Sentences with phrase «what about the characters»

What about the characters and performances?

But what about the characters that weren't shown in the movie?

What about characters that need an internet connection to play with such as Baloo, the Civil War characters, Dory & Nemo, etc..?

What about character education, service learning?

Thus these are the quickest and outright fastest Boxsters yet, but what about that character?

What about the characters?

What about characters from newer Capcom games like Resident Evil 7?

What about characters that need an internet connection to play with such as Baloo, the Civil War characters, Dory & Nemo, etc..?

What about character traits?

Not exact matches

«It's not what Mark had in his head initially, and that's why he's spoken very openly about his being caught off guard by the script and where the character ends up,» Johnson said.

Focus not on quantity but on what the items betray about your character.

Heath points out that, when asked about what motivates wrongdoing, most people say it has a lot to do with greed, or with other deep character flaws.

Unlike the recent string of TV shows made into movies, like the «21 Jump Street» franchise, Peña said the intention with «CHiPs» is to be more serious in the hopes to make the audience care and be concerned about what the characters are going through.

What it's about: Finally, the characters in the Marvel Cinematic Universe came together in «The Avengers,» with Iron Man, Thor, Hulk, Captain America, and Black Widow fighting off Loki and his alien army.

«You look at what Trump says about America First, and most of it is very international in character and has a great deal of continuity with, say, US national security policy under Clinton, Bush, and in many ways even under Obama,» he says.

What it's about: Another Disney hit, «Bambi» uses an all - animal cast of characters in a story about a white - tailed deer, his animals friends, and a haunting death in the family.

What it's about: The plot isn't entirely coherent, but the third «Pirates» movie was a visual spectacle that had the characters sail off the edge of the map and find what lies beyWhat it's about: The plot isn't entirely coherent, but the third «Pirates» movie was a visual spectacle that had the characters sail off the edge of the map and find what lies beywhat lies beyond.

If you start disrupting books, especially about what little girls can be when they grow up, and if you start putting different characters in those stories, you're able to disrupt power in a very important way.

This is awesome post, but I want to know one thing, we know that Google crawls only 150 - 160 characters of title tag, so what about title tags for some miscellaneous titles like some project report of something like that?

If you have ever felt invested in a fictional character's fate in a movie, TV series or book, you know exactly what Ambrosi is talking about.

The research tells me less about what Walmart is doing right and more about the character and mindset of affluent Canadian shoppers versus American counterparts.

Instead of trying to make Him out to be something that our / your little minds can only conceive, try reading and listening to what the God of the Bible says about His character.

What I have always loved about his work is that they are not just scary stories, it's more about that characters and the decisions they make.

But we can strengthen our faith in His unchanging character through reading and trusting what He has revealed about Himself in Scripture.

Since last week, I've been thinking about how differently my life and / or the world (all mankind) might have been, had I / we been taught what has been revealed to me over the last 20 + years and now know in my mind / heart is the truth / gospel for me, about Father God's love, character and nature, the death of Jesus and Salvation.

If you're talking about the fictional character, most of what we currently know as Santa Claus developed from Dutch, German and Scandinavian folklore.

And «In my experience, it is only in Relationship that we can really know the character of Jesus, and whether or not that character seems to match up what some t - h - i - n - k they read about the Father in the Old Testament.»

In my experience, it is only in Relationship that we can really know the character of Jesus, and whether or not that character seems to match up what some t - h - i - n - k they read about the Father in the Old Testament.

Certainly, some things we believe in can been seen, but the great faith described in the rest of Hebrews 11 is the faith that is confident in God's promises based on what is known about God's character and God's Word.

That, at least, is my own hunch about the reason for the relative paucity of material about the family coming from the churches and the character of what material there is, What to do in such circumstanwhat material there is, What to do in such circumstanWhat to do in such circumstances?

But still: It's hard to diss a movie that displays so much of what's undeniably good about Amy Adams and Jennifer Lawrence — two attractive and fascinating characters.

But Americans have lost a sense of the limited character of what the military should be about, which I think is a very dangerous business.

Or does what I read about you better better inform me about your character than my relationship with you?

She articulates a practical way of living out what I learned in much of my faith - changing - books, about the nature and character of God, and how we translate that nature and character to our tinies.

That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't evil telling me to do bad things to people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll

This is why what Phil shares next about character and regret is so critical.

Am I the only one noticing that even the half - apologies and criticisms of Julie or of this forum generally are tending to prove the point and provide additional evidence about what was going on and the character of those involved?

Almost all of our theology and so, therefore, the way we live our lives tracks back to what we believe about the nature and character of God.

Unfortunately, none of that lines up with what has been said about Brian in this thread, and what has been revealed about his character through his bullshit apology.

It is indeed difficult to expatiate on the character of one's mentor, especially when so much of what we would speak about pertains to private exchanges and painstaking individual guidance.

What this character is saying about legacy, identity, and blackness in DIASPORA is so powerful.

It is our civic duty to study the candidates: their past performance and what you have learned about their specific character — not what you think you know about their religion.

Just as important, we make claims about what the world essentially is and about the character of the God who created it.

is simply too ingrained, too much a part of what sin is all about, for us not to feel vexed when reminders come of the opposite reality, which it is precisely the office of religion to provide: «Accordingly, it has always been the office of Religion to protest against the sophistry of Satan, and to preserve the memory of those truths which the unbelieving heart corrupts: both the freedom and the responsibility of man, the sovereignty of the Creator, the supremacy of the law of conscience as His representative within us, and the irrelevancy of external circumstances in the judgment which is ultimately to be made upon our conduct and character.»

If he talks about the event character (1 / 10th of a second in length and all that) of the self, it is because he thinks that is what analysis of self - consciousness itself discloses and not because he means to construct the self out of subhuman individuals or organisms (Shalom's «event - cells»).

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.

We might say that the constitutional rights of citizens are those that all political participants must explicitly accept in order to have a political discourse about what all political participants must explicitly accept in order to have a political discourse — and it is this character that makes the rights formative.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative.

Thus, while strictly speaking, the conjunction of a contingent statement — that oppression is real — with a metaphysically necessary statement — that God is G - of - A — yields what is technically another contingent statement — that God is G - of - O; there is a certain undeniable ineluctability about the truth that if oppression is real, then God can not fail to be G - of - O, which compels me to indicate its ineluctable character by saying that it is «restrictive yet necessary» (and here necessary does not mean metaphysical necessity).

It is the problematic character of this step which makes the ontological argument unsatisfactory as a proof of God's existence although in the case of Hartshorne himself it was perhaps taken, implicitly if not explicitly, when, as he tells us, «about the age of seventeen, after reading Emerson's Essays, I made up my mind (doubtless with a somewhat hazy notion of what I was doing) to trust reason to the end» (LP viii).