Not exact matches
House Democrats, led by Reps. Ted Lieu of California and Peter Welch of Vermont, also announced Thursday they are planning a broader probe into when other energy companies first understood that
fossil fuels drive climate change,
what they did with that information and whether they funded or participated in sowing doubt
about the matter.
Evolution makes predictions
about what we would expect to see in the
fossil record, comparative anatomy, genetic sequences, geographical distribution of species, etc., and these predictions have been verified many times over.
There is almost no
fossil evidence (which should be in abundance if true) and that
what we scientifically know
about life is that it reproduces according to its kind (which is all we have observed) and its highly complex.
The current rate of burning
fossil fuels adds
about 2 ppm per year to the atmosphere, so that getting from the current level to 1000 ppm would take
about 300 years — and 1000 ppm is still less than
what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the nasa or the Navy limit for human beings.
I was in my early twenties when I first encountered a
fossil record that didn't match
what I'd been taught in Sunday school
about the «myth» of evolutionary theory.
To say, as Joe says, that «God making evolution appear undirected is similar to the idea that he planted dinosaur
fossils and created geological strata to fool us into thinking the earth has been around more than 6,000 years,» is in my view completely to misunderstand
what scientists and ordinary people mean when they speak
about random processes.
• Conceits
about «
fossil fuel» divestment aside,
what comes through loud and clear is moral self - congratulation.
To illustrate the
fossil problem, here is
what a particularly vigorous advocate of Darwinism, Oxford Zoology Professor (and popular author) Richard Dawkins, says in The Blind Watchmaker
about the «Cambrian explosion,» i.e., the apparently sudden appearance of the major animal forms at the beginning of the Cambrian era:
They all yell «
what about the missing link!?!» Then we show them a
fossil showing a link between one species and and another.
Creationist «well,
what about the origin of the universe, the fact that the universe obeys laws, the origins of life on this earth, the fact that the largest «gaps» in the
fossil record correspond exactly with the organisms identified in the bible as being created by God, namely fish, birds, land animals and humans»
Some scientists are shaking up the dinosaur family tree and raising questions
about which features define the ancient reptiles, Carolyn Gramling reported in «New
fossils are redefining
what makes a dinosaur» (SN: 3/3/18, p. 18).
Fossils from terrestrial species from this region and time period are relatively rare, thus the find helps paleontologists fill in important missing pieces
about what prehistoric life was like on North American's East Coast.
And it gave us an opportunity to talk
about how the planet changes and evolves and [how]
what is the driest place on Earth today hasn't always been the driest place on Earth and that those high desert lakes were remnants of when the sea is used to be there, marine
fossils and coral in that high desert.
Fossil fuels cost a lot of money and [have] a lot of climate impact; that's something we haven't covered either, but this plan will also reduce carbon dioxide emissions to
about a third of
what they are now [by] 2050, assuming some level of growth as well.
But University of Chicago paleontologist Paul Sereno is ecstatic
about what he is finding as he sifts through the 20 tons of
fossils recovered there.
Part by part, Bramble and Lieberman have reinterpreted the hominid physique by juxtaposing bits of
fossil evidence with
what's known
about the physiology and biomechanics of jogging.
While McCrea's work focuses on
what footprint
fossils reveal
about behavior, researchers like Julia Day at the University of Cambridge in England have used print data to flesh out the big picture of dinosaur biomechanics.
Unfortunately, the earliest
fossils are just spores and don't reveal much
about what sort of plants they came from.
The editors respond: We thought the numbers in Dukes's study were fascinating for
what they reveal
about the amount of raw biomass needed to create a gallon of gasoline; however, due to space constraints, we could not go into greater detail
about fossil - fuel production and energy usage.
When Reich entered college, in 1992, most of
what scientists knew
about human evolution came from
fossils.
«These documents are breathtaking, and they reveal
what many of us have long suspected: That there is a campaign afoot by groups directly funded by the
fossil fuel industry and right - wing foundations such as Koch Industries to mislead the public
about climate change,» Pennsylvania State University climatologist Michael Mann wrote in an email to LiveScience.
About two dozen or so
fossils of the creature have been recovered, all of them from 240 - million - year - old rocks deposited as sediment on the floor of a shallow, 5 - kilometer - long lake in
what is now southern Germany.
For many
fossils, he says, «we are still scratching our heads
about what they are.»
«It's very mysterious at this point in time, we don't really know
what's contemplated there,» Fulton says, «If you piece together the different things that have been said by the president - elect
about fossil fuels, and encouraging
fossil fuel development, you'd expect this would have something to do with that.»
