Sentences with phrase «what claims you've»

But before you try to put a ring on that Ring Ding, know that not all chocolate is not what it claims to be.

She also blessed us with what she claims are the best ever chocolate chip cookies.

This cake is just what it claims to be and needs the help of some applied apricot jam or dunking in the coffee.

If the Bible is not what it claims for itself, then all is LOST!

I do mean to suggest that we can begin by assuming that what each claims to be true — claims with greatest confidence based on its primary revelation and surest intuitions — is true.

What claims can tradition have in a culture that values immediacy over everything else, and that has come to expect an update every five minutes?

Nowhere in this tome does one find a statement of (let alone any enthusiastic support for) the authentic place of religion in our being» where it fits, what it claims, and what it adds.

There is little or no evidence for much of what she claims is true — really — the earth was destroyed by water because angels mated with humans?

I find you conclusion of rejecting Neitzch and welcoming Einstein interesting with «sympathy, education, social ties and needs» being what he claims should determine a man's ethical approach.

Hence by analogy faith, or the Christian understanding of self, owes its distinctiveness to its inseparable relation to the act of God in Christ which encounters me in the word... for we know that the act of God is what it claims to be only when we realize that it happened pro me.»

In the light of that with critical engagement, it would be to onus on the character to prove his point about «God» not changing, to provide evidence and make therefore a reasoned proposition for what he claims to be true so it can be considered.

But not everything that pretends to be the Word of the Holy Spirit is what it claims to be.

His humor is lacking no matter what he claims.

The fact that jesus claimed to be the messiah and that people followed him and believed in his message does not automatically make him what he claims to be.

That is, it is not necessarily what it claims to be or what others claim it to be.

With biblical «conservatives» he shares reverence for the sense of the given text, the «last» text.8 He is not concerned to draw inferences from the text to its underlying history, to the circumstances of writing, to the spiritual state of the authors, or even to the existential encounter between Jesus and his followers.9 Indeed, Ricoeur, in his own way, takes the New Testament for what it claims to be: «testimony «10 to the transforming power of the Resurrection.

Thus, not only is group - interest an abstraction from the interests of concrete individuals, but such interest also has the tendency to accomplish the opposite of what it claims to do.

As soon as we confront any evidence, therefore, no matter what it claims to support, we know that it will support the truth that something endures.

In other words, Ogden's analysis of various descriptions of experience is informed by two distinctions, both of which apply to the noetic pole of experience: a twofold distinction between nonsensuous and sensory modes of experience and a threefold distinction of what Whitehead calls «the feeling of the ego, the others, the totality,» that is, of self, other, and whole (PP 84).8 This comprehensive hermeneutical grid then permits an explanation of what he claims is a «sense of ourselves and others as of transcendent worth,» as precisely an «awareness of ourselves and the world as of worth to God» (PP 86f) Y Ogden notes that such an evidently theistic explanation is not open to empirical or experiential confirmation on either of the two more restrictive descriptions which, as he observes, must either «refer the word God» to some merely creaturely reality or process of interaction, or else., must deny it all reference whatever by construing its meaning as wholly noncognitive,» if they seek experiential illustration for such a sense at all (PP 80) 10

No, you have to take a leap of faith that the Bible is what it claims to be, the word of God, after first taking the leap of faith that there actually is a God, which you would only have learned about from the Bible.

What if this «God» is not what he claims and is an insecure, delusional fallen spirit from another dimension, lying to us for the sake of reassuring him that he is almighty (kind of like Kim Jong Un and his father)?

I think we know there are scribal errors in this bible of ours (no doubt from me)-- but I am yet to find a scribal error that changes the character of Jesus from what he claims to be to someone altogether different (ie: not the son of David or from Nazareth or hates Gentiles, etc) or changes his teachings from one thing to another (ie: we don't catch him stoning someone in adultery anywhere or cursing the roman guards for crucifying him).

In the same vain, to say that GWB spoke «Christianity» (it was his writer that put that phrase in) made him «one of us Christian's is ludicrous — like the Pharisees, he doesn't know how to «walk the walk» and live what he claims to be is his Faith.

The agape of the Christian would not be what it claims to be if it remains hidden to the transparency of Greek eros.

This, though, is something different from suggesting that the Catholic Church presently lacks something she needs to be «fully what she claims to be.»

(Of course, if Jesus is not what he claims to be, the scribes are right.

Jesus died on a cross, he did nt say a mubling word to those who betrayed him, let this man hang on his own cross and be about what he claims to folllow.

Medardus, Hitler was not Christian, no matter what he claims.

It's based on a predisposition or paradigm that the Bible can't be what it claims to be.

It is quite a different matter with those who do not know — i.e., do not recognize the truth — that the Catholic Church is what she claims to be.

Who / what claims the first 3 days were 24 hours long?

If one has actually experienced God, as revealed through Jesus Christ and his Holy Spirit, then one has the evidence needed to have confidence that the bible is exactly what it claims to be: the revealed word of God.

Please quote me specifically what claims i made that you require proof for.

I take it for what it claims to be: the self - knowledge of our bodily event» (SMW 107).

Now, tell me: What claims did I just make?

What claims would these be?

Is what it claims true?).

To spend time to write something to help others get through what she claims doesn't excisit.

One may craft an elaborate theology and label it whatever one wants, but that does not make it what it claims to be.

In her editorial, Catherine Pepinster reproaches Pope Paul VI for what she claims are his assumptions in Humanae Vitae, but she is painfully unaware of her own.

Making unfounded claims of the supernatural, about «life after death», muddies the water, creates conflict, destroys what it claims to build.

The Bible is true, not so much because it is fact (which I believe to be true), but because it does what it claims to do, that is, change lives for the better.

The Evangelical Alliance (EA) has complained to the Advertising Standards Authority over what it claims is the «virtual disfigurement» of Rio de Janeiro's... More

Today the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life released what it claims to be the first quantitative worldwide study on how governments and societies infringe on the religious beliefs and practices of individuals.

To spend time to write something to help others get through what she claims doesn't excist.

So Huebert, if I understand you correctly you are saying that given a reliable subject with a genuine experience, there is no subjective way to determine that his observation and experience are anything other that what he claims.

IF he REALLY believed what he claims to believe, he would WISH to go be with his Jebus.

I defend the Book of Mormon because I have read it and know in my heart and mind it is exactly what it claims to be.

There is not the slightest shred of evidence for what he claims, and yet he is certain it is true.

Religion can prove none of what it claims, and if you disagree with them, you're going to hell.