Sentences with phrase «what hawking»

«People want to know what Hawking thinks,» says Sabine Hossenfelder, a cosmologist at the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics in Stockholm.

What if this was all just a computer glitch and none of this is what Hawking really meant to say?

Read what Hawking had to say (nothing like you're suggesting): http://www.hawking.org.uk/quantum-cosmology-m-theory-and-the-anthropic-principle.html

But what Hawking calls the whole universe seems to exclude microbes and humans and falling in love.

Anyone who says that Hawking is wrong is doing exactly what Hawking is doing.

Which is not AT ALL on par with what Hawking said.

I am asking what you are asserting regarding what Hawking believes.

What Hawking was saying was that he felt that it was possible that life on this planet came from aliens... How is that any different?

If you don't like what Hawking believes, then don't believe him.

I had only a crude knowledge of mathematics, so I didn't understand half of what Hawking wrote, at least at first.

What Hawking wrote represented a digestible guide to the limits of human knowledge.

Why don't you model out what HAWK would be worth if the company continues to limp along for another 2 - 3 years, with 60 % of rigs remaining idle, management continuing to sit on their idle rig inventory neither scrapping nor selling, and the company continuing to burn through ~ $ 10m (adjusted) in OCF each quarter?

Not exact matches

If you hear this message loud and clear, one big question remains — if supervising compulsory hours of violin practice and hawk - like attention to grades isn't the answer, what is?

Dr Nick Tothill, Senior Lecturer for Computational Imaging, Visual Science & Computational Astrophysics at Western Sydney University, said Hawking had the rare knack of asking unusual but illuminating questions such what really happens at the event horizon of a black hole?

But the restaurant company has a mission statement that sounds pretty similar to what other fast - casual brands are hawking.

They're the opposite of deficit hawks, the first to ask «so what?»

But what about hawks and doves?

What Stephen Hawking Missed: Small Biotechs Developing Promising Cell Therapies for Devastating Disease Source: Streetwise Reports (5/2/18) In the second of a two - part series exploring the disruptive cell therapy space, Maxim Group analyst Jason McCarthy takes a look at small - cap companies targeting big - ticket indications and their potential to drive blockbuster value for both patients and investors.

What we have observed and learned leads many, such as Stephen Hawking, to realize that no Creator is required.

Meanwhile, to Hawking's supporters who suggest that I am not owning up to his scientific «proofs,» I believe airwx has already said it best for me — he's a THEORETICAL physicist, and having read some of his work, I'm smart enough to know that much of what he says about God is an exercise in jumping to conclusions, even as sound as much of his scientific work is.

You misrepresent what he said... basically trying to create a strawman to discredit Hawking.

Theo What did you imply by saying, «Just look at Stephen Hawking and how he believes that life ion this planet was seeded bt aliens.»?

The hawk rested As the squirrel died, As I told myself What I knew to be true: This isn't cruelty Or even desire.

Hawking is correct that you do not go to heaven after you die, however heaven does exsist... it is what we today call outer space.

In Hawking's comment about how people there is no afterlife for broken down computer parts comment, how does he explain what people see when they have a near death experience?

While I'm more of an atheist than anything else and respect Mr. Hawking's vast knowledge of the sciences and believe he's probably correct in his assertions I also believe that NO ONE really knows what's in store for us after death... most likely nothing at all since that's what makes sense to me, but all the brains in our world put together don't really know for sure.

My scientific colleagues in Oxford and London are puzzled by Hawking's bold declarations about God, mainly because they are such speculative interpretations of what is already a very speculative theory.

I like Mr. Hawking and I respect his immense effort to understand what is this thing we call reality... bravo and keep trying...

So what about Hawking's latest book?

First of all, I can't imagine why anyone would be interested in what Stephen Hawking thinks about Heaven.

I don't think you meant what you said in the following statement: «And Not like most of us... Mr. Hawking has not put forth a «proven» Final Theory or the Theory of Everything...»

There are three simple facts that he can not refute which bring his claim of «no heaven» into question: (1) Like all of us... Stephen Hawking doesn't know... what he doesn't know.

Although another poster here points out that what I have read on Hawking may not be true so I'm open to that as well I suppose.

Dr. Hawking would agree with everything I said about what modern astrophysicists believe happened in the first few milliseconds of the big bang.

For example, the Bible says that time was created by God when He created the universe.19 Stephen Hawking, George Ellis, and Roger Penrose extended the equations for general relativity to include space and time, demonstrating that time began at the formation of the universe.20 Of course, the biggest coup of the Bible was to declare that the universe had a beginning21 through an expanding universe model.22 The New Testament even declares that the visible creation was made from what was not visible and that dimensions of length, width and height were created by God.23 In addition, the Bible refuted steady - state theory (saying that the creation of matter and energy has ended) 24 long before science made that determination.

Stephen Hawking for instance, actually tried honestly to put that in logical terms and failed, but he's sincere in it and know what he's talking about.

When modern scientists such as Einstein and Stephen Hawking mention «God» in their writings, this is what they seem to mean: that God is Nature.»

I have read a lot of Hawking, but that's not what I'm talking about.

The conclusion by Hawking and his associates is that we should not exist based on what we know and the process we assume to be laws therefore we have gotten something wrong or we need new information.

Hawking continues: «What is the explanation of why we have not been visited?

In his A Brief History of Time, Hawking gave his version of what the Pope had said:

I believe that God is all knowing and he knows what everyone believes — even Mr. Hawking who I respect for what he has made of his life.

In my view heaven exists, God exists and while Stephen Hawking can exercise his free speech and think I find it so strange that he spends so much time trying to disprove «what he believes does not exist».

Hawking is basing his disbelief, on what is known at this time.

Sriram, on what grounds do you base your statement that Dr. Hawking does not have any «fresh insights»?

What's most disturbing though, is that you think that Stephen Hawking speaks things that feel «logical» to him, as if there is no basis in fact.

mr. hawking., i moved my mouse all aver the figure... what i saw it looked like a baby human, also somekind of red arm just appeard on one of the sides.

Hawking is smarter than what you all think.

Gosh... what I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall in heaven when Dr. Hawking walks in and God and everybody jumps out from behind the curtains and screams, «SURPRISE!!!!!»

It's that time of year once again — when the air turns crisp, halls get decked with boughs of holly and our crack team of culture hawks predict what the coming 12...