How would he know
what damage costs would be without actually repairing, since repair cost estimates would be just that, estimates.
Not exact matches
While the judge referred the question of
damages to another hearing, he did grant Mars Canada $ 225,000 in legal
costs for
what he deemed the brazen breach of the earlier settlements and for Ebert's attempts to «avoid accountability» for the misconduct.
It Starts with a Buzz The University of Life Service, Service, Service
What Business Should You Be In When is the right time to Start a business Don't Be a Flake Get It Right from the Start - Build Your Business like an Egyptian Pyramid My First Business Venture How I Started My Business Where It Went Wrong Making a Mistake Don't Burn Your Bridges
Damage Limitation and Control How I Moved On Controlling Your Financial Exposure Getting Help with Your Idea How do You Research Your Idea Why You Have a Business Always Be Prepared Vertical or Horizontal Vision
What Direction to Follow Leadership and Employing Staff Guiding Your Management Team Enjoy Your Work and Your Life Get Your Products and Services Right Low
Cost Products and Service is not the Way Ahead Do You Need a Business Partner Business Expansion If You Want to Diversify, of
What Should You Be Aware More Examples of Business Expansion The Importance of Good Time Keeping Time Management Real Estate Investment Finding the Solution
The amount of federal money will largely be determined by FEMA and state teams that will go into the field, survey the
damage, and write reports about
what needs to be fixed and how much it may
cost to fix it.
He was into something and I rem the City game at the Emirates where he bossed and we should have won, but again his self inflicting
damages is
what will
cost him and on a greater extent the team...
This is just the most extreme example of
what can go wrong and how extensive the
damages and
costs can be when considering home birth and using CPMs.
«Many of these incidents aren't that expensive, it's the labor
costs of cleanup and fixing
what's been
damaged,» Scarmardo said.
«Our challenge is to expose relentlessly
what this
cost is, to show how the decision was based on imperfect knowledge which will now become informed knowledge, to calculate in «easy to understand» ways how proceeding will cause real
damage to our country; and to build support for finding a way out from the present rush over the cliff's edge.
The people of Oneida County are grateful for all of the assistance in paying for the
cost of the
damage, but
what we need the most right now is long - term leadership so that steps can be taken to avoid a reoccurrence of this situation in the future.
«Once I have the full set of numbers, the full
damage costs and I know
what I'm going to get back from the federal government than I can tell you the full
costs to the state,» he said.
Michael Fabricant: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for each of the demonstrations about Gaza and Israel held since 1 January 2009, how many police were injured;
what damage to police vehicles took place; and
what the
cost of policing was; and if she will make a statement.
«I'm pleased that the Federal Claims Court has found
what Missouri families, farmers, and business owners have been saying for more than a decade: The Army Corps of Engineers» mismanagement of the Missouri River has resulted in widespread
damages with substantial
costs,» Blunt said in a statement.
«We have a choice when issuing earthquake warnings,» says study leader Sarah Minson, a seismologist at the U.S. Geological Survey, or USGS, in Menlo Park, Calif. «You have to think about your relative risk appetite:
What is the
cost of taking action versus the
cost of the
damage you're trying to prevent?»
While the Trump administration has said it will take weeks to complete a comprehensive
damage assessment for Puerto Rico, early estimates suggest that an effective response for the commonwealth and the U.S. Virgin Islands would be on par with
what it will
cost to rebuild from Hurricanes Harvey and Irma.
What Caught Our Attention: Regular readers will be familiar with the saga involving Fazlul Sarkar and PubPeer: In 2014, Sarkar sued anonymous commenters on the site, claiming defamation (and that
damaging comments may have
cost him a new job).
So
what you're saying is even if they're responsible for
damaging the car in some way as a result of repair work they did initially, it'll
cost me money to get anything fixed?
Then approach the garage telling them
what the engine
damage is and
what repair / replacement
costs will be, plus any personal losses and inconvenience.
I hit a fence and the drivers side front fender is
damaged beyond repair
what would the
cost of a new fender and installation of the fender
cost me?
These «fender benders» end up
costing car owners a lot of money and aggravation because the bumpers on many cars aren't designed to handle
what should be a no -
damage event.
The parties have been unable to agree upon any of the matters of substance, in particular on the form of and territorial extent of any injunctive relief, upon the extent of any Island Records v Tring disclosure (relevant to the election of an inquiry as to
damages or an account of profits), upon whether and if so in
what form there should be an order for publicity of the judgment as an enforcement measure, upon the appropriate basis and order as to
costs, upon whether the Claimants»
costs should be reduced by reason of the fact that for a period an exclusive licence was not registered, upon the extent of any CPR 31.22 order in relation to alleged confidential information, upon whether there should be permission to appeal and upon whether there should be a stay pending any appeal.»
The
cost of their deductible (most are roughly $ 500 or $ 1,000) would be a small price to pay to repair or replace
what could be tens of thousands of dollars in
damages and the instruments would be included in that.
