And no, I actually have no idea
what Biblical arguments you are referring to (although I would not try to undermine marriage and believe it important).
Not exact matches
By contrast the second kind of
argument mounted under the banner of process hermeneutics supports a claim that such - and - such a tenet of process theology is «
Biblical theology» in the sense of being compatible with
what some
Biblical texts say on a theological topic.
In these
arguments the move from data consisting of
Biblical texts construed in a certain way to conclusions concerning
what truly is a tenet in some
Biblical theology is warranted by process hermeneutics, strictly understood, i.e., a process theory of understanding.
To critics of
biblical inerrancy, it sounds like we Christians are making the same
argument as this man uses: Is this
what we do with Scripture?
You still might not agree with it, but at least you will have an accurate representation of
what is taught, and the opportunity to bring a
biblical argument against it.
Historical
arguments between their faiths have rarely if ever been over
what to call Abraham's God or who was invoked by that call, and Islamic salvation history is rooted in the conviction that there is a lasting continuity between the dispensations of Muhammad, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and the
biblical and extrabiblical prophets.