Sentences with phrase «what j»

I did find this one that shows a super narrow staircase, which is exactly what J & K are going to need, so that it doesn't stick out into their living room too much.

The question is what J & M or anybody else can do about the outside capital ban.

The judge ordered roughly equal parenting time, which was what J had said he wanted.

I think the reason that J Crew jewelry has been such a success is because what I like and what J Crew represents was a good combination.

I received exactly what j expected.

People often ask me what J's favorite toys are.

Not sure what the J stands for, but he'll be back tomorrow.

J. Harry «got ta know what the J stands for — it's killing me» McCaffrey did go 2 for 3 from the dish in the game.

The present intention of the story is to give expression to what J and all true Yahwists in Israel deemed to be the essence of the relationship, not as in Genesis I between God and all creation, but pointedly and existentially, between Yahweh and man.

You know what J?

Here's what Jered Weaver said of Kyle Seager calling time with both feet in the better's box... pic.twitter.com/oUL 6jIsDRO

Not exact matches

Whether you've had an insurance salesman aggressively pitch you a 702 (j) «retirement plan» or you've read information about it online, you may still be wondering what it is.

But if the Facebook Like is protected speech because it ostensibly communicates «the user's approval... and support» of the person, status or thing liked, as Traxler wrote, then what of liking things sarcastically or in jest, or — to use an example from another social network — of «hate - favoriting» on Twitter?

To express visually the relationship between stability and openness, and to suggest what it means for people looking to do business abroad, I came up with what I call the J curve.

Otherwise most spectators, enthusiast and analysts still have to be patient and it is surely too early to judge to what extent the J - 20 can match the stealth properties of the F - 22 Raptor and F - 35 Lightning II or how far its avionics are comparable.

«What is striking at the moment is the lack of a broader consensus between policy makers about what monetary policy can achieve and what it should do in the current situation,» said Jan Bopp, asset allocation strategist at Bank J Safra SaraWhat is striking at the moment is the lack of a broader consensus between policy makers about what monetary policy can achieve and what it should do in the current situation,» said Jan Bopp, asset allocation strategist at Bank J Safra Sarawhat monetary policy can achieve and what it should do in the current situation,» said Jan Bopp, asset allocation strategist at Bank J Safra Sarawhat it should do in the current situation,» said Jan Bopp, asset allocation strategist at Bank J Safra Sarasin.

But in any case a weaker euro would certainly help and that's what we're seeing,» says John J Hardy, Saxo's head of forex strategy.

Interviewed by J Lynn Fraser of Human Resource Professional magazine, a national B2B magazine, on succession and what companies / HR departments can do to help employees for change from or loss of a beloved / visionary leader, June 17, 2013.

J — this is about what the PATIENT wants to talk about, not what YOU or the PROFESSOR wants them to talk about.

I remember when they did this in the past with what they called «the word made fresh»... Pretty terrible... I mean why not make a ebonics bible where they're all «yo yo wassup J - rock»?

you are going to take one thing from histrory and repeatedly smear it across J C because this is the result... you get someone like hitler with little tinges from the heart that are what we call murderous hatred.

[25] The holy pastor did not in any way ask people to imitate him, but to anexceedingly overweight penitent who asked him what she should do, he replied, half in jest, «Three Lents».

It reveals, as well, what we are to commend for the common good in every society in which we find ourselves, praying and working for its welfare (Jer 29:7).

And so in verse 41 and 42, He weeps over the city because they did not recognize what day it was (cf. Jer 6:26; 8:18 - 9:3; Lam 1:1 - 4)!

It is s @ d (very s @ d) what happened to J @ pan but I am not surprised at what happened.

Originally the name of a valley just south of Jerusalem where child - sacrifice to the god Moloch was practiced (2 Kings 23:10; cf. Jer 7:31 - 32; 32:35), by the time of Jesus it had come to symbolize what our word «hell» signifies.

J John explains what authentic revival looks like and explains how Christians can get ready for it More

@Weep4America, Although I strongly disagree with Steve's comment, even in jest, what beliefs or tenets of «atheism» is he being hypocritical of?

The mark of the beast is spiritual, and identical to the pledged of allegiance to the flag, because worshipping doesn't come from a chip, or any technology device, although we are surrounded by human devices... The name of the beast is going to be written in the heart, or in the mind on those who worship the beast, because worshipping is of the heart, or of the mind... When the Germans used their right hand to pledge allegiance to the flag, or to Hitler, there was no physical mark in the right hand, or forehead of the German pledger, because the pledge of allegiance to the flag, or to Hitler, was written in the heart, or in the mind of the German pledger... When the US uses their right hand to pledge allegiance to the flag, there is no physical mark in the right hand, or on the forehead of the pledger, because the pledge of allegiance to the flag, is written in the heart, or in the mind of the pledger... The devil uses Romans 13 to deceive those who are pledging allegiance to the flag, because they do not believe what God said in Ex.20: 1 - 5, and De.4: 15 - 19... When a person pledges allegiance to a man, or to a flag, or to a nation, they are heading for destruction, because God said; «cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and make flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD Jer.17: 5 KJV... Whatever happened to the Germans who trusted in Hitler, or on their military power?

