Sentences with phrase «what about birth»

What about the birth parents» attitudes?

What about their birth certificates?

What about the birth certificate?

What about birth control?

but what about birth control?

And if abortion at birth minus two hours is murder, what about birth minus two days?

Not exact matches

We're still learning more each week about what the birth defects associated with the virus looks like, and how long it stays in humans.

After the birth of her first child, Mayer returned to work after two weeks, and was inundated with self - righteous tut - tutting over what her truncated leave said about the kind of mother she is.

It isn't because there aren't people without jobs out there, but rather because many of those people, either from birth or from discouragement of being without work, are not thinking about the bigger picture, «making the employer happy» as much as they are following what they are told «fill in that sheet of numbers.»

This fond remembrance of the birth, growth and exploitation led us to talk about what Inbound Marketing means today.

If they agree to Mr. Avenatti's terms, Ms. Clifford can speak openly about not only the sexual relationship she claims to have had with Mr. Trump shortly after his wife, Melania, gave birth to the couple's son, Barron, but also about what she describes as an effort to silence her with «hush money.»

What do the Seer Stones of the Mormon faith say about stem cell research or a woman's access to birth control?

Let me add I have not seen your 3 posts asking me about how I feel about it before now when I copied and posted those above and If I had seen before I would have answered you with out any hesitation but did not because I moved to other blogs... And to satisfy you interest my saying I do not like it as a cultural habit but if religion failed to stop it and had to regulate it then what can I do about it... people can still lie and give you an elder age and how can you tell if 9 - 10or more at villages there are no birth certificate issued nor villagers interested to obtain it... what can you tell from their teeth like sheep??

Commenting on criticism surround the Virgin Birth, Very Rev Michael Sadgrove said: «He wasn't deconstructing the meaning of the Gospel, he wasn't in any way devaluing what the tradition has to say about faith.

what about arranged marriages at birth..

And what about that partial - birth abortion case a few years back?

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

To my mind, it accords better with what we know about the laws impressed upon matter by the Creator that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of the individual... There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been breathed into a few forms or into one...»

No theologian or counter-circumstance-experience can take away from what I know, what many mothers the world over know in their heart of hearts about loss and birth and raising babies and real transformation: it's Love and it is sacred and it is human and it all redeems.

Access to birth control and education on the proper uses (like, even if you're on birth control, the guy should still wear a condom) of it, as well as true education about intercourse, what causes disease and how giving birth affects the female body is one of the most responsible things we can help the poor with.

What I love about this is, the awesome thought that blood was shed in this case to birth something rather than in the second instance to supposedly fix the problem of sin.

«Thinking Catholics, who knew what had happened in Rome before the encyclical, who had absorbed all that Vatican II had to say about the Church as the People of God, had assumed that their concerns would be listened to and change in the Church's stance on birth control was inevitable.»

I am simply trying to understand you correctly.From what you stated, I am wondering about your take on the virgin birth, the miracles and healing Jesus performed and his resurrection?

Indeed, there are a number of problems in knowing anything about what transpired around the birth of Jesus that appear to be insurmountable.

Why would anyone care what a bunch of bishops have to say about birth control?

Before he did, he was able to make amends to her and his two children for all the times he failed them; and what is more, he beat doctor's predictions about his mortality, living to witness the birth of his twin grandsons.

and then they are excommunicated and the fight is over... this is a hopeless fight especially when religion is involved... they either fight for rights and lose it all (and essentially go to hell) or give in and listen to their religious leaders... I do not believe in what they do and could care less really but they are in a no win situation and they as nuns should not be worried about birth control or anything of the such... they took the vows..

Lately I've been interested in what sort of difference could be made if «dialogue» became less focused on understanding why someone believes what they do (in light of the way I belief) and more about understanding the way those beliefs are held in the context of the experiences that helped birth them.

I'm waiting for the restaurant to come out and say what they think about other topics near and dear to the GOP's hearts like birth control and immigrants.

but whats wrong about the birth of the bible jesus is he was not born during the winter he was born during nice weather sheep did not stay in the fields at night in the winter.

What would happen if... the idea of developing human beings was considered so important and vital that each neighborhood had within walking distance a Family Growth Center which was a center for learning about being human, from birth to death?

In fact it contradicts itself starting in THE VERY FIRST TWO CHAPTERS of Genesis when the order of creation is mixed up to having only 2 of the 4 Gospel writers bothering to talk about the birth of Jesus (and those two accounts conflict with each other while also providing timelines which make it IMPOSSIBLE for Jesus to have been born based on their accounts) to 3 of the 4 Gospel writers not agreeing on what the final words of Jesus were.

By that time various legends about Jesus were growing steadily, such as that of the Virgin Birth, and the more miraculous stories of what he did during his earthly ministry.

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

But what amazes me about mormonism, is how similar its birth story is to Islam.

No theologian or experience can take away from what I know in my heart of hearts now, what many mothers the world over know in their heart of hearts about birth and raising babies and real transformation.

What was it that made talking about birth so taboo from the pulpit?

Something has been indicated by what was said about Jesus» birth, but there is more to say.

What the generation before them took for granted about divorce, or mixed marriages, or birth control, or segregation, or homosexuality they begin to debate and discard.

Here it is of no use to have Abraham for one's father, nor to have seventeen ancestors — he who will not work must take note of what is written about the maidens of Israel, for he gives birth to wind, but he who is willing to work gives birth to his own father.

His nine months of silence only magnified his obedience at the birth of his son when there was a controversy about what to name him, and Zacharias wrote on a tablet, «His name is John» (1:63).

Every Christmas the politically correct secularists and biased media dictate to us; the Christian majority about what we can say and do to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, it's time to let them know we've had enough of their interference in our most personal beliefs.

The matter of what happened on the night in question in the city of David when there was no room in the inn is not really about anything — unless there is something more to this child than a birth in poverty into an indifferent world.

On the other hand, what about the eight - and - a-half-month-old fetus, two weeks away from birth?

This stretch is bad enough but what's worse is how Prothero's disdain for Santorum manifests itself repeatedly throughout the piece in a petty ad hominem like «Saint Santorum» and resurrecting the deliberating misleading conflation of Santorum's personal beliefs about birth control with his public policy stance.

If you think you're better qualified to decide what to do about someone else's pregnancy, then you should step up and offer to pay for all expenses related to the birth, including lost wages for the woman and all medical expenses, no matter how extensive.

While maintaining a reverent agnosticism about what happened physically, can we not look on the Resurrection as the birth of the Church and the continuation of its life through the ages?

And in the book of I Samuel this is describing the birth of David in I Samuel 16, and 17, the child that was born from of old, forever lasting, and of his «SEED» in Micah 5:2, as was again prophesied in Genesis 49:9 - 12, out of Judah, and whose «seed» is what YHWH talks about all through this book of remembrance, its» true name, named by YHWH in Malachi 3:16.

Consider the titles: The Hidden Feelings of Motherhood: Coping with Stress, Depression and Burnout; The Mask of Motherhood: How Becoming a Mother Changes Everything and Why We Pretend it Doesn't; and Life After Birth: What Even Your Friends Won't Tell You About Motherhood.

I have no memory of that experience, thus I can hardly constitute it phenomenologically, but I have made my birth a part of my consciousness by internalizing what I have been told about it.