverted, and less neurotic) personality,» the study reads.
That's because nearly three - quarters of all sunscreens on the market don't work as well as they claim to, or they contain potentially harmful ingredients, according to a recent study from the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG).
This is good, because according to a Bain study, the average online clothing retailer doesn't make a profit from a customer until their fourth purchase.
For instance, a 2012 study published in Current Directions of Psychological Science suggests that it's best to avoid making important choices when you're feeling stressed, because you tend to overemphasize the potential positive outcomes of your decision while underemphasizing the negative
Because, according to the study by professors Olav Sorenson of the Yale School of Management and Michael Dahl of Aalborg University, the best place for any founder to start a venture is probably his or her own hometown.
One study by economist Elaine McCrate found that any reduction in wages associated with the benefit of flexibility is modest at best and, in fact, many jobs with greater flexibility have higher wages.137 Furthermore, the volatility of earnings for many independent contractors would offset any compensating wage differentials, because workers can not compare the value of flexibility to higher earnings when they aren't able to predict their earnings as independent contractors.138
I will finish with a word from Ronald Kleverlaan — co-founder of the European Crowdfunding Network, and the author of the foreword to my book: «Because equity crowdfunding is still very young, it is important to look globally for good case studies of successful ways to attract funding.»
And that's good because a Harvard University study found that setting specific goals increases motivation beyond simply telling yourself, «I'll just do my best.»
Because when the study was designed 16 years ago, the whole notion of» good fats» was not yet on the scientific scope.
Studies have shown that soldiers form strong bonds during missions in part because they believe in the purpose of the mission, rely on each other, and share the good and the bad as a team.
Before you can understand math, you have to believe it will do you any good to study it, else you'll probably fail out of math because it doesn't look like it's useful to you, like algebra... most people don't use it because they never believed it had any value to them, so they didn't study it, then they never found out how valuable it is.
There is a new study out that found that 19 % of straight guy have no interest in ever getting married because they find that p0rn+m@sturb @tion is «good enough» and thus wives are not worth their hassle.
Just believing something because you are to naive to know better (i.e. a child believing in Santa) is very different from a person studying their religion, coming to truly understand it, and choosing to believe it.
Our church is doing this study because we want our focus to be for the good of all in our community, church, and world.
I grew up believing that you were better than us because surely you spent hours and hours in study and prayer and reflection on The Things of God.
I grew up believing that you were better than us because surely you spent hours and hours in study and...
(iii) you are a complete blowhard who has never studied one subject of university level biology, never been on an archaeological dig, never studied a thing about paleontology, geology, astronomy, linguistics or archaeology, but feel perfectly sure that you know more than the best biologists, archaeologists, paleontologists, doctors, astronomers botanists and linguists in the World because your mommy and daddy taught you some comforting stories from Bronze Age Palestine as a child.
Because there are others who believe the same way I do, and we have the best Bible scholars, and the best seminaries, and the biggest churches, and the most authors, and our missionaries are very active overseas, and we agree with most of the teachings of the church throughout history... at least since the Reformation anyway... and I believe that with time, and a little education of how to really study the Bible, people will eventually see that what I believe is the right way to believe.
«These things have evolved because they're good for the parents, but they sometimes, not [with] high frequency, but sometimes carry over» into offspring, study researcher William Rice, an evolutionary geneticist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, told LiveScience.
Because I will shortly offer some criticisms of Robert Jewett's effort, I want to begin by acknowledging what is good and important in a work that culminates a long career devoted to the study of Paul.
Meanwhile, the slightly - older - than - middle - age grandmother who doesn't play the piano so well — or the forester who loves to study the Bible but can't make it every Sunday — or the welder and his wife, who homeschools their 3 children with the desire to minister to their kids and their friends but can't because they ticked off the pastor's wife on the last trip — they'll just sit and wait, or wonder if they should leave and re-enter.
So that even though the end result can only happen on a personal level, it is definitely better than nothing and it's not like for those others that getting their own perspective through study plus prayer plus trying out the gospel principles is unavailable because it is it available; quite available.
I suppose unless I'm already a believer I will need to pay a believer a nice sum of money in order and take a class in order to understand why a covenant that carries the penalty of death if this god is not worshipped is changed because, help me here (well of course unless god can speak for himself - I guess I have to ask those who have studied his word that he gave only once 2000 years ago to another culture), so after this covenant he came down and became a man in order to give people grace so he doesn't kill them if they don't worship him?
