Sentences with phrase «what death and resurrection»

Not exact matches

------ My Quote for you was the verse 2:214 explaining that we are passing a test of good and bad, what was our choice we will be rewarded for it... ------ my own words are of my own Holy Book... and what I do is out of my Iman in the words of this book and my Iman that by what am doing is «All in support of God and his messengers» may I by that deserve the mercy of God before death, after death and on resurrection, judgment date...!?

What all religions do in general and what Christianity does to perfection is to keep people ignorant, keep people scared (after death punishments) and keep them brainwashed (Virgin birth, resurrection eWhat all religions do in general and what Christianity does to perfection is to keep people ignorant, keep people scared (after death punishments) and keep them brainwashed (Virgin birth, resurrection ewhat Christianity does to perfection is to keep people ignorant, keep people scared (after death punishments) and keep them brainwashed (Virgin birth, resurrection etc).

Through them all we learn finally what Sukhanov thinks must be the meaning of his life: «And it was only after twenty - three years of mute crawling through the mud» only after he had felt the smooth taste of betrayal on his lips and the chilly weight of thirty pieces of silver in his sweaty palm, only after he had learned about the slow fattening of the soul, the anguish of wasted chances, the pain of love slipping away, the soft, horrifying slide into death» yes, it was only then that the elixir of life was granted to him and his resurrection assured.&raqAnd it was only after twenty - three years of mute crawling through the mud» only after he had felt the smooth taste of betrayal on his lips and the chilly weight of thirty pieces of silver in his sweaty palm, only after he had learned about the slow fattening of the soul, the anguish of wasted chances, the pain of love slipping away, the soft, horrifying slide into death» yes, it was only then that the elixir of life was granted to him and his resurrection assured.&raqand the chilly weight of thirty pieces of silver in his sweaty palm, only after he had learned about the slow fattening of the soul, the anguish of wasted chances, the pain of love slipping away, the soft, horrifying slide into death» yes, it was only then that the elixir of life was granted to him and his resurrection assured.&raqand his resurrection assured.»

What resulted on that day in Turin in 2010 was a deeply pastoral account of Christ's death and Resurrection, which explored some of the same central messages that he recently revisited in the last days of his papacy.

When these travelers heard what was being said in their own language, they wondered what was going on, and so Peter tells them all about Jesus, His death and resurrection, and how He is the promised Messiah of Israel (Acts 2:14 - 36).

Assumed, there would be no baptism, on could claim: «What has Christ's death and resurrection to do with me!»

The death and resurrection of Jesus are not only central to Scripture and the Gospel, but are also central to learning (maybe for the first time) what God is like, and how we are supposed to live our lives as followers of Jesus.

Taking Jesus death and resurrection as figurative as opposed to literal can have dire consequences on how we understand what God did for us as humanity.

It doesn't tell me what to teach my kid about death and resurrection, but it gives me some meaningful, age - appropriate ideas for how to celebrate Easter.

I learned this not from a class in feminist studies, but from Jesus — who was brought into the world by a woman whose obedience changed everything; who revealed his identity to a scorned woman at a well; who defended Mary of Bethany as his true disciple, even though women were prohibited from studying under rabbis at the time; who obeyed his mother; who refused to condemn the woman caught in adultery to death; who looked to women for financial and moral support, even after the male disciples abandoned him; who said of the woman who anointed his feet with perfume that «wherever this gospel is preached throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her»; who bantered with a Syrophoenician woman, talked theology with a Samaritan woman, and healed a bleeding woman; who appeared first before women after his resurrection, despite the fact that their culture deemed them unreliable witnesses; who charged Mary Magdalene with the great responsibility of announcing the start of a new creation, of becoming the Apostle to the Apostles.

The death and resurrection of Jesus are definitely part of what we share in evangelism, but we tell them these things to convince and persuade them to believe in Jesus for eternal life, not because they get eternal life by believing in the death and resurrection of Jesus.

First, people who argue that we must obey the Mosaic Law do not understand what Jesus Christ accomplished in His life, death, and resurrection, do not understand the Gospel of grace, and do not understand the difference between Israel and the Church.

Instead, it is Christ who by His death and resurrection supplies what we can not.

If a person must believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus, what was the object of faith for OT people and the apostles who did not (as far as we can tell) believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus?

What passages are there in Scripture which teach that a person must believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus in order to receive everlasting life?

The Bible considers ALL Christians to be saints... not just a select few... Peter called all the followers saints in letter to the churches in Asia minor... Paul refers to all Christians as well to be saints... not because of what we do... but because of who we are... we are set aside by God... thru Jesus death and resurrection... those of us who have acceptd this are saints...

If you want to be delivered from the devastating and destructive consequences of sin (see Sin), then you need to follow the ways, teachings, examples, and instructions of Jesus, and especially what He showed us through His death, burial, and resurrection.

When we come to his death and resurrection, it matters what it was that brought him there, what he tried to teach and tell and show.

What people normally seem to mean when they talk of the Mass as a re-presentation or re-actualization of the Paschal mystery is that it is a re-presentation or re-actualization of Christ's death and resurrection.

The gospel is a wide - ranging message about what God has done for the entire world through the life, teachings, crucifixion, death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Jesus probably foresaw his own death; but I think it is almost certain that the passages in the Gospels which speak of this, and which in some instances go on to say that he prophesied his resurrection, have been written up and embroidered in the light of what actually happened at Easter.

But what is special about the death and resurrection if we don't know about Jesus being God, or about God being holy, or about our own sinfulness, or about death being the penalty for sin... and on and on it goes.

For each year Lent and Easter are, once again, the rediscovery and the recovery by us of what we were made through our own baptismal death and resurrection.

