Sentences with phrase «went by his logic»

And if we go by your logic, then elderly people shouldn't be allowed to get married nor should people who don't wish to have children or who are physically incapable.

Going by that logic, you are closed minded to the idea that tiny fairies that live in pocket dimensions are responsible for gravity.

If we went by your logic (how a small percentage of people doing a bad thing means all of them are like that) than heres what also should be true.

Lets go by your logic.

Suppose we go by your logic and tell him he doesn't deserve a raise as he's been injured.

With they money ManU, ManC and Chelsea have spent over the past 5 years, they should be winning «everything» if we go by the logic of» we need to spend in order to win»... The main thing that Leicester City EPL win proved is, having spent all of that money doesn't mean jack, if you don't utilize your team right.

If one was to go by the logic of that article then the conclusion will be that any defensive partnership with Mert will be fine for us.

Going by the logic of the article I made reference to, that partnership will not work.

makes a lot of sense but going by that logic every transfer has an iota of gamble associated with it.

Going by your logic the CL can also be regarded as a friendly competition because it is not open to all teams in Europe.

Well going by your logic, Giroud had 11 touches the other night for France (least fo any player including GK's)...... should we sell him?

BUT, if we're going by the logic and rules, if the total amounts they offer exceeds their allotted 2016 draft pool money, then shouldn't penalties be in play (taxes and most important — falling into the restriction category) for these team's 2017 draft?

Now going by your logic these clubs must be in the market looking for defensive midfielders otherwise they are as unambitious as Arsenal.

It is very simple; you do not simply sell your player because he under performed half of a season, If we go by this logic then we should have already sold 90 % of our team, moreover why would we want to sell our goalkeeper in his early 20s who can serve the club for at least another decade.

Of the English core you talk about the only regular player is Walcot, while others are back up players, so going by your logic Arsenal is no different from Man City, and Chelsea.

Going by the logic of the Nigerian Army that informed the decision to declare the trio wanted, the American government should therefore have declared wanted, popular CNN reporter, Christiane Amanpour and and terrorism analyst, Peter Bergen for their In the Foot Steps of Bin Laden series and The Bin Laden I Know respectively.

Also, if we go by your logic of excluding foods that taste too sweet, too smooth, too much like a bad think for you, then we should throw out sweet cream butter.

Going by that logic we should have FF7 in HD since it's released on ps3

I said it did, and if we went by his logic then the 360 would be # 1.

I mean if we go by that logic, she'll also will be losing it in Dark Aether, or when Mother Brain shot her with what I assume is a more painful beam.

going by your logic no game deserves a 10 because for it to have a score of universal 10 everyone in the planet should like it.

So i guess going by your logic all focus groups should be done with kids under 10 years old.

That's going by your logic.

If we go by your logic Mario on Wiiu would have nevet sold more than say a Driveclub:) Sure system install base matters but what matters more is the allure of the ip and attach rate.

Going by that logic, us Brits should see the game on the 25th as games usually release on Fridays in the UK.

Not exact matches

Pope John Paul II forcefully articulated this logic in his great but oft overlooked encyclical of 1980, Dives in Misericordia, where he affirms the importance of justice» meaning rights and desert» but goes on to argue that justice alone, detached from love and untempered by mercy, is prone to collapse into spite, hatred, and even cruelty.

Seriously, let's go down the logic path you propose — that gay marriage is sin that should be treated differently by the church than adultery, forced marriage to the man that date - rapes, and the assurance that each bride is a true virgin.

so by that logic everyone who sins goes to hell?

Troof, if you don't get the point by now, I don't think any website is going to help you understand the logic behind the metaphor.

Following that logic, and since God is all - knowing, souls are created by the Creator to go be forever damned and go to hell.

By your brilliant logic, one could also go into the grocery store produce aisle and claim it's proof that zeus created the universe... or a magical bunny.

Atheists are void of believing so they tend to go with the reason and logic of a given situation, not bound by texts written thousands of years ago.

If We are to «Go G - dless» as the graphic suggests just because a few Fools abuse religion, then by the same logic We should also abstain from alcohol just because a few Fools drive drunk, abstain from communicating just because a few Fools put forth unsound argument, and abstain from eating just because a few Fools eat too much.

By all means show your logic chain, and I shall show you exactly where you went off track into the ridiculous.

@sam stone: i believe it to be true by an exercise of logic if god knows what i am going to do before i do it, and god can not be wrong, then i have no choice but to do what god knows i am going to do

I mean this is you guy's logic, I'm not going to read the bible because it's not true and I don't believe anything in it and I'll show you that nothing is true in it by disproving what I think a book says even though I have never read it nor understand it.

consider your own logic: so here's a doctor who chooses not simply to make piles of cash in the US, but goes to the poorest continent not the planet... risking his life to work with people dying from an incredibly dangerous virus... openly admitting he is motivated by his faith in a God who didn't just risk his life, but gave it for others...

Unlike Samuel Beckett or Jorge Luis Borges, who provide a modernist critique of dialectical hubris by parodying the infinite regress of its logic while never going beyond that logic themselves, Solzhenitsyn claims to have learned how to move beyond the absurdities born of an unbridled rationalism, since he, and the rest of his fellow zeks (prisoners), have suffered dialectic's most extreme miscalculation.

This learning process goes in the other direction as well: I am likely to learn a great deal about the inner logic and systematic connections among my own religious beliefs by subjecting them to a polemical engagement, things, again, that I could learn in no other way.

I want to know if they think physicist Paul Davie is right about the obvious creation of universe governing physical laws, if Einstein was right in a God presence and what they think about quantum mechanics that goes back to von Neumann, where one is led by its logic (as Wigner and Peierls were) to the conclusion that not everything is just matter in motion.

Until religion can answer things we can see with our own eyes to be correct, or God drops by to tell us about himself, religion is going to continue to lose to logic.

However, I will go after really bad critical thinking and logic that «usually» (no always) happens to be provided by people of «faith.»

and do you know what logic they go by in literally voting what is said by jesus and what is not?

All the people born before Christian theology, and in areas in the world were Christian theology is not present, by her logic are automatically going to be lost.

Or more specifically, what right do you have, or by what logic can you tell someone not to act like there's no tomorrow if there isn't going to be one?

Soooo... by that logic Peter all laws barring discrimination or hate crimes should be removed... Let's go back to the time when women and black people can't vote because the ruling party in their state (like mine, Arizona) says their flavor of bigotry is ok.

by your logic, the Bible supports polyg.amy too — despite openly condemning it later — AND everyone who practices it (take Genesis for example) does not find their marital life going so well.

I'm not certain, but just going by basic logic that heat kills some if not all of the active nutrients.

By that logic, does that mean they are going to win the league?

I'm asking myself if the referee would've awarded a penalty if the same thing had happened in our area (obviously without going in the back of the net), and I don't think he would of, and indeed it shouldn't be (although they have be awarded), so by the same logic, I think it was a goal.