Sentences with phrase «what about employers»

Moreover, what about the employers that are taking advantage of the masses by paying the lowest wage possible?
And what about employers taking a risk for change?
But what about the employers?
What about employers who had to reimburse winning claimants for the fees they were unlawfully required to pay?
What about employers who have deeply held beliefs against other medical treatments: anti-depressants, antibiotics, and don't forget the anti-vaccination people.
But what about the employer?

Not exact matches

This one statistic alone should make all employers more interested in boosting bliss: Truly cheerful employees spend about 80 % of their time at work doing what they're there to do; the least content spend only 40 % of their time on job - related activities, according to a survey by workplace happiness consultant and author Jessica Pryce - Jones.
Through the data it collects in a growing number of companies, Moss and his team hope to eventually put numbers to the value of just about any office practice or perk, enabling employers to instantly answer questions like, What would make my staff happier — free food at work or a shorter commute?
«Recruiters, employers, and prospective clients will all run searches for your name, so you'll want to find out what the internet says about you.
These latest reports and in particular the Productivity commission are nonsence to say that it will have a marked effect on the overseas On - Line sales is absolute rubbish.My daughter is in retail in Sydney the problem with overseas On - Line they pay no tax eg GST super, the list goes on we forget WA metro has say 1.8 m people Sydney has 6m Bondi Junction which is probiably the largest shopping centre in Sydney is shut at 6 o, clock most nights The gov keeps going on about the east and what they do Wayne Spencer and co are mouth peaces for the large retailers.My main concern is the On - Lne which is destroying Australias retail ecnomy if it fails being our largest employer the country will be in huge trouble economicly.I have spelt this out in detail in an Email to Bill Shorten if you would like a copy
But what about the millions of Americans whose employers don't offer a 401 (k)?
Like TaxAct, TurboTax noticed that the Social Security and Medicare taxes reported on my W - 2 were too high, but TurboTax took the extra step of telling me that I was entitled to a refund from my employer — and then told me what to do about it (ask my employer for a refund and a new W - 2, and then file my tax return).
RELATED: What you need to know about morality clauses when hiring — or firing — an employee» Ray Rice case shows how difficult it is for employers to deal with off - hours misconduct»
That shift — from employer to consumer responsibility — is exactly what's about to happen to insurance.
Many state labor departments also have listings on their websites for employers about laws they must abide by when doing business in the state and these can be helpful in determining what to include in an employee handbook.
Create a spreadsheet to help you keep track of the hiring managers you've reached out to, so that when you hear back from them, you know who's who and you can easily recall what the job was and anything else you've learned about the employer from your research.
It isn't because there aren't people without jobs out there, but rather because many of those people, either from birth or from discouragement of being without work, are not thinking about the bigger picture, «making the employer happy» as much as they are following what they are told «fill in that sheet of numbers.»
If he continues to pay his SpaceX interns only half of what Facebook does — about $ 4,000 a month as compared to the $ 8,000 a month Zuckerberg's most junior employees make, according to the anonymous employer ranking site Glassdoor — he could lose talented prospects to companies in Silicon Valley.
Find out how they treated the receptionist, find out what they did while they waited, ask about any chance encounters with other employers... occasionally you can identify a disconnect between what they show you and what they show the people they're not trying to impress.
If you've ever spent hours filling out online job applications, only to never hear a word back from the employer, you know what I'm talking about.
Making the time to ask people what they think about something, or how to do it, goes a long way towards building that bond between employees and employers that helps everyone get through the inevitable ups and downs of working together.
To encourage employees to be enthusiastic about the future of the business, the employer must give the workforce what it needs to make meaningful contributions to the company.
Q — What are some of the biggest concerns that potential employers might voice about hiring a virtual assistant.
About a third of employers say they are getting the workers they need, in part because they are engaged in the training process, communicating directly with schools and students to develop course work or to the let institutions know what skills new hires need.
«Guess what's going to happen in January and February, after all their employees go on Facebook and talk about what a great employer they are?»
«What we thought and we had envisioned is the cost of the newly enrolled would end up approaching that of the [employer - insured] group market, but we're seeing in the data we have today it is actually about 20 percent higher than in the group market,» said Alissa Fox, senior vice president for policy and representation at BCBSA, in an interview with Morning Consult.
The following statistic alone should make all employers more interested in boosting bliss: Truly cheerful employees spend about 80 % of their time at work doing what they're there to do (even happy people need an Instagram break); the least content spend only 40 % of their day on job - related activities, according to a survey by workplace happiness consultant and author Jessica Pryce - Jones.
It's just that having lots to brag about on Facebook — about what their workplace looks like or offers — won't likely tip the scales in an employer's favor if the fundamental wants of millennials aren't met.
You just talked about how reluctant some of these negotiators are, but in health policy consistently what you hear people say, and it's Lucy and the football every time, the reason employers ultimately... They may not want to be in the market, just like they may not want to pay high costs, but what they really don't want to do is piss off their employees.
The second was terrified about what his parents and future employer might think — he had just secured a job at a leading Wall Street firm.
So what is it about so called «labour disputes» (why are they never called «employer disputes?»)
Learn more about what makes FlexJobs Featured Employers so great.
Here is what employers need to know about wages, benefits, retirement plans and taxes.
That's what you call a code of ETHICS??? So your employer does something terrible and you have to keep quiet about it even if it's in the public interest to know, and you consider it ethical to stay silent?
^ New Primer on Alcoholism by Marty Mann, in a chapter on «What to Do About an Alcoholic,» has sections entitled «If You Are the Wife of an Alcoholic» (206 - 13), «If You Are the Husband of an Alcoholic» (213 - 17), «If You Are the Son or Daughter» (217 - 19), «If You Are a Friend» (219 - 21), and «If You Are the Employer» (221 - 24).
It's not about telling the church what to do — it's about implementing rules and regulations for ALL employers.
Please enlighten me as to the 16 you are talking about - And more importantly how is it any of the employer's business what prescriptions a doctor writes for a female patient?
Click here to learn about Harden's favorite Chicago restaurant, what he'd eat for his last meal and how he really feels about the Bloomin» Onion, served at his onetime employer, Outback Steakhouse.
This is what his employer decided to pay, do you hear anyone else moaning about your salary (should you have one)?
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
This interview seems to only raise more questions than answers, not just about where he wants to play, but about what he wants from his future employer.
«We're hoping to educate parents, coaches, school administrators, employers, athletic trainers and other health care professionals and those who exercise or work in the cold about what can be done to prevent these types of serious injuries.»
What would your employer think about your social media account?
Break Time Who is covered by the law What are the laws in your state How to talk to your employer about pumping or nursing breaks What are the space requirements What can you do if your employer refuses to comply FAQ ’s
When it comes to what working parents want from their employers, it's not always about the money.
Ask about someone bringing you your baby so you can breastfeed, and be sure to let your employer what you need so they can help you figure out the best course of action.
But O'Malley suggests always talking to your employer about what you need.
What made Foshee's talk so remarkable was its content — he spoke in great detail about BPI's ammoniated beef process — but also his bravery at confronting his former employers, who just happened to be in the room.
It's more than just an employer - employee relationship, it's a chance for young workers to learn about what's expected every day from seasoned employees,» said Department of Social Services Commissioner Marie Cannon.
Cuomo, meanwhile, released a bill that would ban employers from asking about a job applicant's prior salary amount, to try to correct what the governor says is a «persistent gender wage gap» in New York and the nation.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z