Sentences with phrase «what's good for readers»

We spent over 400 hours reviewing the top mortgage lenders before selecting the best for our readers.

MMM, on the other hand, did filter out many deals that were awful, in favor or several that were good for the readers.

Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will be good for my readers.

I don't need to see a button on the site but maybe it'd be good for the readers, just so they know you're over there (I say that because I know some people don't care about it — definitely not being snarky:)-RRB- And thank you!

This is an unsolicited review, and I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will be good for my readers.

Please rest assured - we only recommend products and services that we use personally and believe will be good for our readers.

With a love of the arts, the desire to create beautiful products with purpose and great function Julie is now on the hunt to find the BEST of the BEST for our readers.

I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will be good for my readers.

Regardless, I only recommend products or services I use personally and believe will be good for my readers.

It is always evolving and I am always asking myself what works best for my readers and is still authentic for me.

Regardless, I only recommend products I use personally and believe will be good for my readers.

I feel this is better for my readers so that you can get more ideas on how to style your items in new ways too.

Regardless, I only recommend products or services I believe will be good for my readers and are from companies I can recommend.

Why good for readers?

Good for readers to see a book has been edited, good for editors, and good for authors who should see their work sell more if this idea takes off.

They have struggled to get their works better known, have done countless promos for their books and have tirelessly poured over their books time and time again in order to constantly try and better them for the reader's enjoyment.

It's also good for readers, because different readers like to shop in different online stores.

Whether you program your eBook yourself, or hire an eBook conversion firm like AuthorImprints to help you, you are ultimately responsible for making sure your book looks and reads well for your readers.

For me, a major concern has been what's best for my readers.

Competition is good for readers and for authors.

Every time I wondered what to do, I consulted my mantra: I needed to do what I thought would be best for my readers, because I believed if I took care of them, they would take care of me.

Today, Amazon announced that it is working on a new set of features that will make Kindle even better for these readers as well as a meaningful breakthrough device for the blind.

I have been struck by the lack of attention paid to the topic of what's best for readers, in the blogs themselves and in the comments.

With a little research, self - publishers are able to learn the tricks of the trade, and to varying degrees, make the desired end product look good for readers.

His take is this is actually good for readers and it's good for writers.

By incorporating the following system, I believe Amazon could make the Kindle Store better for both readers and authors (many of whom are writing great books that struggle to be seen through the trash).

Competition is essential to the continued healthy growth of the ebook community, and the stronger that B&N gets, the better for readers.

Second, I thought it would be better for the reader to come to conclusions about the likely effect of these events.

Aquafadas initially released its Cloud Authoring tool as a streamlined process for publishers looking to make their digital magazines and newspapers even better for readers on Kobo's line of devices and on personal computers.

But this new title from New York Times bestselling author Katie MacAlister is actually such a new concept in digital publishing, that is actually works well for the reader.

If it's a good thing for readers to be able to buy books for $ 1.99 on Amazon, it's surely just as good for readers to be able to buy Rachel Kaddish or Barbara Trapido at whatever price they're willing to pay.

This is what we're still missing - someone who can argue how traditional publishing creates a system that's better for readers.

It's good for SEO, good for your readers.

Yes, those options would be far better for the reader than avoiding the emotion.

The present upgrade of the software promises to make things even better for the readers who would now be able to open far more e-books in many more different formats than before.

I suspect things are much better for readers / authors in the States in regards to Amazon, but it's dismal for the rest of us.

That isn't the subject of this piece, but it is something that is generally good for readers and authors both, because it keeps the stale reviews from dominating and making your book look dated.

> This line of inquiry does not consider at all whether a subscription service might be good for readers.

And by the way, since I'm so damnably cranky: Last week I noticed someone saying the indie revolution was a good thing for creators but wasn't any good for readers.

KU is only good for readers if the content they want is there, and exclusivity is a major deterrent to quality content (I.e. once a book takes hold it's not desirable to the author).

The way I see it, subscription services work well for readers particularly if it's a «one stop shop» sort of deal.

This novel would be better for those readers who have a familiarity with Austen's works, as well as the Bronte's and other authors of the same time and similar genres.

Editing costs money, but it makes the experience better for the reader, so the money is spent on it.

While these programs are good for readers, they may not always be the most beneficial for authors, except in that they expand the reading (not necessarily buying) audience for your work.

The genres that perform the best for their readers are romance, contemporary fiction, historical fiction, mystery, thrillers, and Christian fiction.

That can only be good for readers.

Nancy is helping to bring back out of print books, and that will be good for readers.

I think the longer one gets more information into it and therefore is better for the reader.

So focus on «what's best for Readers».

Yes subscription services are good for the readers and will definitely stay.