Sentences with phrase «what church leadership»

And that's what the church leadership have done over and over, and continue to do, trying to be relevant, and the church is dying as a result.

I Am a Church Member uses guilt and fear to get new church members to do what the church leadership wants.

Not exact matches

I was amazed at first, then after several hours, my amazement turned to disappointment, disappointment that — I had never known that what I was experiencing was experienced by every man in the church, including the leadership.

However... what happens when Christine wishes to teach Sunday School or become more and more involved in the life of the church in a leadership position?

Fact is many men who are in leadership or positions of power in Church, business, entertainment, sports, etc., feel it is their unilateral right to have access to sluts, regardless of what the Bible says or any other moral teachings.

These changes in the numerical balance, together with the increasing replacement of American missionaries by nationals in leadership positions at the lower levels of church structure, have inevitably raised the issue of when and to what extent the distribution of leadership and other staff at headquarters will reflect these developments.

We are in the process of finding a non-Calvinist church (at least among the leadership) and I am finding out what a strong segment of the church population is now Calvinist.

There are many inside church leadership that are seeking to create the right conversation on what must happen within «organized religion» to create a compelling attraction for this group of adults.

What is less clear to me is why complementarians like Keller insist that that 1 Timothy 2:12 is a part of biblical womanhood, but Acts 2 is not; why the presence of twelve male disciples implies restrictions on female leadership, but the presence of the apostle Junia is inconsequential; why the Greco - Roman household codes represent God's ideal familial structure for husbands and wives, but not for slaves and masters; why the apostle Paul's instructions to Timothy about Ephesian women teaching in the church are universally applicable, but his instructions to Corinthian women regarding head coverings are culturally conditioned (even though Paul uses the same line of argumentation — appealing the creation narrative — to support both); why the poetry of Proverbs 31 is often applied prescriptively and other poetry is not; why Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob represent the supremecy of male leadership while Deborah and Huldah and Miriam are mere exceptions to the rule; why «wives submit to your husbands» carries more weight than «submit one to another»; why the laws of the Old Testament are treated as irrelevant in one moment, but important enough to display in public courthouses and schools the next; why a feminist reading of the text represents a capitulation to culture but a reading that turns an ancient Near Eastern text into an apologetic for the post-Industrial Revolution nuclear family is not; why the curse of Genesis 3 has the final word on gender relationships rather than the new creation that began at the resurrection.

I believe in order for a multi-site church to operate effectively, it will require a leadership structure where God - called leaders have the authority to do what God has called them to do: lead!

We can also ask: What kind of leadership do our churches need in a world heading for disaster?

«But the cheating isn't what caused this to flare up into a Defcon 1 crisis for which the entire church leadership had to be mobilized.

So there is a connection between authoritarian leadership in the church and the church's present difficulty in distinguishing what is central to the gospel from what is not.

Perhaps the question as to what their church - relationship means is asked less searchingly among us because of the apparent self - evidence of the answer: we are preparing ministerial leadership for the churches.

Each issue contains new articles and insights on leadership training, updates on what's been added to BuildingChurchLeaders.com, and other practical help to build faithful and effective leaders in your church.

The church world needs to trash their business leadership manuals and pay attention to what someone like Brad / futuristguy has to say about healthy church systems.

I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective on gender, (a position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.

It isn't because I don't love the Church, that was Jesus» idea after all, it's what it has become under current leadership.

What is required must come from the Church herself: courage, good leadership, faith and commitment on the part of the Church's members and especially her bishops.

If women are celebrated, empowered and given freedom to exercise their gifts in leadership as God intends, imagine what it could do for the global Church — God's kingdom on Earth as He intended — a glorious, united and beautifully vibrant people.

I am 60 years old, grew up in a very legalistic cultic church, been part of several church leaderships, served as pastor of a start up church, read and went to many, many, many church growth conferences, wanted to reach the lost, always trying to find the best structures, the best form of church, and what type of bells and whistles will attract people to church.

A useful group - life checklist allowing participants to rate a group on communication, acceptance of persons, leadership, climate of relationships, and other aspects can be found in Philip Anderson's Church Meetings that Matter.10 Evaluation is not a frill; rather it is essential to discovering what you are accomplishing in groups and how you can do better.

They can help us understand Scripture, let people know what to expect in our churches, and help guide leadership decisions.

The author sees the nature of the ordained ministry in terms of functions, or what the minister actually does, by examining the biblical bases and the historical development of ministry, and concludes that the church can only function with competent professional leadership.

