So
what about consent forms?
Not exact matches
Such
consent may be obtained only after research subjects are fully informed
about the goals of the research, as well as
about what sorts of privacy protections they can expect.
But it's not at all clear that consumers understand exactly
what kinds of information Facebook has
about them,
what can be done with it, or who would have
consented to that data collection.
In the European Union another twist to this story is that Facebook's data transfers between WhatsApp and Facebook for ads / product purposes were quickly suspended — the CNIL confirms in its notice that Facebook told it the data of its 10M French users have never been processed for targeted advertising purposes — after local regulators intervened, and objected publicly that Facebook had not provided users with enough information
about what it planned to do with their data, nor secured «valid
consent» to share their information.
«To the extent that the EU has barreled forward with
consent being the key, in this environment when we can't really know
what's being collected
about us all the time and
what's being used, putting the onus on a person to use judgment to allow or disallow something could be problematic,» she said.
Johnson also warned attendees
about what is happening in Europe, stating that in Netherlands the age of
consent is 12 and in Belgium there is no age of
consent for assisted suicide.
And given
what we had learned after World War II
about abuses in research medicine, experimental subjects should be used only if they were capable of giving, and actually did give, a free and informed
consent to their participation.
No — its
about doing
what is right and allowing tax - paying, patriot citizens to serve their country regardless of
what consenting adult they choose as a partner.
Without
consent, there's no practical yardstick for
what is right or wrong, so all we have left is a set of tangled - up beliefs
about women being sex objects who are wholly responsible for
what happens to them.
And I'm pretty sure you're a real freak if you are THAT worried
about what other
consenting adults do in their bedrooms.
Rather, we want the law to help educate people
about what is contrary to the natural law, and it is a happy fact that a majority
consent to this.
For starters, he seems to be more concerned
about what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes.
Rape culture pushes the victim - blaming mentality: the idea that if * she * had done something differently — worn a different outfit (even though women get raped when dressed modestly; rapists don't care
about what a person is wearing), didn't get drunk (opens a person up to anything, never mind that it is impossible for a person to give clear
consent when they're intoxicated / inebriated), used the «buddy system» (
what if she wanted to go out by herself?
Why is God so concerned
about watching
what 2
consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom when tragedies are going on constantly?
But where in the church today is anybody, with his own
consent, ever really examined
about what he has learned?
When I speak out, I'm called a wingnut, a prude, and worse and if anyone knows me, I don't give a rip
what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms (emphasis on the word «private» — I'm talking her
about public personas).
Correction:
what two
consenting adults do in private is between them, god, the easter bunny, santa claus, the tooth fairy, big foot, ra, shiva, allah, the flying spaghetti monster, the invisible pink unicorn, thor, zeus, apollo, hercules, hermes, athena and
about 1800 other made up characters.
In
what way does
what two
consenting adults do in their bedroom effect you??? Think
about what you are doing... You are trying to imposing your belief on other people... trying to run their lives.
Unethical or religious freedom???
What about the LDS practice of Proxy Baptism — baptizing deceased persons of other religions into the LDS faith without the written
consent of the family members of the deceased (proxy LDS baptisms have been performed on past Catholic Popes and other top religious figures).
What two
consenting people do behind closed doors is their business, but I don't want to know
about it.
A spokesman said «It was a kind of sex education lesson but by untrained inspectors without the
consent of parents or the school,» In a sane world this would be an entirely reasonably response: in
what other situation could a complete stranger approach a group of young children and ask them
about same sex attraction?
They're out there playing a risky sport, and other ones are having those conversations with their wives or are even talking
about walking away from the game... I think at that level, you want players to have informed
consent, and you want them to know
what the right choice is to make.»
Also, you were saying informed
consent requires enumeration and since the midwives have no idea
what they are talking
about, they can't possibly enumerate.
Someone commented on Dr. Amy's other Ina thread that
what Ina was writing
about is A-OK as long as the mother
consents.
I've always wondered, if a baby or child is in hospital and the parents for some reason are not around,
what happens
about consent for medical care that the kid needs?
As well as educating us
about what a routine pregnancy and birth looks like, proper nutrition, informed
consent, breastfeeding, and relaxation exercises, we went over routine interventions and possible complications.
