Sentences with phrase «what hebrews»

Genesis 14 implies what Hebrews 7 makes explicitly clear: Abraham gave a tenth of the spoils of war to Melchizedek.

We talked for quite some time about what Hebrews 8:10 - 12 really implies...

@magfl... ~ ~ ~ ~ Actually, I prefer to go with what Hebrews 11:1 says «faith» is...: «Faith is the confidence that what we hope for will actually happen; it gives us assurance about things we can not see.»

David read the whole sentence and then read the whole book, then go and study what the Hebrews were doing at that time, falling into paganism, specifically the babylonian stuff going on.

That's what Hebrews 10:26 is saying.

This is to davidnfran hay David you might have brought this up in a previous post I haven't read, but i did read quit a bit about your previous comments and replies at the beginning of this blog, so I was just wondering in light of what hebrews 6 and 10 say how would you enterprite passages like romans 8 verses 28 thrue 39 what point could paul have been trying to make in saying thoughs amazing things in romans chapter 8 verses 28 thrue 39 in light of hebrews 6 and 10, Pauls says that god foreknew and also predestined thoughs whom he called to be conformed to the image of his son so that he would be the first born among many brothers and then he goes on saying that neither death nor life nor angels nor rulers nor things present nor things to come nor powers nor hight nor death can ever separate us from the love of god in christ jesus so how would i inturprate that in light of that warning in hebrews 6 and 10,

You would think that in the year 2011 most people would know what the Hebrew language sounds like... I find it rediculous the way people were reacting!!!

these and other factors tend in many minds to undo what the Hebrew - Christian development did.

the Revised Version declines a literal rendering and disguises what the Hebrew says in euphemisms — «heart» or «inward parts.»

This is not actually what the Hebrew text says.

Having studied biblical theology in graduate school (part of the time under a conservative Rabbi) and currently studying theology at the Pontificia Universita Gregorian in Rome as a seminarian, I regard Meir Soloveichik's biblical theology as unrepresentative of what the Hebrew Scriptures teach.

Hi Want To Know what Hebrew 12:17 Mean about Not To sell Your Birthright i Read it But Im Confuse Because I want to Repent from all my Sin But This Confuse me

but notice that in Leviticus 17:14 we are provided with an explicit explanation of what the Hebrew nation was discussing when blood came into the discussion: In plenty of ancient rituals it was clear that blood was a physical manifestation of life - force and consuming blood of another was an attempt to steal the life that God had given that individual being.

Propagate the natural reading of the account from a version true to the Hebrew (such as nkjv): godly men marrying women for their beauty producing a generation of ungodly «men of renown;» and lead people to scholarly sites where they can see what the Hebrew says and compare the Biblical basis for the various interpretations, such as Who Were The Nephilim, Genesis.6 & Numbers 13 A Fresh Look, by Bodie Hodge at Answers in Genesis.

That isn't what the Hebrew indicates and even if it said, «Thou shalt not kill», one has only to flip a few pages to see other commands that God gives right in that same passage that demand that the state, in this case the nation of Israel, take the life of criminals for certain crimes.»

What the Hebrew Scriptures set up theocratically, the New Testament knocks down eschatologically.

Not sure what the Hebrew word is for deoxyribonucleic acid but, that would be hard to pass down from generation to generation in a picture language.

No matter what Hebrew lesson I read about it, the story is always the same.

Not exact matches

Hi Savannah — I liked your comment so i checked it out... this is what I found... the word is kamelos, (kam» - ay - los of Hebrew origin) meaning a «camel».

Jordan, if you keep using Hebrew words, people don't know what you are saying.

The Hebrew concepts of heaven and hell are so different from what we are taught and the concept of the Kingdom is radically different.

unless we seek to understand the Hebrew thought of the day we can't really begin to understand what the N.T. is saying.

As to those who reject God (the foreign nations around the Hebrew from which they could buy slaves) what is sin to them.

What we are getting is the attempt to express the Hebrew thought in the Greek language and Greek thought which is totally different from the Hebrew.

They say, «you can't trust God's Word because you don't know the languages, so you will have to follow and trust me to tell you what God is saying because i am a Greek or Hebrew scholar».

