Sentences with phrase «what about dialogue»

But what about dialogue out in the open world?

Not exact matches

You want to engage in some kind of active dialogue with yourself about what is my overarching goal, what do I really want to get done this week, and how do I remind myself of that.
«We dialogue about what businesses aren't going to be here in the next four or five years, and are we a part of that?
The point for me was never to tell my student that things were «fcuked», but to provide the framework and information to form their own perspectives and ideas on what they were learning and to form a dialogue about the issues.
If we connect with people about what we have in common — sports teams, TV shows, interests — it is easier to have dialogue about what we disagree on.
The candidate from her party running in Buenos Aires — the country's biggest province — has demurred when asked about the situation in the Venezuela, saying that he did not know «in detail» what was going on there, later stressing the differences between the tenures of Chavez and Maduro and calling for dialogue with a third party, such as the Pope.
«We partnered with HP to hear about the dialogue happening within NASCAR, what's the tenor of what's being said,» Phelps said.
So the activist's lobbying activities have to be limited: He can make public pronouncements about what changes he wants at Hertz, but an actual dialogue with other shareholders is dangerous.
Some advocate goals that do not align with what the American business community wants or what China is prepared to offer, raising questions about how productive a dialogue will be, and whether talks can prevent the world's two largest economies from tipping into a deeper conflict.
The 10 commandments came straight from GOD to Moses and is a dialogue from GOD to us about what morals to be used in society — idiot.
But when we are having a dialogue about this stuff, tell me how can I get my point of view across, like, I believe that being gay is a choice, and then use what many, many others use to defend their so - called choice, little girls.
I will dialogue with you about this, no one else, cause what we talk about will get lost, and it will turn to a mud fight with others.
Before we can talk to others about our faith, before we can dialogue about what is theologically «right or wrong» with someone else, we must first understand how our beliefs about God have been informed by these four areas.
But isn't this what «flat structure» and «communal dialogue and discernment» and a «culture of participation» were supposed to be all about in the first place?
«So it gave us an opportunity to talk about their conviction and why they don't eat pork and what that means, and it really opened up some great opportunities of dialogue and conversation — just really over cuisine — all of us sitting down and talking about what our beliefs are.»
You will find that we may be able to have some real dialogue based on true facts about what's really going on.
All religions including Christianity, all cultures and all secular ideologies are in informal and formal dialogues about what is the meaning of our common humanity and about the path of common action - responses to the situation from their respective understanding of the nature and destiny of the human selfhood.
After seeing the news it aroused intense dialogue between me and my roommate (she is not Christian) about what this means for Christianity.
What's hard, is trying to push through this and find a way to dialogue which is what I think NP is getting at... and what I have been learning a lot about lately, partly thanks to this blog: — RRWhat's hard, is trying to push through this and find a way to dialogue which is what I think NP is getting at... and what I have been learning a lot about lately, partly thanks to this blog: — RRwhat I think NP is getting at... and what I have been learning a lot about lately, partly thanks to this blog: — RRwhat I have been learning a lot about lately, partly thanks to this blog: — RRB -.
No, what American Catholics are happy about, or should be, is that the pope is bringing Christianity into the dialogue with secularism in a way that doesn't alienate the people he would like to introduce to Christ via grace and mercy AND that he is doing so while maintaining the firm teachings the Church holds on moral matters.
Lately I've been interested in what sort of difference could be made if «dialogue» became less focused on understanding why someone believes what they do (in light of the way I belief) and more about understanding the way those beliefs are held in the context of the experiences that helped birth them.
On the other hand, if they think prayer is a dialogue with God, they're often not sure what it means to have God respond - and they are uneasy with people who speak confidently about what God has revealed to them.
For this dialogue to be real, one must not only mean the other, but also bring oneself, and that means say at times what one really thinks about the matter in question.
There is nothing more holy» or terrifying» than reading what St. Catherine of Siena wrote about wayward clergy in her searing Dialogue; few sermons in Christendom equal the power of St. Alphonsus Liguori's on the enticements of the world; and how many of us would have the courage of a St. Charles Borromeo, who, as he implemented the reforms of the Council of Trent, had his life threatened multiple times?
