Sentences with phrase «what changes the government»

«Visit the CRA website a few times a year and see what changes the government is putting into place,» says Hamel, who explains how tax changes are made not just at budget time, but at other times during the year so it's crucial to stay up to date.

We will see over the next five years what changes the government is able to make, but the good news is that overall Canadian employers are optimistic about the year ahead.

As a result, there was unnecessary confusion and effort spent by Indigenous people and other stakeholders about what the government plans to do, which Minister will be responsible for it, and what changes the government will consider.

Not exact matches

Once the US government had what they needed we knew our life was going to change.

Kathleen Harrington, chair of Policy of Government Relations for the Mayo Clinic, said so far she likes what she hears from Republicans on changes to health insurance.

«Opportunity comes with change,» Collins told CNBC, noting nonetheless that «understanding what's going to happen to the U.K. is hard because the government itself doesn't seem to know either.»

In 2013, the government has tightened regulations on ingredients, restaurants have changed up their menus and customers gained greater knowledge of what goes into their food.

«The government has changed the rules on Social Security, for example, so what's to stop them from diluting the benefits of this plan in the future?

Furthermore, what if watching South Korean dramas encourages people to leave North Korea rather than stay and try to change the government?

«Everything would have been very difficult... but luckily a majority decided to change and overcome the resignation they wanted to put on us,» Macri added, in what appeared to be a critical reference to Kirchner's government and supporters.

Republicans said the internet will operate essentially the same without what they see as heavy - handed government rules, while Democrats said the repeal will allow internet providers to change how people access content.

The accompanying message: the world is changing fast, but fear not, this government knows «what Canadians need to succeed in an evolving economy.»

In my wilder flights of fancy, I wonder what creative means the government could employ to actually change the ownership structure of traditional media.

Canada should understand this and act to support what we have achieved, as well as help Mexico convince our mutual neighbour to change the new government's misguided and damaging attacks on our common objectives: more prosperity, more economic growth and more competitiveness for all three nations.

In the wake of the PPF report, Liberal government sources were telling some reporters in Ottawa that election - law changes are on the way, quite likely in line with what's suggested in this latest report.

Neither Ottawa nor Alberta's provincial government has a plan in place to address what happens when the imperatives of confronting climate change make depressed oil prices the norm.

What the media have forgotten is that this Government has fundamentally changed the nature of the budget.

What you may not have realized is that it is not bitcoin that will change our lives, but other applications of blockchain technology in areas such as payments, contracts and the provision of government services.

What impact has a change in government had on this measure?

«This report is yet another example of what we have seen over and over again from this government: big promises, but no clear direction, and ultimately no real change for children and youth,» said New Democrat children and family development critic Carole James.

What's changed is the share of government revenue collected from personal income tax.

For us in Canada, what is equally perplexing is that all this is coming from a government that campaigned on a promise of «Real Change.»

«The B.C. Liberal government did not bother to find out what impact these changes would have on coastal economies and communities before announcing them — but we will make sure they hear about it,» said Trevena.

On Thursday, while exploring the implications of the federal government's tariff changes that were announced in last month's budget, I made what I believed to be a shocking discovery.

When asked what changes they wanted the next municipal government to pursue in regards to transportation, 49 per cent chose «Properly fund transportation and transit development without shifting the burden further on to business.»

Through regular polling of our membership, we are privy to an up - to - date, firsthand perspective regarding the state of the economy, as well as their feedback concerning what changes need to be made to government policies.

He helped draft the «Defense of Marriage Act,» the 1996 law in which the federal government defines marriage as a legal union between one man and one woman, and is the author of «Fighting for America's Soul: How Sweeping Change Threatens Our Nation and What We Must Do.»

They not only have no clue as to how our government works or what it takes to change laws, they wouldn't know a good president from a hole in the ground if they didn't first ask their pastor or fox news pundit their opinion.

To advocate self - help, to argue that affirmative action can not be a long - run solution to the problem of racial inequality, to suggest that some of what is transpiring in black communities reflects a spiritual malaise, to note that fundamental change will require that individual lives be transformed in ways that governments are ill - suited to do, to urge that we must look to how black men and women are relating to each other, how parents are bringing up their children, that we have to ask ourselves what values inform the behavior of our youth» to do these things is not to take a partisan position, or vent some neoconservative ideological screed.

