Sentences with phrase «what arguement»

Whether our topping the table will be for real depends on what arguement Leicester City will put forward on Tuesday night.

Not exact matches

(This next part takes some logic so brace yourself) By making that part of your arguement you are implying a connection between what you said and what I said.

Why do you keep talking about them as if it were a rational arguement against what I said?

But you, when you don't like how I pharase my arguements and debate with others; when I use what YOU consider meannest and bullying, you then have the right to use words like «Bully, arrogant, sarcastic, antagonistic attitude,» you are just the righteous DEFENDER.

The problem is that very few people what to have this rational discussion — they want to have an emotional arguement and play a game of «my god is better / kinder / bigger / badder than your god.

I love how you think their fools for simply trying to do what they think is right oh and it is right its gods will and why does this automatically turn into an arguement over religion?

Fishion... I assume that you believe lesbianism / homosexuality are immoral becuz the Bible says so and, more importantly, what you believe the Bible to be.But can you on other grounds provide a compelling arguement to support the charge of immorality?Nobody really needs the Bible to believe that murder, stealing and lying are wrong, but there are situations that lying and stealing wd be permissable under a moral law, maybe not murder, but at least the taking of another life in war or self - defense, etc..

For example — Often used by many christians as an arguement for intolerence towards human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.

What about my arguement is wrong?

So trying to bring in what you did is to change my context of my arguement, as you so apply stated from Oct. 14th 7:42 pm.

You often will lambast some of those you argue with for the «I don't care what you say» arguement, and I'm surprised you went there.

Assuming ga y marriage happens what stops the pedos from using the same arguements... they are born that way... I feel that way.

So, FiF, based on your arguement for non-violence --- what is your take on Obama having armed body guards who will kill in an instant to save his life?

ok, ok, ok, i get it both sides think they are telling the truth there are no lyers here on this blogs only misinform people talking about two separate subjects yet thinking they are talking about the same thing the existence of god... one side believe the other doesn't what's wrong with that... sooner or later they'll changed their minds and one side will believe and the other won't so the arguement will forever be the same about two separate aguement on the same blog... but its definitely entertaining to read the comebacks... keep up the good work you all... its just as fun to read what the believer have to say as to what the nonebeliever have to say... after all it keeps all getting to know eachother better on what we believe right???

I expect that many of the arguements center on what «things» the family money should go towards.

What??? If this was in anyway true... which it isn't... the only way you would know this is if you were a Muslim... but then by your own arguement, you wouldn't be telling us this.

But on what premise do you assmue Schneidlin would be on the bench?this is a hollow arguement, with no evidence or proof

i know im not the only one who suspected this whole relationship going public was a work for the shows on E! The constant arguement made against that was something to the extent of «what does john gain from that» and thats a fair point when you take physical attraction out of it.

For what its worth I agree that Labour are focusing too much on the cost of living arguement, but your statement I commented on clearly contradicted the point you were making.

Given what little I know about physiology and the Krebs cycle it seems as though this arguement carries enough weight that it must be something you have looked into.

Every day, whether on the tv news programs, the newspapers, or online reports, the main topic is pro and con statements and arguements about what can be done, or needs to be done by usually someone else.

This leads to a more utilitarian arguement that, at what point is it better (economically for the state) for the state to enable people to live more prosperous, productive lives rather than leave them to rely on the state for subsistence?

The second argument is what's known as an arguement from incredulity.

In all the arguements about CO2 levels, to my knowledge nobody has yet mentioned what the optimum or normal level is.

right after a well thought out devil advocate arguement, and im like, «HAHAHHA» this guy, «HAHAHAHA» what a hillarious guy.

What is funny about this issue from a personal side, I'm supposed to take the other side arguements as gospel and believe everything that is said.

is absolutely correct, Barry Hanna of the Real Estate Training Institute, Edmonton Alberta had informed a group of Realtors (R) at a credited course he had spoken directly to a Lawyer who was contemplating a «arguement» against the Real Estate Purchase Contract, just think what this guy would think he could do with even a volunteered Property Disclosure.

This is one case, by the way, and dissenting justices make compelling arguement that is similar to what I've seen in NC.