Not exact matches
So they're kind of the same in some deep mathematical sense, and as of today we don't really know
what happens at the center of a
black hole and we don't really know
what happened at the moment of the big bang so these are two puzzles that are cousins of one another and anything that we learn
about one is certainly going to shed light on the other.»
We cant even see
whats on the other side of the Moon, and we are led to believe
about a
black hole Billions of light years away based on a telescope?
It's so easy to slip into that
black hole of self - hate, but when you hear from others, it gives you a little bit more strength and more courage to stop fretting
about what's on the other end of the fork.
At the launch in the City of London, Mr Clegg accused the other parties of «kidding people»
about what he called the «big
black hole in the public finances».
As Britain's energy
black hole grows larger, has anyone in government got a grip on
what we're doing
about it?
If this Conservative government cared
about Britain and
what makes our country great, they would not be running headlong towards a hard Brexit that will blow a # 220 billion
black hole in the budget.
The project continues to detect waves from similar events, offering new and incredible details
about what happens when these
black holes crash and warp the spacetime around them.
This week, Stephen Hawking, the most famous living scientist, changed his mind
about what black holes are.
The idea of matter escaping the alleged point - of - no - return was surprising (it's a central plot point in that other recent movie
about black holes, the biographical The Theory of Everything), but the fate of information that falls into the
black hole was
what really troubled Hawking's colleagues.
In 2016, Hawking and colleagues proposed a path toward a solution:
Black holes might have «soft hair,» low - energy particles that would retain information
about what fell inside (SN: 2/06/16, p. 16).
The intriguing question, which no one can yet answer, is just
what would that tell the observer
about the
black hole?
This is intriguing, but, as long as the
black hole continues to exist, we do not need to worry
about what might have happened to the information, or entropy, associated with the original star.
Neither clue is definitive, and theorists» models don't give clear guidance
about what observers should look for next to confirm that direct collapse
black holes exist.
What gravitational waves from
black holes say
about supernova physics.
The amplitude and frequency of these waves could reveal the initial mass of the seeds from which the first
black holes grew since they were formed 13 billion years ago and provide further clues
about what caused them and where they formed, the researchers said.
Until we have a theory that effectively integrates quantum mechanics and gravity, theoretical physicists are likely to remain almost as puzzled as everyone else
about what goes on at the heart of a
black hole — although that hasn't stopped them from trying to work it out.
Stanford is now relying on SYK to learn more
about a
black hole's interior, while Kitaev is pursuing the question of
what happens to the information carried by objects that fall into a
black hole.
«For instance, a paper talking
about protein - folding patterns is a great example of the practice of making models to understand phenomena, while preliminary results from a study of
black holes might be a great way to ask students to examine
what the next steps would be for the researchers, allowing them to develop hypotheses and design possible experiments,» Lake said.
Carroll agrees, but hopes their work «starts us thinking in slightly different ways
about what it would mean to get qubits out [of a
black hole]», and thus solve the puzzle
about what happens to the information that falls into a
black hole.
The detector's latest discovery means we are now firmly in a new era of astronomy — it matches up convincingly with
what we already know
about black holes
According to relativity theory, information
about what falls into a
black hole is forever lost.
«This chicken - and - egg problem of
what was there first, the galaxy or the
black hole, has been pushed all the way to the edge of the universe,» Yale University astrophysicist Kevin Schawinski said in a June 15 press conference at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. Schawinski was part of a team of researchers that used two renowned orbiting observatories, the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-Ray Observatory, to identify a population of
black holes in galaxies at redshift 6, which corresponds to a time
about 950 million years after the big bang.
Theorists now concur that massive stars must spew fantastic jets of energy into space when their cores collapse into
black holes, but they disagree
about what those jets look like.
We know more
about what it isn't: it can't be dead stars, rogue planets, or wandering
black holes, for example.
That is of interest because there are competing theories
about what would happen to such
black holes.
Originally, he argued that this «Hawking radiation» is so random that it could carry no information out
about what had fallen into the
black hole.
Perhaps
what's different
about them, McDonald says, is that the cooling of gas flowing into the center is slowed down by the heating effect of a
black hole spewing out material from the center of the cluster.
Data from these waves will test Einstein's predictions
about how fast
black holes spin and exactly
what happens when they smash into neutron stars and into each other.
Joseph Polchinski, Firewall Institution: University of California, Santa Barbara Year: 2012 Known for: Discovering D - branes, explaining
what D - branes are (a string theory thing) Idea: Once a
black hole has lost
about half of itself to Hawking radiation, the event horizon can no longer store enough encoded information to tell the story of
what's inside.
«Based on
what we know
about star formation in galaxies of different types, we can infer when and how many
black holes formed in each galaxy,» Elbert said.
«Observations with the next generation of radio telescopes will tell us more
about what actually happens when a star is eaten by a
black hole — and how powerful jets form and evolve right next to
black holes,» explains Stefanie Komossa, astronomer at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn, Germany.
The unsolved key question
about these objects asks:
what is the mass of the
black hole in these bright objects?
Although the flare provided crucial information
about the Milky Way's
black hole, scientists are still unsure
what caused it.
«
What we haven't discovered is how you can go
about making such an enormously supermassive
black hole in the Universe's first generation of galaxies,» he says.
But this conflicted with the laws of quantum physics, which state that information
about what fell into the
black hole can never be completely wiped out.
Instant Expert 1: General relativity From the expanding universe to
black holes and quantum gravity, here's
what you need to know
about Einstein's masterwork
«If you jump into a
black hole, your mass energy will be returned to our Universe, but in a mangled form, which contains information
about what you were like, but in an unrecognisable state.»
The lost difference,
about three Suns» worth, was dispersed as gravitational radiation — much of it during
what physicists call the «ringdown» phase, when the merged
black hole was settling into a spherical shape.
They've already identified four other explosions they think are in the same category, and they write that better understanding of
what's occurring in this class of objects could change
what we know
about how
black holes affect the world around them.
What remains is its
black hole and a small galactic remnant only
about 3,000 light - years across.
Throw another
black hole in to the mix, and
what you get is utter chaos, one that is sure to bring
about the utter annihilation of whatever happens to be in the vicinity.
Black holes, dark matter, quasars and quarks —
what's not cosmically cool
about these free astronomy lectures?
The orbiting telescope on the Russian RadioAstron mission combined Read more
about Getting closer than ever before to
what a
black hole spits out - Scimex
What is so fascinating
about the primordial
black hole theory of Garcia - Bellido and Clesse is that it will be tested with current and future instruments.
The paper outlines how interactions between particles emitted by a
black hole can reveal information
about what lies within, such as characteristics of the object that formed the
black hole to begin with, and characteristics of the matter and energy drawn inside.
That fits with
what scientists know
about black holes, which take in gas and release energy, blowing away gas that would otherwise end up forming stars.
Hawking further concluded that the particles emitted by a
black hole would provide no clues
about what lay inside, meaning that any information held within a
black hole would be completely lost once the entity evaporated.
«Supermassive
black holes have a lot of influence on the stars around them and the growth and evolution of the galaxy, so understanding more
about them and
what happens when they merge with one another could be important for our understanding for the universe,» Taylor said.
We have thought an awful lot
about what black holes do.
TKF: Is the reality of
what we're learning
about black holes stranger than any movie or fictional account?