Not exact matches
Hulu's close ties to
content providers like Disney, Fox, Time Warner, and Comcast could give the streaming service a leg up in
what is shaping up to be a competitive field.
One caveat, however: Net neutrality, which simply means that ISPs are required to treat all
content equally, regardless of
what it is, and they can't give preference to some digital
content providers over others, including yours.
Dish hasn't been shy about using its new muscle against other
content providers either: It has taken recent disputes with both CBS (cbs) and 21st Century Fox (fox) to the point where both removed their channels from the network, but ultimately signed new agreements at
what Dish felt were more favorable rates.
What we're really talking about with IP - specific advertising is geo - targeting: the method of determining the geolocation of a website visitor and delivering different
content to that visitor based on his or her current location, such as country, region or state, city, or metro code or zip code; organization; IP address; internet service
provider (ISP) or other criteria.
Perhaps even more worrisome for cable
providers are services like HBO Now, which deliver
what had been exclusive cable
content directly to subscribers, and whose growth is also accelerating.
Pai's proposal marks a victory for big internet service
providers such as AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc that opposed the rules and gives them sweeping powers to decide
what web
content consumers can get.
Content providers still wrestle with
what to put online, however.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump, proposed in April to scrap the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules, moving to give broadband service
providers sweeping power over
what content consumers can access.
Pai, a Republican named by President Donald Trump to head up the FCC, unveiled plans last week to scrap the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules, moving to give broadband service
providers sweeping power over
what content consumers can access.
Republicans said the internet will operate essentially the same without
what they see as heavy - handed government rules, while Democrats said the repeal will allow internet
providers to change how people access
content.
They haven't been allowed to though, because of regulations protecting «net neutrality»: the fundamental principle that all
content on the web should be treated the same by Internet service
providers (ISPs), no matter
what kind of data it is.
Trust, relevance and interest are
what attract readers to
content, which then, quite naturally, introduces them to the products
content providers sell.
As you craft your mission, CMI founder Joe Pulizzi recommends all
content marketers ask themselves, «In
what subject area can we become the leading informational
provider?»
There's no love lost between Netflix (s NFLX) Chief
Content Officer Ted Sarandos and Canada's big Internet
providers: «It's almost a human rights violation
what they're charging for internet access in Canada,» Sarandos said during the Merrill Lynch Media, Communications & Entertainment conference in Los Angeles Wednesday.
Regulations also require Rogers to make its 4K
content available to other TV
providers, but
what will it charge them?
And with the lack of commentking by our members (following the lead of the less than enthused and barely present
content providers), we have
what we have right now.
At the same time, I am concerned that, in recent years, some network
providers have sought to limit or curtail the
content of
what viewers can access over their networks.
In 2010, the Federal Communications Commission adopted a set of sensible rules to preserve the open Internet by limiting the ability of broadband
providers to act as Internet gatekeepers and decide
what content their subscribers can access.
She fears a two - sided market would basically give broadband
providers control over
what Internet
content people can access by favoring the biggest or favored services.
Their goal is to inform the global EM community with timely and high yield
content about
what providers like you are seeing and doing everyday in your local ED.
He said: «The diversity of
providers gives schools and colleges important choices - choice about
what subjects they can offer; choice about
content and delivery; and choice about ongoing support and customer service.
«As course and
content development platforms adopt the specification, as learning record stores come online and as LMS
providers offer LRS support, xAPI will emerge into
what I call a «geek - free zone» in much the same way (as) SCORM.
Join us for a conversation with the chief academic officers of the Broward County, Fla., and Cleveland, Ohio, school districts to better understand
what schools really need and want from digital
content providers.
If
content providers have more incentive to develop better products,
what's wrong with that?
How will
content providers be able to track who is downloading
what from where?
I.e., Kindle actually is
what ignorant critics have claimed regarding the iPod: a device designed to lock you in to a single
provider of both hardware and digital
content.
Again,
what would the ebook marketplace look like if, in addition to libraries,
content providers were equally committed to a sustainable ecosystem for all players?