Since the recovered property is used and / or
damaged, and you were paid the replacement
cost, the insurance company isn't able to unjustly enrich themselves by selling or salvaging it — they'd never sell it for
what they paid you, so they won't come out ahead.
Contents Replacement
Cost: When your insurance company pays you for a damaged item, it typically pays you a depreciated cost, meaning that what you receive is less than you paid for the i
Cost: When your insurance company pays you for a
damaged item, it typically pays you a depreciated
cost, meaning that what you receive is less than you paid for the i
cost, meaning that
what you receive is less than you paid for the item.
«People often fail to realize that the insurance doesn't cover the market value of the condo but
what it
costs to replace lost items and repair interior
damage,» Giulanti says.
On the other hand, your renters insurance policy can pay you replacement
cost so you can go buy things to replace
what's
damaged.
But
what if your liability coverage is not enough to cover the
cost of
damages or litigation?
You know
what deductibles look like on commercial insurance — if the
damage truly is minor, repairs combined with the hotel
costs might not even reach that deductible.
Protect against depreciation and betterment with replacement
cost coverage — this gives you the money you need to replace
what's
damaged versus
what it's worth.
So - called «guaranteed replacement
cost» policies cover the
cost of rebuilding your home when it gets
damaged, no matter
what the amount — even if the insurance company underestimated how expensive it would be.
Whether or not the seller suing is a real risk and
what damages it would be for is a bit up in the air - since the seller hasn't been living in the house for a while, from
what I know, I doubt there are severe
costs /
damages the seller would sue for.
What's more, this valuable property is often not adequately covered under the theft victim's homeowners or renters insurance, leaving huge out - of - pocket
costs for replacing an item that is stolen, lost, or
damaged.
Depending on the extent of the vulnerabilities, homeowners can make an educated decision before they purchase the home as to
what it will
cost to remediate the
damage.
With a replacement
cost policy, your insurer will provide coverage — up to your policy's limits — equal to
what it would take to replace your lost goods or repair your
damaged home in today's dollars.
In every case we learn the same lesson, over and over: the
cost of reacting to a climate disaster — in terms of lives lost, business disruption, and rebuilding — is far in excess of
what the
cost would be of proactively taking climate considerations into account as we make decisions and accordingly mitigating potential future
damage and destruction.
But
what about the enormous financial
cost of raising generations of humans
damaged by toxic pollutants, not to mention the emotional / psychological burden?
We know
what the
costs were: the lives of more than 30 000 people, most of them Iraqi civilians; cultural
damages; a great increase in mistrust of, and hatred for, the West; and many millions of tax dollars that would have been much better spent on education, health and combating global warming.
In addition to the issues Rob raised regarding causation, point 4 of the consensus statement as articulated on RealClimate implies a
cost benefit analysis, and requires an assessment of
what level of harm /
damage is unacceptable, and an assessment of the
cost and likelihood of avoiding it.
You also need to show
what are the economic
costs (or the
damage costs to human - wellbeing) if you raise the
cost of energy.
The onus is clearly on the alarmists, if they want to argue for high
cost mitigation policies, to demonstrate
what is the
damage cost of warming.
What greater crime can there be than to dishonestly support coal and disparage renewables at the
cost of severe
damage to the planet and the quality of life of all future generations?
Why would you not add to the
cost of
what filing cabinets of global warming alarmism pseudo-science, all of the dollars that are funneled to the Mideast and folks like Hugo and all of the foregone oppoutunities here at home, not to mention the
damage to the culture and the toll it has taken on scientific integrity?
«We've got to get much more aggressive in this fight against climate change, because we know
what we put off today will only make the
cost and the
damage greater for our children tomorrow.»
However, with
what I believe are justifiable input values for ECS,
damage function, discount rate, emissions rates, participation rates, the
costs would greatly exceed benefits for many centuries, probably forever.
Existing estimates are based not on testable (let alone tested) economic models of how changes in climate generate economic
costs, but on conjecture, guesswork, and sometimes simply by asking «experts» — the people who construct SCC estimates —
what they think the
damages from climate change might be.»
What is even more important than the fact that
damage cost increases with climate sensitivity is to ascertain the functional form of that increase: Will a.5 °C increase of sensitivity from 2.5 °C to 3 °C incur the same additional
cost as an increase from 3 °C to 3.5 °C?
As recently as last December she said: «If we don't succeed in limiting global warming to 2 degrees, then the
costs of the resulting
damages will be many times higher than
what we now, with a change in our lifestyle, can achieve.»
This was EXACTLY the major point I was making earlier about trying to assing a x %
cost of Katrina's
damage to AGW and
what the 55vs65vs70mph driving analogy was trying to demonstrate!
related events that have happened in the past and firstly ask
what is
cost effective adaptation to prevent / minimise the
damage done should such an event occur again?
What can seem like a fair sum might fail to cover long - term medical
costs, lost wages from missed work due to an accident, or delayed injuries or
damages that weren't accounted for in the original settlement amount, we're experts at navigating the often confusing legal and insurance process.
We strive to help clients understand
what happened and obtain any
damages they are owed to offset the increased
costs of caring for a child with disabilities.