All you got to do is research them yourself, also Christianity in it's purest form is not religion, it is truth because all you have to do is study the Holy scriptures and apply them to your life & human history & you'll see this is the real deal & not some book written y a bunch of random guys whio wanted to tell a good story.
It's topics like this that a lot of thorough study of original context of the original documents are required, because there are lots of verses that suggest faith alone is required for salvation and others that suggest that faith plus consistent good behavior are required and the bible can't contradict itself if it's inspired by God.
I put this case study out there because you are certain that jesus and god set the moral standard of «good», the furthest end of the spectrum that good can be.
Figures because studies suggest we atheists have a better understanding of religious texts then the religious.
Just because someone from a suburb in Connecticut knows that the primary religion in Indonesia is Muslim doesn't make them better in some way that this study is trying to identify.
The «useless» education for leisure, best represented by the traditional studies, has been despised because it supposedly does not increase one's occupational efficiency.
Well if I have to become an atheist it won't be because of years of careful study, use of logic reason and the weighing the cost of alienation.
I have studied the origins of Christianity and the history of hell and because of what I found I don't believe in hell, I don't think I'm going to heaven because I'm basically a «good» person and I don't know what happens when we die.
It goes on for a while — he is a professor of cultural studies — but its message is well worth considering, all the more so because of the remarkable circumstances under which it was written.
Jeremy can probably explain this to you better than I can because he has studied about this more than I have.
I left the church because I'm better at planning Bible studies than baby showers... but they only wanted me to plan baby showers.
In short, any book designed for those just beginning to study the Bible is a tool, and it had better be a good one, because if it fails, it not only fails me, it fails my friend.
Liberal studies are a luxury enjoyed by those who can afford to live the good life because they are not preoccupied with merely earning good wages.
Some guy (or gal) up on stage claims he has a better knowledge of god than I do because he studies theology at a seminary school.
Mary Somerville, overcoming, as her daughter says, «obstacles apparently insurmountable, at a time when women were well - nigh totally debarred from education»; Charlotte Bronte, writing in secret and publishing under a pseudonym because only so could she hope for just criticism; Harriet Hunt, admitted to the Harvard Medical School in 1850 but forced out by the enraged students; Elizabeth Blackwell, applying to twelve medical schools before she could secure admission, and meeting with insult and contumely in her endeavor to study and practice medicine; Mary Lyon, treated as a wild fanatic because she wanted American girls to be educated — such figures are typical in woman's struggle for intellectual opportunity.
This is why I believe it's so important to study both historical religious arguments supporting the abolition of slavery and historical religious arguments opposing the abolition of slavery (see my post on Mark Noll's The Civil War as a Theological Crisis» for a sampling), as well as historical religious arguments supporting desegregation and historical religious arguments opposing desegregation — not because I believe both sides are equal, but because the patterns of argumentation that emerge are so unnervingly familiar:
I grew up believing that you were better than us because you spent hours and hours in study and prayer and reflection on The Things of God.
In her view, congregation al studies are important for seminaries because the seminaries are accountable to the church, and important for congregations because understanding themselves better will enable them to hold up their side of the dialogue with seminaries and other church agencies.
Notice here that we do not use the words «spoken» and «heard,» because studies in communication have shown how much depends not only on explicit verbal content, but on appearance, gesture, and facial expressiveness as well as vocal tone and inflection, and how all of these are interpreted through the ethos of a particular congregation.
One of the best pieces of advice I had from Mary Ellen Chase, that superb teacher I was privileged to study with in college, was that anybody who was seriously considering writing as a profession must be completely familiar with the King James translation of the Bible, because the power of this great translation is the rock on which the English language stands.
(iii) you are a complete blowhard who has never studied one subject of university level biology, never been on an archeological dig, never studied a thing about paleontology, geology, astronomy, linguistics or archeology, but feel perfectly sure that you know more than the best biologists, archeologists, paleontologists, doctors, astronomers botanists and linguists in the World because your mommy and daddy taught you some comforting stories from Bronze Age Palestine as a child.
Lutheran congregations provide a good Petri dish for studying the megachurch impact, because Lutherans have a distinct theological tradition which they express in a particular liturgical style of worship.