Sentences with phrase «what common things»

• Starting with different age groups: 18 - 24 months, 24 - 36 months, 36 + months • Maintaining the learning process through to completion • Troubleshooting: what common things go wrong, and how to address them • Wrapping up the process to result in full potty independence.

They learn to ask what common things mean, why ordinary operations work.

Not exact matches

One of the first things Hillary Clinton decided to address in the «What Happened» chapter on why she lost the election was one of the most common critiques of her campaign: That she didn't put forth enough effort in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania.

Whether you recognize it or not, all successful small businesses — regardless of what they do or sell — have one thing in common: their owners know how to build and maintain relationships.

And what all three things have in common is that they're improvisatory.

What's the one thing they have in common aside from their desire to grow professionally?

She's seen startups at all stages - from seed stage to public, and knows a thing or two about what great companies have in common.

One of the things that entrepreneurs tend to have in common is an inflated sense of what their companies are worth.

What I tried to do was come up with common characters we face at work — like the «manterrupter» who interrupts you in a meeting, or the office mom who ends up taking on the mother lode of menial tasks — as well as some of the internal barriers, like the feeling of being an imposter, and then digging through the research to find out how you can push back against these things.

But, what are the common things that successful leaders do that we all can emulate?

Rich = not just financial, it's emotional, spiritual, health, etc. [6:01] Two skills for true wealth, first is the «Science of Achievement» [6:34] After talking to top investors, Tony found that everyone invests differently, but there are some things that everyone has in common: The Core Four [6:46] Same as health, everyone is unique, but there are fundamentals that if you violate the rules you're going to not have energy, get sick [7:23] Three fundamentals for achievement [7:32] What is something in your life today that once was a dream?

What's one thing every startup, small business, home - based business and mega-corporation has in common?

All of these bubbles and crashes have one thing in common: If you tracked them on a line graph, the sharp price gains people made day after day on the investment would form what's called a «parabolic curve» — one of the most reliable warning signs that an investment may be overheating amid hype and euphoria.

-LSB-...] Ben: «It's counterintuitive to assume that poor market performance is a good thing, but that's exactly what it can be for younger investors or those with many years to continue saving from their paychecks» (A Wealth Of Common Sense)-LSB-...]

Paul Graham points out that sometimes doing what does not scale is essential to enabling critical mass which does allow a business to scale: «One of the most common types of advice we give at Y Combinator is to do things that don't scale.

He also pointed out that even if what happened with Daniels was the sort of thing that was very common for Cohen as part of his duties, the Daniels scenario could still be a contribution if Cohen understood it would aid Trump's electoral effort.

What they don't appreciate is that this rate of evolution is all that is required to produce the diversity of all living things from a common ancestor.

If i was an atheist I would not worry about taking advantage of other people for my own benefit since I would have nothing to loose... Again I don't listen to what religious books say they all have been twisted, but some things are common sense.

Rather, a complex set of events constitutes what in common sense language would be called a person or a thing.

One thing that is common in EVERY SINGLE FORM: the abuser doesn't see anything wrong with what they have done.

Most of what they do have in common are simply things they both independently took over from Baden - Powell.

One of the most common things that many singles reported experiencing from the opposite sex is the unrealistic standard of what they're looking for in a relationship.

There was in some communities a practice of having all things in common, and there was practised for a time in some groups what Charles Williams has later called «an experiment in dissociation», the living together of men and women with a complete renunciation of sex.12 But these radical experiments never became normative for the churches.

My preconceptions about Christian diversity were shook to the core by some of the things many Christians denied and affirmed that did not match up with what I thought were common beliefs.

From other passages where Whitehead discusses the principle of relativity, we can safely infer that what all entities have in common — and thus what «entity», «being», «object», and «thing» connote in common — is their capacity to contribute determination to every actuality whose becoming finds those entities already existing (PR 366, 371, 392).

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

This type of act can happen regardless of what you believe... we all have one thing in common - we're all human.

«What is the most ancient thing — what the most beautiful — what the largest — what the wisest — what the most common — what the most useful — what the most hurtful — what the strongest — and what the most easy?&raWhat is the most ancient thing — what the most beautiful — what the largest — what the wisest — what the most common — what the most useful — what the most hurtful — what the strongest — and what the most easy?&rawhat the most beautiful — what the largest — what the wisest — what the most common — what the most useful — what the most hurtful — what the strongest — and what the most easy?&rawhat the largest — what the wisest — what the most common — what the most useful — what the most hurtful — what the strongest — and what the most easy?&rawhat the wisest — what the most common — what the most useful — what the most hurtful — what the strongest — and what the most easy?&rawhat the most common — what the most useful — what the most hurtful — what the strongest — and what the most easy?&rawhat the most useful — what the most hurtful — what the strongest — and what the most easy?&rawhat the most hurtful — what the strongest — and what the most easy?&rawhat the strongest — and what the most easy?&rawhat the most easy?»

