Sentences with phrase «what about the agenda»

What about the agenda of the organization that sponsored the observance?

Well, maybe it's a 50/50 issue and maybe it isn't, but what about the agenda - setting?

Not exact matches

An agenda helps everyone feel organized about what to expect and what will be expected of them during the meeting.

Meanwhile, at least some Trump supporters seem unclear about just what Resistance Radio is, mistaking it for real radio programming with a liberal agenda.

His win shattered predictions across the board, from pollsters to financial markets, and left many more questions than answers about what comes next — for President Obama's legacy, economic policy specifically and the governing agenda broadly.

Baby boomers and soon - to - be-retirees typically have retirement planning at the top of their agenda, but what about Millennials and younger generations?

Among the topics on the agenda: the evolution of shareholder activism and research findings about activist funds» returns, the amended Shareholder Rights Directive (EU) 2017/828, litigation and its effectiveness as tool for activist investors, and what can an issuer do to adequately address activists» new challenges.

According to reports, this speech will emphasize his «America first» agenda and could be incredibly critical of China and is more likely to reflect what we saw on the campaign trail about tearing down trade and reversing globalization.

I'm all about Life, and I'm all for abortions, but what's with the interracial agenda they are pushing with that black dude and the white girl with the red bow in her hair??? does anybody really expect that license plate to get approved in North Carolina??? come on...

If people don't get a firm idea from Romney about Romney's agenda, then all they know about Romney's agenda will be what they hear from President Obama and his allies.

Remain in Him as He remains in you, He knows what your agenda is that is why He chooses to speak to you about it!

what about rewriting, interpreting, rewording, influencing... RAPING a religious over hundreds and hundreds of years just to mold it into that which suits your personal needs, goals and agendas and call it truth?

Sabio: Are you saying that the biblical writers wrote what they did only out of political or social agendas without any sincere attempt to talk about what they called God?

What I DO care about is the candidate's agenda and how it affects me!

What I don't get is, being critical of Zionistic policies, agenda or people is quickly labeled as «anti-semitic» and is even considered illegal in countries like Germany, yet a bigoted person like Geert Wilders (who has not once consulted any expect or scholar on Islam) can make a video which literally embodies everything that hate, racism, and ignorance is about, and yet get away with it where the court recognizes it as «denigrating» but not «illegal»!?

Insistence on the importance of that point for theological education is one of the major contributions of the Mud Flower Collective to the agenda of the debate about what makes theological education theological.

Aside from also starting to post more photos on my blog (which idea I see you gleaned from monitoring my brainwaves as well), Dean and I were just talking about this story yesterday and how the point is not doing vs. being, but never being distracted from being a disciple; which is really just being close to Jesus, doing what he does, listening to what he says and going with his agenda instead of ours.

It's not about what's right, it's about Control, Money, Manipulation, Agenda, etc..

What about GREED Sarah... you didn't review that part of my posting... or that doesn't work in your «Christian» agenda

What they do know they get wrong and worst of all they don't talk about the parts that don't fit their agenda.

I was thinking of what David was writing in light of his recent posts about organized religion mandating a «vision» or «agenda» on people.

what's next??? are you going to inject your Gay prone agenda into an article about a manned mission to Mars, if it ever comes about?!

Do you really think that your agenda is what black community, as a whole, is concerned about?

What if we worried less about saying the right thing or trying to demonstrate our theological knowledge and just tried to simply love people — with no agenda.

My correspondents raise important questions about exactly what conservatives should be defending, in response to the massive expansion in recent decades of the powers, the agenda, and the budget of central government.

God's agenda is what is all about.

Quite aware of this vulnerability, and fully affirming that the Hindutva agenda must be subverted, what I am calling for is an internal debate within Christianity about the objective and implementation of mission activity within a pluralistic world - view.

ANYONE who has thier eyes open and who does not rely on the liberal media (who has said nothing about the 90 % rise in Gas prices since he came into office) Obama has done exactly what he said he was going to do, he is about «fundimental change» meaning enacting his leftist Black Nationalist agenda on the USA.