What is really fascinating is the theory that the Hebrew and Muslim deity figure derive from a war god in an ancient Semitic pantheon whose association with the other gods was lost in the confusion that time and oral tradition bring.

If we also keep in mind Isaiah 45:7, this divergence in theology becomes explainable and the contradiction is exposed for what it probably is; a shift in the theology of the Hebrews, influenced by the dualistic Persian religion at the time of the Persian's conquest of Babylon in around 539 BCE.

the problem is that ppl read the bible thats been translated, if you realy want to know what was said youll need to study hebrew... every letter has a meaning... every word isnt a perfect fit for english,, theres nuances and cultural differences that youll find,,, its a whole new thing to go back and look at the bible through hebrew eyes,,, they arent required to look like us,,, were supposed to look more like them,,, yashua was a jew,,,, all the apostles were jews, yashua was sent to the lost sheep of the house of israel, not the gentiles, paul took it to the gentiles, and he never stopped being and living as a jew, the laws are very viable today, but they do nt give salvation, thats what yashua did...

Too bad you know NOTHING about the ancient Hebrews, what and how they thought about evil.

Thus Jews and Christians, both informed by what they have learned about the integrity of creation from the Hebrew Bible, need not try to invent ecological ethics de novo.

I have heard many different theologians debate whether the behemoth was a crocodile or a hippo and some say it refered to a dino of some kind, none had any more proof than conjecturing about what the ancient hebrew words to describe it really meant.

«what is hard to understand — the word order, or the word in that... lets see it from the top please... hebrew, greek, latin — in that order too... and yes it was completed... the bible that is held in the vatician is containing the old and the new and its in latin... whoa!»

This is what Leviticus and Hebrews both say.

But it does not mean God does everything for us — we are responsible for our participation and 2 acts of atonement — reprentance and charity — we are now priests according to Hebrew of this sanctuary — we need to learn what that means and how to be a «priest».

Until you can read all of the Old Testament in Hebrew and New Testament in Greek you have no authority to tell anyone what is or is not twisted scripture.

Instead, their «hearts were fixed on what was far greater» (Hebrews 11:16).

The Old Testament, in its Hebrew and Greek versions, wasn't included, nor were the later chapter and verse divisions (those came in the thirteenth and sixteenth centuries respectively), which makes these earliest codices similar, in some ways, to what Green's Bibliotheca project is attempting.

You only have what religions have said that this alleged «God» and «Jesus» said and want and demand, beginning with the Hebrew religion and then onto the Christian religion... or does your Jesus have a different story and attributes and characteristics than they have presented?

matt - what is hard to understand — the word order, or the word in that... lets see it from the top please... hebrew, greek, latin — in that order too... and yes it was completed... the bible that is held in the vatician is containing the old and the new and its in latin... whoa!

It is not known on what calendar day God gave the Hebrews His Commandments and what calendar day was the first working day for them.

Do tell us, what did the Sumerians mean by that when they came up with the story long before it was plagiarized by the Hebrews?

The book of Hebrews affirms the connection between God's presence and our contentment and says, «Keep your lives free from the love of money and be content with what you have, because God has said, «Never will I leave you; never will I forsake you.

Certainly, some things we believe in can been seen, but the great faith described in the rest of Hebrews 11 is the faith that is confident in God's promises based on what is known about God's character and God's Word.

What if the Chinese, Irish, Romans, Polynesians, Greeks, or even Hebrews found it first?

Hebrews 11:1 This is an intelligent definiton of what faith is.

Regardless of whether this was just an old Hebrew method of deciding what to eat dependent on observation; the test of scientific fact does not pass.

The new testament (Hebrews 8:8) * And in the Torah, the old testament (Jeremiah 31:31) What names are written on the kingdom gates of new Jerusalem coming down to earth?

Many «Christians» aren't familiar with the Greek, Hebrew or Aramaic texts — including quite a few pastors — so they don't know what they are talking about either.

I didn't catch how this makes the Hebrew bible unique or more inspired than all other religious / spiritual texts, but it doesn't matter, the message is what matters.

Hebrews 11:3 «3 By faith we understand that the worlds were prepared by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things which are visible.»