What does an ebooks marketplace look like if, in addition to libraries,
content providers are equally committed to a sustainable ecosystem that enables viability for all players — publishers, vendors, authors, libraries and, of course, readers?
What this essentially means is you won't find YouTube, Google Drive, Google Maps or even Google Music, instead Amazon is hoping you'll commit to their own
content providers.
Macmillan, the
content provider, is allowed to tell Amazon
what price it should set Macmillan ebooks.
Samsung have also partnered with
content providers through
what they call Galaxy Gifts, so we are offered things like one - year free of Gogo In - flight Wi - Fi access, a 12 - month subscription to Bloomberg BusinessWeek, a 6 - month trial subscription to The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post, 3 - month subscription to The New York Times, 3 months free Sirius XM Radio, and 3 months free subscription to Audible, in addition to all the other things we get bundled in with a Samsung tablet.
Professional essay service
providers such as EWritingService.com know the process and understand
what steps should be taken to complete original custom
content.
What's also very important is that both Kobo and Barnes & Noble are open to proven
content providers like Smashwords.
(The use of PDF may increase the risk of piracy, since files are easier to share, but it's also a clever way to get around some device
providers» more restrictive rules about
what content is allowed through their proprietary stores.
Despite the accusation of being associated with digital theft online, BitTorrent seems to stick
what they do best to complement the peer - to - peer relationship between
content providers and audience.
Regardless of how many useful sources are publicly available online,
what's important for authors as
content providers is to collect and analyze their data regularly and pragmatically.
In essence, they need to build their relationship with local
content providers who know
what their consumers want.
Sorry if this doesn't add directly to the discussion but when Liza wrote «I also hope to see an ePub style guide from Apple to help publishers and designers understand more fully
what is and isn't supported in iBooks» I wasn't surprised, there doesn't seem to be any guides for
content providers at all.
I agree that
content providers and distributors need to start thinking about
what people want out of their experience (all things you mentioned), not
what is necessarily easiest to provide.
I think
what's most frightening about this situation — and, indeed, the situation a year or so ago when Amazon ripped an Orwell novel off a high school student's Kindle — is the
content provider's ability to infiltrate someone's personally owned hardware to lock or retrieve licensed
content.
As long as the wholesale pricing actually is wholesale pricingâ $» as in, the retailers are paying publishers a specific amount per e-book sold no matter
what the retailer price isâ $» I have no problem with wholesaler pricing. I actually prefer its precedent to agency pricing, but I fear that the wholesale pricing scheme would end up modified if forced upon retailers, with retailers only paying
content providers a percentage of whatever retail price the retailers choose.
At
what point does a blog transition from an «interactive
content provider» to an «interactive computer service»?
It's not the totally open DRMless world that the Free Software Foundation would envision us living in, but at least until the e-book market is mature enough that
content providers can be comfortable to live without DRM — similar to
what's gradually happened with digital music.
Yahoo Finance finally decided to cleanse the shire, and tossed out
what I felt were a number of subpar
content providers.
What annoys me is persistent / begging article writers or
content providers who I have politely declined.
When you search for a company that can help you with your papers, you will find
what seems to be an endless list of
content providers.
What it all boils down to is that the
providers who figure out how to differentiate their brand and sell quality
content online will win in the CLE 2.0 era.
What I'd like to know is, can rental stores transition to being digital
content providers by uploading videos from the physical copies they already own for rental?
ACC believes that many traditional law firm business models and many of the approaches to lawyer training and cost management are not aligned with
what corporate clients want and need: value - driven, high - quality legal services that deliver solutions for a reasonable cost and develop lawyers as counselors (not just
content -
providers), advocates (not just process - doers) and professional partners.
«
What we need,» he writes, «is a Digital Bill of Rights that spells out what freedoms and rights consumers can expect from Internet service providers, content companies, device manufacturers, and the government itself.&ra
What we need,» he writes, «is a Digital Bill of Rights that spells out
what freedoms and rights consumers can expect from Internet service providers, content companies, device manufacturers, and the government itself.&ra
what freedoms and rights consumers can expect from Internet service
providers,
content companies, device manufacturers, and the government itself.»