Sentences with phrase «went more attacking»

At the second goal he reacted instantly and went more attacking to try and save the game.

Wenger waited until the second half and then switched the team to go more attacking by sacrificing Coquelin (who'd been arguably our best player on the pitch).

Ipswich had a slightly more attacking outlook, they changed their shape to go more attacking and made substitutions to press for a goal but Brentford also continued to attack.

I understand that maybe you don't want to open up allowing chances to be made more easily but at this point, you have to try to go more attacking however that just didn't happen and it is part of the reason why Hellas are one of the favourites and most likely to go down this season.

Not exact matches

It's the idea that by developing strict procedures and guidelines and sticking to them, you will actually benefit from a freedom to focus more clearly on the objective at hand, rather than how you're going to attack it.

While old security holes going unpatched was the big reason for cyber incidents last year, more attacks are increasingly targeting connected devices, specifically mobile devices, Mong said.

I've heard small business owners say, «We don't have anything worth stealing» and «Nobody would go after us when they can get so much more from attacking ABC Co..»

Paired with a smart machine, you would be more effective and potentially less harmful to yourself — more people are going to die this year from «extreme selfies» than shark attacks — and even potentially happier, healthier and wealthier.

In the more public incidences of ransomware attacks, hackers haven't tried to go for very big paydays.

Few are more at risk in that catastrophe than the children of eastern Aleppo; prevented from going to school or even hospital, as both are deemed too unsafe, they live under constant fear of attack.

Paris (AFP)- Carlos the Jackal, the perpetrator of headline - grabbing attacks in the 1970s and early 1980s, goes on trial in France on Monday for the deadly bombing of a Paris shop more than 40 years ago.

Technical attacks can spread through corporate networks like wildfire, so going temporarily into «lock down» is usually a more sensible strategy than trying to keep everything running.

All the polls and pundits project the NDP to win, except Tyee's Rafe Mair who more than once warns Adrian Dix to «row like hell» and go on the attack or risk losing.

 Mr. Poloz himself bent over backwards in his last Monetary Policy Report to not use that term — even though the Bank's own numbers (projecting negative GDP growth for both the first and second quarters of 2015) suggested a recession was indeed already underway. Instead, public officials are normally sanguine and rose - coloured in their public pronouncements, hoping to incrementally shift consumer confidence with their cheeriness, and thus spark more spending. [A ridiculous extreme of this approach was provided when George Bush blithely encouraged Americans to go shopping in the days after the 9 - 11 terrorist attacks.]

goes through this long exposition of how those who attack ID as a religious theory encroaching on science are simple minded and that ID is somehow more complex than that betrays their own beliefs.

That faith is what helped him and his wife survive bomb attacks, injuries, and danger — more than once — and then go back into battle with a sane mind.

The cowards at CNN know Christianity is an easy target and can attack it without fearing for their lives, but that if they attack Islam — which is responsible for much much more violence in the world today — they will have to go into hiding.

Fed by LIES that a Jew had deliberately run over a black boy and MORE LIES that Jews deliberately let the boy die, and spurred on by a pillar of the community who showed up and ranted about «diamond merchants» in the neighborhood, a bunch of angry people went around attacking Jews indiscriminately.

why are people never satisfied... go attack the Red Cross or the Peace Corps for «doing but not doing enough» because the facts show the RCC does more than those organizations for the poor

The more people abuse our rights, the more likely that we're going to lose them,» he was referring to the atheist but it is actually more applicable to the Muslim guy — HE is the one who abused our rights and HE should realize it is HIS responsibility to abide by our laws and NOT ATTACK someone whose views are offensive to him.

Perhaps in no instance was that more apparent than the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, when State Department policy prevented consular officers from properly scrutinizing the visa applications of several of the 19 foreign nationals who went on to murder nearly 3,000 Americans.

I really feel that the organization is going about this in the wrong way... I don't understand why they are trying to make atheism into a religion... if they want to have a billboard then let them have a billboard but it should be more passive instead of attacking other religions... live and let live

One theory I have is that the devil attacks them harder, and that while trying to live the life of the Cross, it acts like testing metal in fire — the worst will come out, burn brighter, they may have more suffering going on and less wordy things to turn to as crutches — these aren't excuses, but possible reasons.

