Schools actually narrow the achievement gap; it's
what affluent children get before they start school that gives them significant academic advantages over the children of the middle class and the poor, according to the research.
Not exact matches
Affluent children showed the greatest uncertainty about
what to do and how to act in given circumstances.
Children who live in poverty are as worthy of attending good schools as their more
affluent counterparts, and much is known about
what it takes to transform schools into places that better meet their needs.
He says
what matters is getting «a first - rate education,» and low - income parents of color don't believe «that their
children can't learn well if they're not sitting alongside
affluent white kids.»
«Putnam's data verifies
what many of us have seen anecdotally, that the
children of the more
affluent and less
affluent are raised in starkly different ways and have different opportunities.»
Charter schools have been seen as a way to give parents in low - income areas a choice in schooling much like
what more
affluent families have always had by moving into a better school district or putting their
children in a private school.
Quite often, public schools of choice are to low - income families
what private schools are to more
affluent families, Swagerty says, adding that she loves the fact that charters give low - income families the option to «make smart decisions about
what's best for their
children.»
One hundred and sixty black leaders, part of the charter lobby, signed a letter encouraging the NAACP to back off, saying: «For many urban Black families, charter schools are making it possible to do
what affluent families have long been able to do: rescue their
children from failing schools.»
In the U.S., where 87 % of white students attend a majority white school, many middle - class and
affluent urbanites grapple with
what Mike Petrilli calls the Diverse Schools Dilemma: Should I send my
child to a local public school that offers racial, cultural, and economic diversity or to a more homogenous — but perhaps higher - performing — school?
They have been opened as a way to save
children in struggling inner - city school systems; as destinations for
children of
affluent parents wishing to avoid
what they view as the pitfalls of public schools; and as laboratories that, in theory, can pass along successful new ideas to public schools across the country.