J McDermott SJ, «Faith, Reason, and Freedom» in Irish Theological Quarterly 67 (2002), 307 - 32, for the intellectual grounding of the balance of finite and infinite necessary for freedom, and «What Went Wrong with Catholic (NT) Exegesis and Christology?»

J John explains what authentic revival looks like and explains how Christians can get ready for it

There are general, vague guidelines (cf. Exod 16:29; 34:21; 35:3; Jer 17:22; Amos 8:5; Neh 13:15 - 22), but the Old Testament contains very little specific instructions on what it means not to work on the Sabbath.

J, Jesus would be punished for what He did because man still holds man's law above God's law in this country.

But what comes between these «J» stories?

The then Republican candidate for President of the United States of America, Donald J Trump was clear: «You've got to go back and look and study and see what happens,» he said.

While these books are not as great history or literature as the David stories or the writings of «J» and «E,» they are our chief source of information as to what happened between the return from exile in 538 B.C. and the rise of the Maccabees in 168 B.C..

J: What about the scampering skeleton from Pocket Guide to the Apocalypse?

(Jer 32:17).3 What is narrated at the very beginning of the biblical record, God's creating of all that is, also pervades the subsequent literature down through the prophets and the Wisdom tradition.4

Well... J Robert Oppenheimer reflecting on what they, as scientists, had done, famously quoted the Bhagavad - Gita: «Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.».

The author of Hebrews points at what the Holy Spirit said through the prophet Jeremiah about the new covenant (Jer 31:33 - 34), and then ties this together with the word «remission» (aphesis) which was used in Hebrews 9:22.

There can be no doubt that what we identify in the Tetrateuch (Genesis - Numbers) as P employs and incorporates in the fifth century some material as old or possibly older than J. And J in the tenth century may well have had as a primary source an earlier effort to bring together coherently a wide assortment of stories deemed to have significant bearing on the life of the people Israel.2 Certainly individual units in the J corpus had been in existence for centuries before they were integrated; and beyond any doubt these units were often strikingly modified in meaning in the context of the J work.

And we find in Ezekiel, as in Jeremiah, what has been called perhaps inadvisedly a «doctrine of individualism» The two prophets quote, in order to refute it, the same proverb: «The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge» (Jer.

One is apparently to regard the lavish praise of the author J as an acceptable substitute for praise of God, without bothering to consider what the fictional «J writer» might have thought of such a distinction.

The second prong of the response acknowledges, it would seem, the validity of Moses» protest - but overcomes it in the affirmation, «I will be with your mouth and teach you what you shall speak» (vs. 12; see also the similar exchange between the Lord and Jeremiah, Jer.

And I freely admit I sometimes use too many extraneous, space - consuming, overly - descriptive, qualifying, words or sentences written quickly and in a stream - of - conscientiousness, run - on sort of fashion with occasional typos mostly due to fatigue of being up way too late (which also explains this post in general) after a long day of political discussion which refreshingly had little religious content though of course there is often much overlap between the two but posting is barely a hobby but more of an occasional passtime so now i wonder if what I write could be considered abuse as I've can't really recall seeing much if any sorrt of «text filibustering» not that this is exactly filibustering more a spontaneous text performance response joke and meant in jest to be absurdly long and useless so of course i hope you appreciate the spirit.

Rosenberg is clearly at the paraphrastic end of the band, freeing himself from what he calls «literal word for word slavery» in order to render the syntactical and contextual nuances, the assonance and word play, that characterize J's narrative style.

What we have termed J and E are both here, with other voices, or other hands.

While there are numerous points of disagreement in detail among source critics as to what is or is not J, he follows a fairly standard breakdown, such as can be found in any of the critical Introductions to the Old Testament, with a few modifications of his own, especially in the Joseph story.

Abandoning the standard chapter and verse divisions, he sets out J's narrative in continuous prose, redividing it into 178 paragraphs according to what he takes to be the natural breaks in the story.

If you are tired of reading commentaries on Exodus that seem to do nothing but talk about the Documentary Hypothesis (aka the JEDP theory), and if you have sometimes found yourself yelling at the pages «I don't care if was the J, E, D, or P source, just tell me what the text means!!!»