But
fossil flowers are scarce, and botanists have long speculated
about what the first blooms might have looked like.
What is known
about Denisovan ancestry comes from a single set of archaic human
fossils found in the Altai mountains in Siberia.
You've probably heard of Ethiopia's famous
fossil hominin Lucy, but
what about South Africa's equally important Little Foot?
«Normally, we look at a variety of thick, dense objects at Los Alamos for defense programs, but the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science was interested in imaging a very large
fossil to learn
about what's inside,» said Ron Nelson, of the Laboratory's Physics Division.
What's interesting is that they went back in the frozen
fossil record, I was telling [you]
about, they found exactly where this change happened, and it appeared that the citrate eaters started becoming more common and then rare and then more common again and then they took off, which suggests that there are a lot of mutations that took place to make this happen.
One of the chapters in the book is
about this recent finding in the Arctic by Neil Shubin and Ted Daeschler and Farish Jenkins; this spectacular transition from fish to four - legged land animal, exactly right, filling part of sort of the periodic table, of the
fossil record and knowing where to look,
what age rock to look in, and of course, a pretty big element of luck.
This week we have stories on strange dimming at a not - so - distant star, sending sperm to the International Space Station, and
what the
fossil record tells us
about how baleen whales got so ginormous with Online News Editor David Grimm.
MEACHEM: We would really love to discover some more mammal
fossils down there and
what we're really hoping to get out of these mammal
fossils is some good ancient DNA, that will tell us
about the conditions that these animals lived in and how DNA or genes changed with climate.
I am looking at
fossil reptiles — specifically, lizards, crocodylians, and turtles — that lived in the Western Interior of
what is now the United States from
about 66 to 23 million years ago.
In addition to providing evidence
about what early life was like on our own planet, the
fossils had important implications for life elsewhere in the solar system.
These
fossils are enlightening because they reveal something
about how prehistoric animals moved and
what they ate.
What can
fossil evidence tell us
about the way extinct animals lived their lives?
What can the
fossil record tell us
about how seals and sea lions evolved into the animals they are today?
As a Creationist,
what about all the other radioisotope methods for dating the rock surrounding the
fossils?
Learn
about carbon dating and find out
what the carbon
Fossils are the remains of once - living things.
Peek - a-Boo Panda Let's Eat Dirt Earth's
Fossils Let's Take a Bath Milk a Cow Act It Out Our Revised «Little Bo Peep» Rub, Rub, Rub A Fun Fingerplay Read
About Animals Lamb Pop Puppet Poetry Froggy Fun
What's the Problem?
«I teach them
about what they are looking for in advance, and they can take home as many
fossils as they can carry.»
This activity includes information
about what fossil fuels are and how they...
«I was reading somewhere — I can't remember where —
about what the
fossil record of this particular time will be,» Fox said.
Updates below InsideClimate News, showing the value of focused and sustained investigative reporting, has published the first piece in an illuminating review of
what Exxon Mobil Corp. (and its earlier incarnations) learned through its own research from the 1970s onward
about the potential climate impacts of rising emissions of carbon dioxide from
fossil fuel use.
Feed - in tariffs on
fossil energy imports to the United States would surely end up reducing demand for
fossil fuels as more and more renewable capacity became available — which is exactly
what you would want to see happen if you are serious
about slowing the rate of global warming.
What I find ironic is that it is his can - do optimism that is in this case working against our ability to do something
about our dependence on
fossil fuels and the climate change that this dependence is resulting in, that is, switching to alternate energy, preserving modern civilization and the world economy beyond Peak Oil and Peak Coal, preventing climate change from becoming such a huge problem that it destroys that the world economy — and more than likely leads to a series of highly destructive wars over limited resources.
What is more important is that the fossil - fuel industry knew about the danger in the 1970s, perhaps even the 1960s, and what they did about it was to fund a massive campaign of den
What is more important is that the
fossil - fuel industry knew
about the danger in the 1970s, perhaps even the 1960s, and
what they did about it was to fund a massive campaign of den
what they did
about it was to fund a massive campaign of denial.
As for The Oil Drum, with all due respect, I have observed that most commenters there are rather myopically focused on
fossil fuels and hold opinions
about solar and wind that seem to be not well informed by knowledge of
what is actually happening with those industries today.
What that sciencey - sounding gibberish
about «unproved variables» means is that you don't want to see trillions of dollars in wealth shift from the
fossil fuel corporations to other sectors of the industrial economy, therefore, anthropogenic global warming can not be true.
What about hydropower, which is billed as a sustainable form of electricity generation because it produces far fewer greenhouse gas emissions than
fossil fuels?