Sentences with phrase «what about fuel economy»

Turning the morning commute into a race is fun, but what about fuel economy?

What about fuel economy?

Not exact matches

Although BMW claims the extender roughly doubles the range of the i3, which would put its total range at about 200 miles, we don't yet know what fuel economy the i3 will get when the gasoline engine is running, nor the official EPA ratings for mpg - e and estimated range.

It's a logical strategy for the 2015 Porsche Cayenne S E-Hybrid, since fuel economy is crucial for the future of the SUV, no matter what you might think about the declining price of a gallon of gas.

Offering amazing engine power and impressive fuel economy, the Mercedes - Benz CLA is ready to change your ideas about what a luxury sedan is supposed to be.

What really shocked me about the base Stealth is the fuel economy it delivers.

The 2014 Chevrolet Cruze Diesel is touted for its amazing fuel economy, but what isn't talked about so much are its performance numbers.

You know you aren't getting a horsepower beast with the Fit, that's not what getting great fuel economy is about.

Fuel economy, though, is about what one would expect for a big vehicle such as this: 13 miles per gallon in the city and 18 mpg on the highway for the all - wheel - drive model.

When the new QX50 goes on sale, the combined fuel economy should be around 26 mpg, about what a diesel - powered vehicle of the same size would achieve, but without a lot of the emissions - system complexity.

Fuel economy is about what you'd expect, because although it's officially rated at 13 mpg city and 14 mpg highway, we consistently returned between 10 and 11 mpg combined.

Fuel economy has been good, about 18 - 19 mpg during drive to work and with bikes and cargo carrier attached, about 20 on long trips without extra stuff (not sure what other people expect from a 4400 lb SUV, better than I ever got with my Jeep).

Here is what I have to say about these certain topics: Fuel Economy: It has the same fuel economy of a Honda Civic that has several holes in the fuel lFuel Economy: It has the same fuel economy of a Honda Civic that has several holes in the fueEconomy: It has the same fuel economy of a Honda Civic that has several holes in the fuel lfuel economy of a Honda Civic that has several holes in the fueeconomy of a Honda Civic that has several holes in the fuel lfuel line.

But at this price, with estimated fuel economy numbers at 32 city and 35 highway (we registered about 28.5 mpg in our hard, mostly city driving), six airbags for safety, and a 10 - year, 100,000 - mile powertrain warranty, what's not to love?

There's no official word yet about the BMW Vision EfficientDynamics Concept (or its powertrain technology) ever reaching production, but if this car is the face of the future — in which excellent driving dynamics are complemented by exceptional fuel economy — we really like what we see.

What particularly amazed us about the 135i was its fuel economy.

By all means it does what it is intended to, get great fuel economy, but that is about it.

The best EPA - estimated fuel economy for the TLX is 23 MPG city and 33 MPG highway in the base 2.4 - liter trim, and that's about what we saw on our day - long test drive.

We are not clear what is «Eco» about this Tucson trim since its fuel economy is not better than the that of the drivetrain in the top - selling Forester and CR - V models now heading in to their second model years.

What I find ironic is that it is his can - do optimism that is in this case working against our ability to do something about our dependence on fossil fuels and the climate change that this dependence is resulting in, that is, switching to alternate energy, preserving modern civilization and the world economy beyond Peak Oil and Peak Coal, preventing climate change from becoming such a huge problem that it destroys that the world economy — and more than likely leads to a series of highly destructive wars over limited resources.

What that sciencey - sounding gibberish about «unproved variables» means is that you don't want to see trillions of dollars in wealth shift from the fossil fuel corporations to other sectors of the industrial economy, therefore, anthropogenic global warming can not be true.

So what if they were more fuel efficient and kept the fleet fuel economy average down, reducing CO2 emissions; nobody, including the government, cares about that.

«Maybe the hot rodders of tomorrow are the people who want to get in there and see what they can do about increasing fuel economy.»

It took about one percent of the world economy to develop the modern infrastructure of clean water and indoor plumbing; that's roughly what will be required to get rid of «another kind of human waste» — carbon dioxide emissions from burning fuels.

We don't know whether what you claim are benefits of «cheap» fossil fuels can really be attributed to their low cost or not, as we can't go back and check on every case as its price impacts work their way through the economy, nor can we speculate about foregone benefits, or whether the benefits are due to the artificially reduced price of burning carbon or whether people would enjoy them (or even greater benefits) in a fair market, except by examining by Capitalist analysis.

What might be most significant about the U.S. commitment is that it details how we plan to achieve our carbon pollution goals through existing programs like the fuel economy standards for cars and trucks and upcoming rules to limit greenhouse gases from power plants.

Here is an example of what I'm getting at: * Climate change is a myth or conspiracy - The temperature record is phony - the consensus is just politics * Climate change is unproven - The models are wrong - One hundred years isn't enough evidence * It's not our fault - Volcano's emit way more CO2 - It could be natural variation * A warmer climate is nothing to worry about - It was warmer in the middle ages - A warmer climate is a good thing * Mitigation will destroy the economy - We don't know enough to act - Reducing fossil fuel will destroy us * It's too late or someone else's problem - Kyoto is too little too late - The US absorbs more CO2 than it emits This is very rough example, but if you think it is headed in the right direction, I'd be happy to go through your guide in more detail and come up with something concrete - just give me the word.

The best EPA - estimated fuel economy for the TLX is 23 MPG city and 33 MPG highway in the base 2.4 - liter trim, and that's about what we saw on our day - long test drive.