Considering
what we know
about placental transfusion immediately after birth, and the importance of adequate blood volume for newborns, it would be unethical to randomly allocate newborns to have premature clamping of their cords (and many mother's would refuse
consent).
All of these cases are carried out with parental
consent, so we are working in partnership with the parents to find out as much as we can
about why the baby died, or
what the syndrome was, and any information we find will help the family for the future, both in dealing with grief and also for future pregnancies and accurate risk counselling.
Ms Denham has said she was looking at whether personal data was acquired in «an unauthorised way», whether there was sufficient
consent to share the data,
what was done to safeguard it and whether Facebook acted robustly when they found out
about the loss of the data.
What about the situation where indebtedness can not feasibly be escaped, even if you yourself aren't in debt when reaching the age of
consent
What about the Havasupai Indians, who claimed the DNA they provided for diabetes research was used for other studies without their
consent?
The same goes for expectations
about who owns or controls ideas, data, and writings;
what constitutes conflict of interest and informed
consent;
what responsibilities individuals have if they observe wrongdoing; and other complex issues that arise in scientific research.
Both postural and phasic muscles are skeletal muscle, which is categorized as voluntary muscle: voluntary, as opposed to the smooth muscle your organs are made of, which is involuntary — meaning your organs continue to do their job without your conscious control or
consent (even, for example, when you're not thinking
about what your small intestine is doing).
Informed
consent implies that we research and relay
what we can, as clinicians,
about the risks, known and unknown, of a given intervention, in the context of the purported benefits, and potential alternatives.
It made me realize why
consent cards are really
about respecting other people's boundaries, regardless of «
what you were taught.»
The event sparked a conversation
about what constitutes a sex crime and why getting to see a naked photo of someone without their
consent is a violation — things that seem easy to understand but also had to be discussed at length, as with all matters involving online privacy.
Schrader is contractually barred from discussing
what happened, maybe because he's been blisteringly vocal
about past instances in which his films were re-edited or reshot without his
consent.
What's finally wrong with 27 Dresses is that it has no ambition to be
about anything, which is fine until this deal - breaking moment, at which point one catalogs one's
consent to find the entire exercise wanting.
This regulations set rules for how and when we can collect personal data from users on our website, so is now required by law to be transparent
about the persona data we collect, also be relevant and limited to
what is necessary for the intended purpose of collection, but, specially, gain
consent from individuals before using it.
Since the sex bureaucracy's role is regulating health and safety, explanations of
consent easily lead to instruction
about what is «healthy» or «positive» in sex and relationships.
The more investment that is made in this domain of education, the better - equipped young people will be to navigate their way sexually, or not, to manage risk so its limited, to increase awareness
about matters of choice and
consent and to increase enjoyment and satisfaction of
what is for many people, an important part of adult life.
These include providing notice of any data collection activities and requiring parental
consent and information
about the type of student data being collected and for
what purpose prior to any release of data.
First things first: Even if your uptight neighbor is overtly harassing you
about the perceived noise problem, do not attempt to record
what they're doing — to all appearances, recording in California is never legal unless all parties
consent to it.
What I found the most interesting was the bit
about him not being able to answer fan questions without Nintendo's
consent.
Whatever your motive for participating in
what can only be considered a campaign of climate engineering cover - up, rest assured that we, at GeoengineeringWatch.org, will do our best to publicly expose you (and all those like you who are participating in the climate engineering cover - up) to populations that deserve to know the truth
about the ongoing highly destructive and dangerous geoengineering programs that were long ago deployed without public knowledge or
consent.
6) Harm: Respect: Further concerns are the authors and UWA have caused me harm, have failed to treat me with respect, not sort or obtained my
consent and have not been able to show any justification for deceiving in my questions Prof Lewandowsky
about LOG12 and by concealing from there research and following this particular named human participant whose comments (
what else) have been collected
Whether the victim chose to go to the home of the attacker, or if they previously
consented to or engaged in sexual activity, it does not say anything
about what happened in the moment the assault took place.
Before we talk
about YLaw's secret in changing a spousal support
consent Order 5 years after it was made, let's look at
what is involved in changing a
consent Order,
what you can do to apply for it and how to do it:
The issue in this case was
what about a situation in which the woman previously
consented?
If the accused lies to the person they assault
about what the real activity is that the person is
consenting to.