Sentences with phrase «what about black holes»

Not exact matches

So they're kind of the same in some deep mathematical sense, and as of today we don't really know what happens at the center of a black hole and we don't really know what happened at the moment of the big bang so these are two puzzles that are cousins of one another and anything that we learn about one is certainly going to shed light on the other.»
We cant even see whats on the other side of the Moon, and we are led to believe about a black hole Billions of light years away based on a telescope?
It's so easy to slip into that black hole of self - hate, but when you hear from others, it gives you a little bit more strength and more courage to stop fretting about what's on the other end of the fork.
At the launch in the City of London, Mr Clegg accused the other parties of «kidding people» about what he called the «big black hole in the public finances».
As Britain's energy black hole grows larger, has anyone in government got a grip on what we're doing about it?
If this Conservative government cared about Britain and what makes our country great, they would not be running headlong towards a hard Brexit that will blow a # 220 billion black hole in the budget.
The project continues to detect waves from similar events, offering new and incredible details about what happens when these black holes crash and warp the spacetime around them.
This week, Stephen Hawking, the most famous living scientist, changed his mind about what black holes are.
The idea of matter escaping the alleged point - of - no - return was surprising (it's a central plot point in that other recent movie about black holes, the biographical The Theory of Everything), but the fate of information that falls into the black hole was what really troubled Hawking's colleagues.
In 2016, Hawking and colleagues proposed a path toward a solution: Black holes might have «soft hair,» low - energy particles that would retain information about what fell inside (SN: 2/06/16, p. 16).
The intriguing question, which no one can yet answer, is just what would that tell the observer about the black hole?
This is intriguing, but, as long as the black hole continues to exist, we do not need to worry about what might have happened to the information, or entropy, associated with the original star.
Neither clue is definitive, and theorists» models don't give clear guidance about what observers should look for next to confirm that direct collapse black holes exist.
What gravitational waves from black holes say about supernova physics.
The amplitude and frequency of these waves could reveal the initial mass of the seeds from which the first black holes grew since they were formed 13 billion years ago and provide further clues about what caused them and where they formed, the researchers said.
Until we have a theory that effectively integrates quantum mechanics and gravity, theoretical physicists are likely to remain almost as puzzled as everyone else about what goes on at the heart of a black hole — although that hasn't stopped them from trying to work it out.
Stanford is now relying on SYK to learn more about a black hole's interior, while Kitaev is pursuing the question of what happens to the information carried by objects that fall into a black hole.
«For instance, a paper talking about protein - folding patterns is a great example of the practice of making models to understand phenomena, while preliminary results from a study of black holes might be a great way to ask students to examine what the next steps would be for the researchers, allowing them to develop hypotheses and design possible experiments,» Lake said.
Carroll agrees, but hopes their work «starts us thinking in slightly different ways about what it would mean to get qubits out [of a black hole]», and thus solve the puzzle about what happens to the information that falls into a black hole.
The detector's latest discovery means we are now firmly in a new era of astronomy — it matches up convincingly with what we already know about black holes
According to relativity theory, information about what falls into a black hole is forever lost.
«This chicken - and - egg problem of what was there first, the galaxy or the black hole, has been pushed all the way to the edge of the universe,» Yale University astrophysicist Kevin Schawinski said in a June 15 press conference at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. Schawinski was part of a team of researchers that used two renowned orbiting observatories, the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-Ray Observatory, to identify a population of black holes in galaxies at redshift 6, which corresponds to a time about 950 million years after the big bang.
Theorists now concur that massive stars must spew fantastic jets of energy into space when their cores collapse into black holes, but they disagree about what those jets look like.
We know more about what it isn't: it can't be dead stars, rogue planets, or wandering black holes, for example.
That is of interest because there are competing theories about what would happen to such black holes.
Originally, he argued that this «Hawking radiation» is so random that it could carry no information out about what had fallen into the black hole.
Perhaps what's different about them, McDonald says, is that the cooling of gas flowing into the center is slowed down by the heating effect of a black hole spewing out material from the center of the cluster.
Data from these waves will test Einstein's predictions about how fast black holes spin and exactly what happens when they smash into neutron stars and into each other.
Joseph Polchinski, Firewall Institution: University of California, Santa Barbara Year: 2012 Known for: Discovering D - branes, explaining what D - branes are (a string theory thing) Idea: Once a black hole has lost about half of itself to Hawking radiation, the event horizon can no longer store enough encoded information to tell the story of what's inside.
«Based on what we know about star formation in galaxies of different types, we can infer when and how many black holes formed in each galaxy,» Elbert said.
«Observations with the next generation of radio telescopes will tell us more about what actually happens when a star is eaten by a black hole — and how powerful jets form and evolve right next to black holes,» explains Stefanie Komossa, astronomer at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn, Germany.
The unsolved key question about these objects asks: what is the mass of the black hole in these bright objects?
Although the flare provided crucial information about the Milky Way's black hole, scientists are still unsure what caused it.
«What we haven't discovered is how you can go about making such an enormously supermassive black hole in the Universe's first generation of galaxies,» he says.
But this conflicted with the laws of quantum physics, which state that information about what fell into the black hole can never be completely wiped out.
Instant Expert 1: General relativity From the expanding universe to black holes and quantum gravity, here's what you need to know about Einstein's masterwork
«If you jump into a black hole, your mass energy will be returned to our Universe, but in a mangled form, which contains information about what you were like, but in an unrecognisable state.»
The lost difference, about three Suns» worth, was dispersed as gravitational radiation — much of it during what physicists call the «ringdown» phase, when the merged black hole was settling into a spherical shape.
They've already identified four other explosions they think are in the same category, and they write that better understanding of what's occurring in this class of objects could change what we know about how black holes affect the world around them.
What remains is its black hole and a small galactic remnant only about 3,000 light - years across.
Throw another black hole in to the mix, and what you get is utter chaos, one that is sure to bring about the utter annihilation of whatever happens to be in the vicinity.
Black holes, dark matter, quasars and quarks — what's not cosmically cool about these free astronomy lectures?
The orbiting telescope on the Russian RadioAstron mission combined Read more about Getting closer than ever before to what a black hole spits out - Scimex
What is so fascinating about the primordial black hole theory of Garcia - Bellido and Clesse is that it will be tested with current and future instruments.
The paper outlines how interactions between particles emitted by a black hole can reveal information about what lies within, such as characteristics of the object that formed the black hole to begin with, and characteristics of the matter and energy drawn inside.
That fits with what scientists know about black holes, which take in gas and release energy, blowing away gas that would otherwise end up forming stars.
Hawking further concluded that the particles emitted by a black hole would provide no clues about what lay inside, meaning that any information held within a black hole would be completely lost once the entity evaporated.
«Supermassive black holes have a lot of influence on the stars around them and the growth and evolution of the galaxy, so understanding more about them and what happens when they merge with one another could be important for our understanding for the universe,» Taylor said.
We have thought an awful lot about what black holes do.
TKF: Is the reality of what we're learning about black holes stranger than any movie or fictional account?
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z