After carefully reading the coda, I think I can see where Prothero is coming from, but he does a poor job in writing an objective account of
what atheism, represents.
For all his seeming knowledge of the religions he explains, he doesn't appear to have a firm grasp on
what atheism is.
You explain it to them, and explain it to them, and still some christians can't figure out
what atheism is.
avdin, you might want to look up
what atheism is.
Like I said, please understand
what atheism is before you decide that all atheists are communist murderers
Trying to minimizing that important criticism by our inclusion I see as misunderstanding
what Atheism is not.
You do not even know
what atheism is.
They insisted that every serious atheist must think out fully
what atheism logically entails, even if they did not succeed in doing so themselves.
Please educate yourself on
what atheism is before you denounce an entire group of people as being «wild.»
Perhaps if he loves his atheist baby, he will start to be more open - minded about
what atheism really is about.
I don't think you know
what atheism is or at least you don't understand some of the debates you've found youself in.
Anyway, if he still believes in God, then he isn't really an atheist, and will never know what it's like to truly be one, since that is
what atheism means — having no belief in any kind of god.
This is your opinion on
what atheism means to you,, which is why you can not name one atheist who thinks that way.
The fundamental problem with you «finisher» is that you don't understand
what atheism is.
You don't even know
what atheism means!
There has been some confusion expressed by Christian here about
what atheism is and what atheists believe.
That's
what atheism means intrinsically.
As for calling atheism a religion, that is simply incorrect and demonstrates the maker of the statement either fundamentally misunderstands
what atheism is and / or has an agenda to push.
@Just Me — you are the intolerant one, claiming to know
what atheism is, when it's quite obvious that you don't know.
You still obviously don't know
what atheism entails, «ATHEISM = RELIGION», otherwise you would not have picked one of the stupidest monikers I've seen on the BB.
Gabriel: If you want to know
what atheism is REALLY all about, ask a real atheist.
Being so ignorant of
what atheism means that your study picks what are possibly the world's least happy atheists and uses them as your sample exaggerates any existing differences
It shows that you are completely clueless about
what atheism is.
There seems to be no common accepted definition on
what atheism means.
No matter
what atheism is, it doesn't change religion.
Either way, the argument of
what atheism has been done an untold number of times and is usually brought up to divert attention from the subject at hand.
Perhaps some atheists believe that, but that's not
what atheism means.
The nicest thing I can say to you is that you are completely and totally ignorant about
what atheism is, not to mention, ignorant about what science says about our creation.
All the survey demonstrates is that a large number of people are ignorant and have no understanding of
what atheism is.
Many atheists come to the same conclusion, but that's not
what atheism is.
Maybe instead of spending all this time trying to tear down everyone that doesn't buy his religion he should spend his resources trying to use his religion of science and naturalism (which is
what atheism really is) to come up with something to better this world.
Actually Jesus you're wrong about
what Atheism said, prayer changes things by not doing anything and allowing the natural (disastrous) course of events to transpire.
I also don't think I need to point out to you that using only part of a definition fundamentally changes the word and definition itself, so to take only parts out to prove
what atheism does do as «religious» is flawed and destroys your argument.
Believers need to be educated as to
what atheism / agnosticism really means.
= > that is a fascinating response on a couple different levels, that response is precisely
what atheism is all about.
If this is a true statement, then
what atheism lacks is a consistent basis to brand an action is unethical.
Not exact matches
An article on
atheism was posted on a belief blog... so
what part of why atheists are posting here don't you get?
Can't be too intelligent, as you seem to misunderstand that
atheism, like any form of theism, is strictly a belief, and
what a person believes has ZERO BEARING on how intelligent they can BECOME.
No,
what poisons everything is
atheism / secular humanism as evidenced by the fact that 93 % of all of humanity's wars were started for non-religious purposes.
@
atheism is not healthy:
what kind of prayer?
What the amorality of
Atheism entails is a lack of obligation to any system of morality.
Atheism and theism are statements of
what you do or don't BELIEVE.
Lack of purpose outside of self is contrary to
what you claim to be true therefore
atheism is a contradiction
What we * can * say, however, is that it's unlikely her
atheism was based on the solid arguments and opinions that many atheists have come to realize.
ATHEISM does not make claims about
what was before the BIG BANG either.
Reading many of these posts here,
what is being proposed is Anarchy, not just
Atheism.
If
atheism is about
what you believe rather than
what you know then tell me
what makes atheist different from christians?
You said I don't know anything about hard or soft
atheism, an assumption on you're part so tell me
what is it to you?
This is
what makes
atheism the default position.
Zeus on the other hand has been proven real, he said so himself and he said everyone, all the other gods in other cultures are fakes...» = > upon
what are you basing your positive belief (you slipped up there in acknowledging
atheism requires a positive disbelief in a diety