It may be that the omission is due to circumstances which rob it of significance, yet the fact that the older sources in Samuel manifest the same oversight and that one goes on as far as the prophetic histories and then to the writing prophets for indubitable evidence of belief in a common ancestry strengthens the suspicion that things were not what later writers would have us believe.

I think what's beautiful is that sharing all things in common is not a prescription for community, but it's a description of what happened as the Holy Spirit fell on them.

Could it be, for example, that a kairos for suffering and hope does not preclude theological attention to other clarnant issues, not only as they bear upon this one, but also in their own right - sin as how we all stand accountable before God, death as our common mortality, error as our common lot - and what the Good News says about all these things, i.e., forgiveness, resurrection, revelation?

Regarding Scripture, I think what is vital for us today, as in all prior ages of God's saints — is the need to recognize these truths as «spirit and life» to us — to understand that God has indeed seen fit to speak through «common» things — written scripture, the communion, the «natural» majesty of creation and, ultimately, in the person of His Son — to reveal to us His character and purpose.

What he discovered as he got to know more gay people was this: «The one big thing the gays and the Christians had in common was that they both believed in a Gays - vs.

It does not matter if we say Gott in German or Deus in Latin, or El in the Semitic languages or teotl in Mexican and so forth, though it is, of course, a very obscure and difficult question how we can know that all these different words mean the same thing or person, for in this case we can not simply point to a common experience of what is meant, independent of the term.

Without reducing all religions to a quest for one common essence — which the pluralist position is often accused of doing — and without making the simplistic claim that all religions are saying or doing «the same thing,» it nevertheless seems that in their own widely divergent ways they all seek and express union with something like what we have been calling «mystery.»

what this boils down to is the hate in the world is at a all time high, we riot over videos and cartoon pictures, believe what u want but lets share one thing in common love and respect

Are they separate, or is there one thing called «onward thrust» manifested in all the different onward thrusts, and if so, what have the different onward thrusts in common?

What we get all worked up about is: «All who believed were together and had all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need.»

What stands between us and 3,000 believers «having all things in common»?

(If two things are similar, what identical quality do they have in common?

Despite the fear of being called communist, the reality is, that's what they did — they shared all things in common.

The one thing all Christian churches have in common is God and Christ and the everlasting arms, which is what he was talking about.

As time goes buy the kind defenders of free will over their rejection to «dead» here and colossians 2:13 tend to resort to a familiar defense, that of labeling it a Calvinist viewpoint and that its almost a cultist view point to hold.Very sad yet very much the defense of many christians.Dead may i suggest is dead, the inability to respond, does not mean that prior to being saved one could not read scripture but because of this spiritual deadness its not profitabel / meaningful - we just can not continue to revise the meaning of dead to fit a view point - because natural man has not been born again this deadness (spiritually) shows itself as «none seek after God», in this condition they are» slaves to sin» and the spiritual things of God (the bible) is «folly / foolishness» even the gospel is judged by natural man as «folly / foolishness «(1 cor.1: 18) Please stop with this weak / common defense called Calvinism - many believers are truly turned off by such a defense.We must not forget the man's «free will» is what took the whole human race down in the garden; i would hope we can rise above our love affair with the human will.

If, indeed, we may not immediately and directly agree on the positive meaning of freedom, peace and justice, we all share a long - standing and common experience of what these things are not.

May the son and brother, being born of one common - placed man named Joseph and mother named Mary, be never - no - more to be found unwilling to set things right no matter what was so done in time's long ago passing momentums!

The very same thing happens in many churches that are gathered around shared beliefs, a common mission, or what it produces.

It withdraws protection from the weak and vulnerable, allowing the strong to define the status and rights of the weak; it privatizes matters which, in any legitimate political order, must be public in nature; it sets innumerable roadblocks to the rectification of the problem through mutual deliberation of citizens in legislative assemblies; and it has made what used to be its most loyal citizens — religious believers — enemies of the common good whenever their convictions touch upon public things.

And herein, in the fact that the relation is spirit, is the self, consists the responsibility under which all despair lies, and so lies every instant it exists, however much and however ingeniously the despairer, deceiving himself and others, may talk of his despair as a misfortune which has befallen him, with a confusion of things different, as in the case of vertigo aforementioned, with which, though it is qualitatively different, despair has much in common, since vertigo is under the rubric soul what despair is under the rubric spirit, and is pregnant with analogies to despair.

Precisely because it is a theological school, it will be helpful to ask three different sorts of questions about it, and then to ask how the answers to the three are themselves interrelated in the structures that pattern the school's common life: What construal or construals of the Christian thing are assumed in the way the subjects of study are addressed?

«To speak unqualifiedly of «our common love for God,» as if the Quran's Allah and the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ are one and the same, and as if what it means to «love God» in these two faiths means the same thing, is to say more than I am willing to grant,» he said.