What would your «future perfect» look like in terms of men, women and church leadership and what must happen for this to be realiWhat would your «future perfect» look like in terms of men, women and church leadership and what must happen for this to be realiwhat must happen for this to be realised?

But what he hears in church is not a substitute for his own study and his leadership of his family in such study.

What he meant, in his put - down of parson - presidents, was that the churches were not providing leadership for the new universities any more than they were providing financial subsidy.

Beginning with the that that we are what we think, Dr. Earl Radmacher invites the readers to take a journey of the mind, and then begin to transform their mind by beginning to think right about God, church, church leadership, and a variety of other topics.

Let us begin with the reaction against Jansenism, or what is often called Jansenism, in the Irish Church and the claim of more recent failure in leadership by the Irish hierarchy.

But the sex - abuse crisis prompted the bishops to give the NRB a mandate to examine the «causes and context» of what went wrong with the Church's leadership and what should be done about it.

On issues such as women in church leadership, and other religions, we are free to come to a «developed, or even different, view» from what we find in the canon, just like William Wilberforce did with slavery; but that is ok, because the word of God is «ultimately a person, not a manuscript».

No matter what direction the Church leadership in Rome or America takes, people like me will continue to make the Church better from within.

Greeley is appropriately critical of authoritarian patterns of leadership, casually dissenting on aspects of the Church's teaching (notably on sexuality), delightfully acerbic on the terrorism perpetrated by liturgists, and pastorally wise about things that can be done to make parish life more winsomely reflective of what he likes to call the Catholic imagination.

The biggest thing that promotes and lets this denial continue is the «Don't talk, don't ask...... just trust that the leadership is doing what's right» rule in many churches.

I hold a lay leadership position at my church so I'm fully aware of the struggle churches face about what to do with those outside the «family» demographic.

As you say you have a degree in World Religions and the History of Science and a postgraduate degree in Representation and Modernity ---------- I just have an associates degree in Church leadership ------ so you misunderstand my lack of education and my ablities to present my views clearly, compared to your abilities, as patronizing -------------- No TIGGY, what I just said THAT IS PATRONIZING you.

In the context of the church, what are leadership abilities other than gifts of the Spirit?

Steinfels» recent book, A People Adrift: The Crisis of the Roman Catholic Church inAmerica, looks back longingly to what he views as the inspiring leadership of such figures as Joseph Cardinal Bernardin of Chicago and Rembert Weakland of Milwaukee, and laments the era of John Paul II and Ratzinger, now become Benedict XVI.

When it seemed clear that he was expected to give a speech, he stood up and mentioned what we had discussed on our afternoon walk: that this was something of a historical event, the last of the old - style missionaries, and that to him it meant that now the church was 100 per cent on its own for indigenous leadership.

According what YOU have said, what the church has said and what Kate has said, it appears that the only thing Kate did that did not «follow the counsel» was the fact that she asked her question about authority and leadership!

The results of this strategy included the effective destruction of the Church in Hungary, whose leadership became a subsidiary of the Hungarian communist party; the thorough penetration of the Vatican by Warsaw Pact intelligence agencies (to the benefit of communist negotiators); and the undercutting of Catholic leaders in Poland and in what was then Czechoslovakia.

She said: «In all sorts of ways, I think what it says is that for most... people and places in the Church in Australia, the issue of women's leadership is really no longer an issue.»

If this doesn't justify lifetime removal from church leadership, what does?

Note, then, that what makes theological education of this type theological is that it is ordered, not theocentrically, but ecclesiocentrically — to understanding church, or more exactly, to understanding church leadership, not to understanding God.

Note secondly a deep irony in the «Berlin» type of excellence in theological education: Although what makes it properly «theological» is its goal (as «professional» education) of nurturing the health of the church by preparing for it excellent leadership, what entitles it to a home in the wissenschaftlich education it needs is the rather different goal of nurturing the health of society as a whole (for which professional church leadership is a «necessary practice»).

when what really happened was the church leadership passed on their oppotunity to be courageous and stand up for what their religion is supposed to be about and kowtowed to a group of cowardly racists who wouldn't even attach their name to their hate because they know it be shameful and small minded.

Unfortunately, many churches today believe in and even want a form of leadership that looks exactly like what Jesus warned against.

Based on what people told us, very few left one church and moved to another because they were angry or because of a major disagreement with the leadership of the old church.

What is blatently obvious, is that once Constantine legalized Christianity, women were banned from the church leadership.

The moment I joined a church the list of things I was strongly pushed to do lines up exactly with what Jeremy listed but add years in leadership roles (to what end I now ask).