Jeremy good message and quite relevant for today God is still looking at our hearts and motives for serving him or are we serving our own agenda as Jonah was.He did nt feel compassionate towards his enemies and who could blame him they had cruelly killed many Jews it was a question of life or death to his own people.The Jewish nation was no more deserving of Gods grace than the other nations that is revealed by sending Jonah to preach a message of hope and life.Ultimately God calls all by faith in him and is willing to be merciful to all nations and peoples that do not not deserve it just like us it is by grace that we all are forgiven.I am pleased that God is sovereign and knows whats best he is merciful to us.Our human nature is that it is better to kill our enemies before they can kill us and that is essentially Jonahs message that is why he struggled to be obedient to Gods will.Gods message is to forgive those that trespass against us and show mercy.Its complicated and it is natural to protect ourselves and our families from those who would seek to destroy them but ultimately its about trusting God with everything easier said than done.If it comes to a choice we will have to trust God and ask for his strength because we cant do it in ours.As Christ laid down his life for us are we ready to lay our lives and the lives of our families as a sacrifice for him.To me that is where the story of Jonah is leading to we have the choice to fight our enemies or to love them as God loves them.brentnz

In 1968, Uppsala delegates proposed to «let the world establish the agenda» while at the same time turning a deaf ear to the question «What about the two billion (who, it was reckoned, had not yet heard the gospel)?»

When someone says «This is what the Bible says about Christian use of mass media,» it generally says as much about the context and agenda of the person doing the interpreting as it does about the biblical message.

What he actually said in the New York Times was: «The feminist agenda is not about equal rights for women.

Instead of putting some anti-Christian garbage on the front page which promotes a liberal agenda why not show how «fair» you are when it come to the news and carry a Christian view on say sodomy which is what we're talking about?

Read what Anne Carr, professor of theology at the University of Chicago, no less, says about it: «The text reads smoothly and beautifully, betraying no other agenda than a faithful rendition of the New Testament.»

Second, I'll just jump in here with Chad and say that I'm finding it amusing that lots of people are talking about «the Church» the way I hear «the Church» (yes, I know I'm doing it too) talk about the «Gay agenda» or «the atheists» as if there's some back room meeting that takes place between some group who decides things about what will and won't happen or how we'll all be (in any of those groups).

Either way, I loved that show; and I wish we could chat about it some more, but muffins are what's on the agenda today.

I rarely care what any former players think about these issues — they have their own agendas and biases.

What the LCFC fans are annoyed about is the late re-scheduling of the game, after they had bought their tickets, paid for the train / travel to London, in some cases booked an overnight stay and arranged their weekend around the game, only to find that the TV companies change it to suit their agenda.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

The papers love to have their agendas, and one theory has been claimed that moving to United would only be about money, and joining Pep would somehow have been because of footballing reasons, but what if City had been told that Man United was his dream?

Anyways what's this thing about «agenda against Arsene and Arsenal, mission which is «bash the club and Wenger»?

and not to forget that although MMA is a sport, what UFC is doing is not sport - related, it is simply an entertainment show which they are trying to «sportify» and legitmise via various means (e.g. stupid rankings, reebok etc.) so they have created this double standards, whenever they want they talk about rankings and merits etc. and when the agenda is something else, they talk about «big fights» and money fights...

How you could witness what the rest of us have these last few years and ever even consider saying Arsenal should beat these teams on financial and historical grounds is completely beyond my comprehension because their is no financial muscle flexed at Arsenal and these teams, even Marseille, are bigger spenders, as for the history, well the problem there is the man that made alot of that history is they current manager and he has no qualms about damaging it as long as he gets to employ his own agenda, which only he now seems to know what this actually is Arsenal deserve nothing on merit going into any game.

what the f**k are all these northern monkeys coming on an arsenal blog for - barton is a sneaky c ** t & knew what he was up to with a potential leg breaking follow through tackle & if any of you neanderthals know ANYTHING about football you'd admit it!but then again when an arsenal hating, useless prick, biased referee will let these thing go what do you expect - does help when you're up against 10 men, corrupt ref though - this i might remind you is the same ref who comically sent wenger to the statds at old trafford for throwing a bottle to the floor!the c ** t has an agenda against us & we sufferd as a result.

People can believe what they want, but when in the furtherance of their AGENDA they indicate that I am lying or that I'm some Wenger acolyte when all I did is point at the facts, and might I add, ALL the known facts which means that those facts don't lack context, about Wenger's Monaco days, it is something I am not prepared to accept meekly.

The agenda seems to be about maintaining the PL to be what they want it to be instead of just letting it be.

What I find unconscionable is why you would be giving her a hard time for worrying about her friend» sfeelings whether than the baby's life when you are using those feelings to further your agenda!

If health truly is what people are so concerned about whenever they're out, enforcing their breastfeeding agenda on every mom who will turn and lend an ear, then what about the health of new moms everywhere?

Just as our anonymous school food professional, «Wilma,» spoke last week about how hard it is to juggle parents» competing agendas for what the «ideal» lunch would look like, I find myself a bit flummoxed by this task.

Just as our anonymous school food professional, «Wilma,» spoke last week about how hard it is to juggle parents» competing agendas for what the «ideal» -LSB-...]