Sentences with phrase «what counter arguments»

In my opinion what has happened in this area is that a kind of social ideology is now embedded within the medical paradigm, to the extent that that social judgments are masquerading as scientific judgments making the science a pseudo science, as a relatively small number of people have been placed in a position wherein they can choose what relevant lines of evidence (and what counter arguments) are acceptable and which are not, as deemed by themselves.
See here for what this counter argument really is: http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html

Not exact matches

If you actually had any valid counter arguments to what I'm saying you would offer them.
Thus the «incarnational» counter to contemporary Gnosticism and its ideology of «you are what you say you are» (irrespective, for example, of biology) will be less an argument than a demonstration: living in concord with the moral truths built into the world and into us, which lead to beatitude or happiness.
Stronger than every obstacle and counterargument is the instinct which tells us that, to be faithful to Life, we must know; we must know more and still more; we must tirelessly and unceasingly search for Something, we know not what, which will appear in the end to those who have penetrated to the very heart of reality.
Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
Whatever layers of meaning you want to try and work into the meaphor of the cup... what Jesus was asking was something He knew may not be part of the will of the Father, which is counter to your argument, since Jesus drinking deeply of the cup would exactly be the will of the Father for all the reasons you mention.
Instead, if you disagree with what he said, you should carefully and exegetically counter his arguments while commending him for his loving intentions.
It is an obvious and extreme example of just what I am talking about; an ignorant straw man and false premise on which you base your counter argument.
I won't go into the fact that no - one knew who he was before he joined us, and all the tired old arguments about what he has done for us, are countered in my book by what we have done for him and his bulging pockets.
Yeh i know what you mean, would prefer them to give a counter argument seeing as they obviously disagree.
Questions during the Q&A portion of the press conference included his plans during his scheduled visit to Albany on March 4th, why he expects to convince legislators who he has not convinced, whether he's concerned that the middle school program will be pushed aside if there is a pre-K funding mechanism other than his proposed tax, where the money to fund the middle school program will come from, how he counters the argument that his tax proposal is unfair to cities that do not have a high earner tax base, how he will measure the success of the program absent additional standardized testing, whether he expects to meet with Governor Cuomo or Senate Republican Leader Dean Skelos during his March 4th trip, what he would say to a parent whose child planned on attending one of the charter schools that his administration refused to allow, whether he doubts Governor Cuomo's commitment or ability to deliver on the funding the governor has promised, what are the major hurdles in trying to convince the state senate to approve his tax proposal, whether there's an absolute deadline for getting his tax proposal approved, whether he can promise parents pre-K spots should Governor Cuomo's proposal gointo effect, and why he has not met with Congressman Michael Grimm since taking office.
I would guess that many households more than likely won't take the time / energy to seek out a counter argument to what they have fed to them.
-- This is really just the bar of gold (counter --RRB- argument in disguise: A bar of gold has no yield — so what's its intrinsic value, who knows how high / low it might trade, maybe it's even ultimately worthless?!
How ever I also do think your going in the right direction with your investing skills, because as a counter argument using the same info as above, i can also conclude you're moving in the «right» direction and show improvements in what you want to achieve.
But then you could also counter this argument by saying this is deliberate, acting as a commentary on life itself and how everything we do in this government controlled world is entirely within the confines of what is deemed acceptable and normal, and that ultimately the Stanley Parable is mirroring the fact that we have little choice and are largely not in control of our own lives, hence Stanley, the most decidedly average person there is who goes through the same motions every day, for no other reason than because he is told to.
This isn't a counter argument — but I always wonder at what rate male artists get resold / flipped compared to female artists.
To sound a note of caution, however, stand by for the counter argument to shift to what scientists were «predicting» in the 1950s and early 1960s.
While fighting a war of arguments how climate works, or may change, and what counter measures should be taken at many Billions costs, the global politics, and scientific community feel comfortable to talk about CLIMATE.
It's what is advised by debate team coaches when they know the counter arguments can not succeed on their own merit.
I know you read it, what argument can you muster to counter hers?
It is not enough for proponents of climate change policies to simply make counter scientific and economic «factual» arguments to the scientific and economic claims of the climate change policy opponents, advocates for climate policies need to help citizens understand what interests are responsible for the disinformation that is the basis for the false arguments made by opponents of climate change policies, why the tactics used the opponents of climate change policies are morally reprehensible, and why the arguments of those opposing climate change policies will continue to create huge injustices and immense suffering in the world.
He «sounds informed and the point is true» because he copies from other places that are «informed» but his copying «in no way does it counter the argument presented» because he lacks understanding of both «the argument presented» and what he copies.
If the counter argument is that these changes are a response to Global Warming - it would be really good to see a graph showing what the models predicted / hindcast on average for the global cloud cover.
The counter argument is, so what if stuff is a little bit bigger than is conceivably possible?
They also rejected Network Rail's counter argument that the system of amalgamating rest breaks was better from a health and safety perspective, as the length of at least 20 minutes uninterrupted rest is crucial and it is not open to employers to decide what health and safety requires.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z