Since public opinion, or world opinion, or the opinion of governments in general has become a powerful factor in the situation, and since the West must depend very much on capturing the opinion and the sympathy of what might be called the uncommitted powers, our future is going to depend on the kind of internationalism which does not attempt to freeze the existing situation in a legalistic manner but takes the lead in predicting and preparing the necessary changes in the status quo.

I do not agree with the catholic teachings so I don't go to their church.I went to a church for many years and when they went a different way than what I believe I stopped going to it.I didn't try to change them.Government and a church will never agree on everything and its not the church job to change government and the government should not change a church beliefs.If you are a member of a church and do not agree with them anymore you should leave that church.

Neville i mentioned those people only because the discussion was talking about dominionism the combination of the church and state as a governing rule all those people were government leaders all of them suffered in there own way.Its was the suffering that prepared them for the roles that they were to play and there faith in God was what helped them get through.We are made stronger in our weakness no matter how important or unimportant we may appear to others.I guess it is easy to fall into the lie about political involvement that its hard to make change but some people have had a huge impact.Really it is God who deserves the praise he is the one that creats the opportunitys to make impact on the world as in our strength we can do nothing.In hebrews the great men and woman of faith there are those that seemed unimportant to the world and many suffered for there faith Our Lord knows everyone by name and every small act of faith we do he remembers because we do it out of our love for him that is what the christian walk is about living for Jesus and sharing that love with others.brentnz.

Only the tax collectors and the government knew what the tax rate was, and it was always changing anyway, so the tax collectors could basically charge the people anything they wanted.

The nature of religious television in America can be seen to be a function of the interaction of four main players; changes over the past decades have come about because of changes in the relative power and relationships of the four following players: (1) the regulatory agencies of the federal government, which, through the legislative process, provide the structure within which interaction inside the television industry takes place; (2) the television industry, primarily network and local station managements, which control the airwaves within the legislated structure; (3) the viewing public, which selects what it is that will be watched; and (4) the religious broadcasters who provide the material for broadcasts.

Jesus addressed the people and made no attempt to change the government (give onto Cesar what is Cesars and onto the Lord what is the Lords).

Guess what, folks — John Kennedy never used his catholocism to effect change in our government.

When Our Saviour Yeshua Mashiah came it is importnat to note that he didn't try to change the Romans i.e the government at that time as His thing was not against them, he came to help people as individuals and its only when we as people change can we begin to see change in the world and this is why God is a very personal experince and not religious, we need teachers but not the religious types, we need teachers who guide us to God with us and this is what Our Saviour did, we have the freedom to choose but we can only choose if we have what to choose from and being informed helps us to do this

I had it read by both the [Palestinian] Fatah organization and the Israeli government, and both of them gave me a list of corrections that they wanted changed, and gave me guidance about what they thought was right and wrong.

Calling for more support for struggling families, Milton said: «There's always more that government can do and we are really grateful for improving relationships with government - the ability to talk to them about what should change and could change.

however what happened in reality was that protesters raised the hammas» demands tenfold, the israeli government refused to initiate a military opperation to rescue gilad — which is the logical solution to this crisis (and the israelies had their chances during operation cast led and even afterwards... in fact, the israeli intelligence knew and still knows the exact location of shalit, but since the failure of the nahson vaxman rescue operation the israellie's government position on rescue operations changed dramatically.)

What current atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration tells us about the need to stabilise the global climate and the need for a step change in government, city and business action.

The changes we expected is what we are experiencing here in Nigeria by the APC government....

Even with asubstantial change in policy, there will still be an enormous set of gapsbetween what the market will produce and what the government can provide.

When I say I don't believe in marriage, what I mean to say is: I understand the financial and legal benefits, but I don't believe the government or a church or a department store registry can change the way I already feel and behave.

The government periodically asks thousands of teens and younger adults what they think about changes in U.S. family relationships.

yes all the health organizations change their mind about it all the time, first it was to a year then it is as long as you want, next it will be well we were wrong a year is it... Yes lead your life as a lamb and go off of what the government says....

They will not tell your child that his strengths lie elsewhere, that their school objectives will change and move according to what a government official states, but that he has his own strengths, abilities and talents.

As a respected leader in what is arguably the most vibrant land conservation community in this country, Mass Audubon is well - positioned to shape climate change response strategies by land trusts and our government partners.

As a respected leader in what is arguably the most vibrant land conservation community in this country, Mass Audubon stands well positioned to shape climate change response strategies by land trusts and our government partners.

Food companies that produce frozen pizzas for schools, the salt industry and potato growers requested the changes, and some conservatives in Congress say the federal government shouldn't be telling children what to eat.