The writers insisted that God's Word is about something and what it is most immediately about is a historical event: the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus and the inbreaking of the kingdom he inaugurates.

But through all of His teachings and miracles, and climaxing in His death and resurrection, Jesus was trying to show people what God was really like, and how the Kingdom of Heaven truly operated.

Such views, however, not only invariably devalue the terrestrial, but what's worse is that in their very devaluation they fail to apprehend the magnitude and universal scope of God's redemptive and re-creative work in the incarnation, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, a truly cosmic work to which Scripture bears testimony.

More often than we're comfortable admitting, I think, we find ourselves feeling what many recent theologians say we should: a twinge of uneasiness at speaking of heaven outside of church; the sense that Jesus» death and resurrection can't quite be brought to bear on our daily routine, our social life, our moneymaking, our recreation; an inability to see with the heart the goodness of the Good News; a certain emptiness in our prayers.

He is trying to force us to recognize that in spite of what appears to be orthodox christological affirmations, we are embedded in social practices that deny that Jesus's life, death and resurrection make any difference.

The resurrection of Christ is a way of affirming that God has received into his own life all that the historical event, designated when we say «Jesus Christ», has included: — his human existence as teacher and prophet, as crucified man upon his cross, in continuing relationship of others with him after that death, and also what has happened as a consequence of his presence and activity in the world.

If the fashion in which the basic New Testament proclamation has been interpreted in the preceding chapter has validity, then talk of the resurrection of Christ is a way of affirming that God has received into his own life all that the historical event, designated when we say «Jesus Christ», has included: his human existence as teacher and prophet, as crucified man upon his cross, in continuing relationship of others with him after that death, and along with this what has happened in consequence of his presence and activity in the world.

After going into some of the theories of how the evidence about Jesus could have been «tampered» with along the way, he then shows how each theory does not have the evidence to support it, and in the following chapters, goes «link by link» through the chain of custody to show how the Gospel records we have today are an accurate reflection of what was originally written down, and are also an accurate account of what actually happened during the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

It is true that both the gospels and the speeches of Peter and Paul in Acts give important testimony as to what the apostles taught about the Christian life and proclaimed about the meaning of Jesus» own life, death, and resurrection; yet both the gospels and Acts were written, not by apostles, but by later disciples, and their evidence on particular points stands in need of confirmation, if possible, from the apostles themselves.

Out of the experience of renewed trust aroused by Jesus» life, death, and resurrection was born what has come to be known as the ecclesia.

More often than we're comfortable admitting, I think, we find ourselves feeling what many recent theologians say we should: a twinge of uneasiness at speaking of heaven outside of church; the sense that Jesus» death and resurrection can't quite be brought to bear on our daily routine, our social life, our moneymaking, our recreation; an...

It is to ask oneself, «What difference does the death and resurrection of Christ make for how I understand this part of the Old Testament?»

This is what Jesus proclaimed through His life, death, and resurrection.

«A Christian understanding of the Old Testament should begin with what God revealed to the apostles and what they model for us: the centrality of the death and resurrection of Christ for Old Testament interpretation.

A more faithful question needs to be asked, even if it can not be reduced to an acronymn: «What does Jesus Christ, because of his unique life and death and resurrection, uniquely enable his disciples to do?»

It is not something we do, but what Jesus does in us through His death on the cross and His resurrection from the tomb, triumphant over death.

The death and Resurrection of Our Lord is what gives all death and life its meaning.

What does it mean, practically, to preserve and celebrate (as much as we can) the original intent of the authors of the Old Testament while still asking ourselves, «what difference does the death and resurrection of Christ make for how I understand this part of the Old Testament&raqWhat does it mean, practically, to preserve and celebrate (as much as we can) the original intent of the authors of the Old Testament while still asking ourselves, «what difference does the death and resurrection of Christ make for how I understand this part of the Old Testament&raqwhat difference does the death and resurrection of Christ make for how I understand this part of the Old Testament»?

But religion is a man - made system that tends to go against the flow of what the Lord Jesus brought to life through His death and resurrection.

Could it be, for example, that a kairos for suffering and hope does not preclude theological attention to other clarnant issues, not only as they bear upon this one, but also in their own right - sin as how we all stand accountable before God, death as our common mortality, error as our common lot - and what the Good News says about all these things, i.e., forgiveness, resurrection, revelation?

Sorry to tell ya, but the Jews succeded in the death of Jesus... what I don't understand is your use of that as a basis for hating Jews... You reveal your complete ignorance fo salvation... such as without the death and resurrection of Jesus -LCB- which ceretainly did happen as I am this day a witness of his resurrection -RCB-, there woudl be no asis for the gentiles for salvation... you see his blood was shed for the atoning sacrifice for the sins of all the world not just gentile but Jew as well..

Now, for the time that intervenes between man's death and the final resurrection, there is a secret shelter for his soul, as each is worthy of rest or affliction according to what it has merited while it lived in the body.

What makes me as well as God angry about, is so - called Christian people, that act like Jesus death burial and resurrection meant NOTHING!

Paul explains what baptism is: when we are baptized we are baptized into the likeness of Christ's death on the cross, burial in the tomb, and resurrection on the third day.

The fall of Adam and Eve, the covenants with Israel and its deliverance from bondage, its falling away and punishment through new sufferings, the speaking of the divine word through the prophets, the birth of Christ in human flesh, the life and death of Jesus, the experience of the resurrection, and the history of the Church, the expectation of the final events and the established reign of God in love and peace — all this is the Biblical understanding of what God has done, is doing, and will continue to do for the judgment and redemption of the world.

Eschatology, what will happen in the future, is rooted in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Hope, insofar as it is hope of resurrection, is the living contradiction of what it proceeds from and what is placed under the sign of the Cross and death.