But it opens up the dialogue more if we are clear about the fact that that is what we are doing.
Cf. what Henri Nouwen says about the preacher needing to have a capacity for dialogue and to be personally available, Creative Ministry (New York: Doubleday, 1971), 33 - 39.
«We like having dialogues about spirituality, but we get distracted by conversations of Sharia, of jihad, of apostasy and the conversation becomes more about this is what Islam is not, as opposed to a proactive conversation about real Islam.»
What roles should Christian churches now play in the dialogue about democratic participation, discursive civility, and moral responsibility now emerging in diverse political cultures across the globe?
But what about my generation, the generation of American liberal Jews who feel increasingly alienated from old - world Orthodoxy and increasingly wooed by Christian denominations that are publishing position papers that redefine Christian attitudes toward Jews and invite us to dialogue?
Lear marvels that so much of what passes for commentary on Socratic irony in Plato's dialogues has to do exclusively with the question of whether Socrates dissembles, whether he wears a mask of unknowing behind which lurks either certainty about important matters or skepticism, perhaps even nihilism.
But it would also, he suggests, give us some sense of what any reasonable person would say about the historical Jesus and thus might provide «a starting point for dialogue between Christians and Jews, between various Christian confessions, and between believers and nonbelievers.»
We trust in what Christ has done for us, and we can enter openly into dialogue with non-Christians about what has transformed their lives.
There's nothing like a long road trip to fuel internal dialogue about who you are, what you're doing and what you're doing it all for.
On the basis of this position, it becomes possible to come into dialogue with other positions, not just to learn what these disciplines tell us about the inauthenticity of the world, but also to learn a word of «revelation,» that is, a word of truth about God.
I suggest this preacher visit this blog and begin a dialogue of what Christians believe they know about Atheists.
What we truly crave, however, is an I» - Thou» relationship, which can only come about through open dialogue.
So, we can discuss our religious differences (those many gulfs that separate us), understanding that it is largely a waste of time (depending on what our motivation is) and just enjoy the dialogue, or we can talk about wine, movies, etc..
What can we do about the barriers to proper dialogue?
They are seeking what has been called post-modern paradigms for «an open secular democratic culture» within the framework of a public philosophy (Walter Lippman) or Civil Religion (Robert Bellah) or a new genuine realistic humanism or at least a body of insights about the nature of being and becoming human, evolved through dialogue among renascent religions, secularist ideologies including the philosophies of the tragic dimension of existence and disciplines of social and human sciences which have opened themselves to each other in the context of their common sense of historical responsibility and common human destiny.
Benedict has expressed regret about the violent Muslim reaction to what he said; he has continued to meet with Muslim leaders; he has reaffirmed the Church's continuing dialogue with Islam — but there is no chance whatsoever that he will retract or retreat from the argument he has made.
In regard to the comment about how Herd Evans provides little guidance in this critique, I would encourage readers not to seek step - by - step guidelines for what to do next but to exegete the situation on their own by engaging the tension through ongoing dialogue with millennials (or anyone who has become jaded with church).
Also, it is clear that, theories and world views apart, the modern situation continues to pose ethical problems of great gravity — but that is not quite the same as what the dialogue with «modern man» was to be about.
What I am seeking in this paper is a way of thinking about the situation appropriate for those who are committed to dialogue.
I use «ideas» loosely, because it's mostly a sleepy, intentionally goofy dialogue that consists of «what about...» followed by a long pause and things like ``... homemade hot pockets!»
In our ongoing dialogue about motivation, how do you motivate your kid to want to do what it takes to achieve their goals?
I think some people on flights think I am indulging in performance art and wanting to start a dialogue about knitting or what I'm doing.
PfG aims to start a dialogue about what it means to participate responsibly in our digital world and, while recognizing the potential risks, celebrates technology as a vehicle for opportunity and social change.
While none of the parents thanked me, I hoped that my actions opened a dialogue between the children and their parents about what had happened.
It's also important to listen to them with an open heart and open mind, so you can dialogue about what matters most.
Sponsored by the National Dairy Council, these sessions were dedicated to discussion of the USDA - proposed meal pattern changes, and organized to encourage a dialogue among school nutrition professionals about what the changes would mean from a practical, implementation standpoint in their school cafeterias.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z