Besides, people have claimed to know
what their diety wants, but in truth, no matter the diety that you worship, they are so far above us, that we have no chance to fully understand what or why they do.
Not exact matches
Zeus on the other hand has been proven real, he said so himself and he said everyone, all the other gods in other cultures are fakes...» = > upon
what are you basing your positive belief (you slipped up there in acknowledging atheism requires a positive disbelief in a
diety
Honestly, the * last * thing I want to be doing when I'm experiencing
what will be the last waking, conscious moments of life, is being worried that I didn't worship some imagined
diety enough to buy me a ticket to some la - la land in the clouds.
If we had been left without
dieties we would have never progressed past our base animal instincts and our world would not be
what it is now.
You need to first define and demonstrate
what you call «spirit» then define and demonstrate that your god exists, then demonstrate that your definition of spirit requires your
diety.
The difference here of course has nothing to do with trustung
what «men» have written, it has to do with faith in whatever
diety you believe... If you accept that there is a
diety responsible for inspiring someone to write about them then really it is not the person writing but the
diety writing through them... so your argument from that perspective is moot...
Then
what will you say to that
diety?
I was simply pointing out that we do understand
what holds the earth in orbit, and that it is not the hand of some
diety.
Nobody can justly blame
diety for
what we choose.
We remember
what our grandparents told us and old news reels show of the winter of 1947 - 8, where snow lay on the ground for months, livestock starved in the fields if a helicopter couldn't get hay to them and we think «Thank (insert name of
diety) that hasn't happened this year».