1 Corinthians 11:14 (Men should not have long hair) 1 Corinthians 14:34 - 35 (Women should remain silent in church) Deuteronomy 13:6 - 16 (Death penalty for Apostasy) Deuteronomy 20:10 - 14 (Attack city, kill all men, keep women, children as spoils of war) Deuteronomy 21:18 - 21 (Death penalty for a rebellious son) Deuteronomy 22:19 - 25 (Kill non - virgin / kill adulterers / rapists) Ecclesiastes 1:18 (Knowledge is bad) Exodus 21:1 - 7 (Rules for buying slaves) Exodus 35:2 (Death for working on the Sabbath) Ezekiel 9:5 - 6 (Murder women / children) Genesis 1:3,4,5,11,12,16 (God creates light, night and day, plants grow, before creating sun) Genesis 3:16 (Man shall rule over woman) Jeremiah 19:9 (Cannibalism) John 3:18 (He who believes in Jesus is saved, he that doesn't is condemned) John 5:46 - 47 (Jesus references Old Testament) Leviticus 3:1 - 17 (Procedure for animal sacrifice) Leviticus 19:19 (No mixed fabrics in clothing) Leviticus 19:27 (Don't trim hair or beard) Leviticus 19:28 (No tattoos) Leviticus 20:9 (Death for cursing father or mother) Leviticus 20:10 (Death for adultery) Leviticus 20:13 (Death for gay men) Leviticus 21:17 - 23 (Ugly people, lame, dwarfs, not welcome on altar) Leviticus 25:45 (Strangers can be bought as slaves) Luke 12:33 (Sell your possessions, and give to the poor) Luke 14:26 (You must hate your family and yourself to follow Jesus) Mark 10:11 - 12 (Leaving your spouse for another is adultery) Mark 10:21 - 22 (Sell your possessions and give to the poor) Mark 10:24 - 25 (Next to impossible for rich to get into heaven) Mark 16:15 - 16 (Those who hear the gospel and don't believe go to hell) Matthew 5:17 - 19 (Jesus says he has come to enforce the laws of the Old Testament) Matthew 6:5 - 6 (Pray in secret) Matthew 6:18 (Fast for Lent in secret) Matthew 9:12 (The healthy don't need a doctor, the sick do) Matthew 10:34 - 37 (Jesus comes with sword, turns families against each other, those that love family more than him are not worthy) Matthew 12:30 (If you're not with Jesus, you're against him) Matthew 15:4 (Death for not honouring your father and mother) Matthew 22:29 (Jesus references Old Testament) Matthew 24:37 (Jesus references Old Testament) Numbers 14:18 (Following generations blamed for the sins of previous ones) Psalms 137:9 (Violence against children) Revelation 6:13 (The stars fell to earth like figs) Revelation 21:8 (Unbelievers, among others, go to hell) 1 Timothy 2:11 - 12 (Women subordinate and must remain silent) 1 Timothy 5:8 (If you don't provide for your family, you are an infidel)

The despicable terror attack, targeting young concert - goers at the Ariana Grande gig at the Manchester Arena, is the UK's equivalent of the Bataclan... More

This IS one more act in an on - going attack on Christianity.

But the more irenic tone he uses for speaking to his own Jewish community might win some of them over, while the more harshly attacked «genetic therapists and technologists» are likely to go away mad.

I went through it and the person who is doing all the attacking (the creator of the website, I presume) has flawed logic, quotes people I've never even heard off, and seems to be more anti-war than anything, while still wanting to be an objectivist.

Trying to split hairs about who's society or culture is more murderous is like trying to decide which wolf in a pack that has surrounded you is the «bad» one that is going to attack you first.

how come their is still no talk about Russia Orthodox church attacking freedom of expression by p4ss7 riot,... oh that's right because anything Christians do that's evil is left out of the MSM meanwhile their letting more Christians strip human right from people, your just going to let that country and their Christians get away with it,..

