Sentences with phrase «what about nuclear energy»

(what about nuclear energy?)

What about nuclear energy?

Not exact matches

Energy and Capital editor Keith Kohl tells investors what they need to know about Iran's nuclear lies and reveals the winners and losers in the wake of Netanyahu's grim announcement.

«You always worry about what you haven't analysed,» says Chip Lagdon, chief of nuclear safety with the US Department of Energy.

«What DOE and NRC are concerned about are the things we don't know about,» Julie Keys, senior project manager for the Nuclear Energy Institute.

Re 92, Edward Greisch — from what I've read recently, nuclear, solar, and wind are about the same in CO2 output per unit energy, although I once read that solar put out less CO2 than nuclear.

What to do about existing plants, and how to chart a sustainable energy future with (or without) nuclear power are entirely separate questions.

My friend and sometime reporting partner Matt Wald has an important new story in our ongoing Energy Challenge series on what appears to be a shift from rhetoric about building new nuclear power plants to concrete action — if not yet the pouring of concrete.

Well, what about the subsidies for nuclear via the new Contracts for Difference system, which will run for 35 years at twice the current cost of energy?

What about the risks of nuclear energy?

What's strange about the fall of nuclear energy, especially older plants, is that it's losing primarily to natural gas in capacity bids and in new construction.

How does discourse about nuclear energy, climate change, and / or the environment manifest in mass media, popular culture, or social media and with what consequences?

If I can force you to guess, do you think that you'd find a similar (what you consider to be paradoxical) pattern play out with the associations between political views and beliefs about evolution / scientific expert opinion on evolution... or nuclear energy... or other issues that display a similar pattern of association between political orientation and interpretations of scientific evidence / how experts interpret that evidence?

Anyhow, it seems if what think as very unlikely [or impossible] were to occur, that people living in 2040 would see there is a problem and get serious about building and using nuclear energy so as to reduce future CO2 emission.