More than 600 men and women stormed a baptismal services of the Nachalat Yeshua congregation in Beersheba in 2005, attacking church goers and damaging property.

To go beyond these preliminary steps to abolish war would require far more drastic attacks on the political and economic roots of war.

The 2016 Monster Energy Welcome To Rockville Gourmet Man Food lineup includes: Bayou Bill's Cajun, Brucci's Pizza, Burrito Gallery, Captain Nemo's, Catullo Brothers Pizza, Char's Smokehouse BBQ, Cheese Louise, Chicago Taste Authority, Classic Home Cookin», Girls Gone Green Nacho Bar, Grinders Burger Barn, Hebros Kitchen, Highway 61, Iron Barley, Island Noodles, Knuckle Sandwiches, Mac Attack, Mama's Food, Mangroves, Mount Olympus Greek Fare, Mystery Melt Machine, Oli's Tots, Pie Baby, Pounders, Up In Smoke BBQ, and What's The Catch, with more to be announced.

Mertesacker is the type that will win headers that go towards him, but if he has to move for it then he's in trouble, but he's very good at positioning himself so it's not that big a deal, though when he does get caught out it seems to stick in my head for a while, like against Anderlecht... Players like Koscielny and Gabriel are a lot more mobile, they move and attack the ball when it's played into their area.

Klopp's teams have always played a high tempo game and will again today so i suspect posession will come and go easily both ways and for this reason i would go with Iwobi for a more attacking option and use campbell if needed to help protect a lead later in the game.

after our loss to everton i'm more confident now that we're going to win against man city we are going to want to bounce back and city missing key players like aguero, fernandinho, gundogan is a good time to play them and i want yaya toure to play we know that defensively he is useless so we can hit them on the counter attack!!

In Mahrez case, he is definitely a wide attacking player, who goes by opponents as if they are not there, has good technical abilities, a wonderful left foot, and does score goals, probably would score more in a team like Arsenal.

Then Gerard Pique decided it was about time he netted in a La Liga game and went up for an attack and managed to finish sublimely to make the score 6 - 2, a result that wasn't in fact flattering for the away side and could have in fact been far more impressive had it not been for Casillas.

But I had the enjoyment of seeing youngsters flourish into world beaters - not anymore I had the beautiful attacking football to compensate for the lack of trophies - wengerball no more I had that smugness when a signing was mocked but turned into a world beater - we spend over the odds on decent players and seem to tell ourselves «they need time» Wenger needs to go, what I listed above was supposed to in some way highlight what made him great.

You do have a point and I can not honestly disagree with that but with figure like Cech I would like to think that we'd have more confidence going forward and pinning back teams, watch Sczezny, he almost deliberately invites attacks to show off his reflexes, Ospina came in and cut that crap especially by constantly organizing his defense but physically not built up enough for a world class goalkeeper, we lost three points to Swansea for that reason [Befitimbi Gomis» goal - line technology goal?]

- chambers must be banned from playing right back he is going to cost us in a game very soon, he has been taken apart in more than three games, most teams use his side to attack whenever he plays, i think flamini is a better prospect till debuchy and jenkinson come back.

Barkok has recently been picked for the Germany Under19 side and according to the German publication Spox, Wenger has been watching this exciting attacking midfielder for some time and after being turned down last summer he has now gone back with another offer that is «no more than # 10m».

spend 25 millions and then we do not have to lose a GEM like him to go for the EPL nor spend more money in attacking transfers 2017 - 2018 season.

He has proven to be more than a poacher so far with his hold up play and ability to keep attacks going.

Some are now saying we should have went with a more attacking team.

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

The team with Anthony Davis is just probably going to shoot more FTs if Lillard isn't attacking the rim, which he hasn't been.

As a public figure, you have to be far more careful what you say if you're gonna attack someone, after they casually ask you to race.

We need to be smart about how we go about being more attacking.

The «big» conundrum Going by his physical semblance, Wilshere is not the man mountain to play in that No. 4 role, where he would have to be physically robust and concentrate a lot more on his defensive duties, instead of harnessing his slick attacking skills.