As you gather your divorce support team, also begin to gather the financial records you will need so that you and your spouse can determine
what distribution of assets and debts is fair, or at least acceptable.
Not exact matches
Until,
of course, you remember the culture - induced myopia I described yesterday: Myerson still has the Ballmer-esque presumption that Microsoft controlled its own destiny and could have leveraged its
assets (like Office) to win the smartphone market, ignoring that by virtue
of being late Windows Phone was a product competing against ecosystems, which meant no consumer demand, which meant no developers, topped off by the arrogance to dictate to OEMs and carriers
what they could and could not do to the phone, destroying any chance at leveraging
distribution to get critical mass...
As we theorize normatively about the organization
of political life, and about the
distribution of socio - economic
assets, so we should also theorize about
what general shape our economy ought to take and about how our states ought to combine in shaping international economic forces.
Add up all the
assets in your name, subtract
what's owed, including tax, to calculate
what's available for
distribution under your will, says Sandra Foster, author
of the 6th edition
of You Can't Take It With You.
Thinking about
asset allocation,
what comes to my mind is the
distribution of different
asset classes in my portfolio: large - cap, small - cap, mid-cap, bonds, real estate, commodity, international, ect.
What is your approach to the
distribution of asset classes between your registered and non-registered accounts?
What fuels Algonquin's cash flows is its diversified portfolio
of rate - regulated
distribution utility and power - generation
assets.
What is a fair and just method
of distribution of an insolvent company's
assets amongst creditors if its
assets have been commingled into a single mixed bulk, and the proceeds are insufficient to satisfy every secured claim?
Mrs Vaughan contended that all
of that money (# 175,000) should be «factored back» into the pot
of assets and treated as still available for
distribution, with any doubt about the appropriate sum falling at the husband's door — he had spent the money, after all, and could give no sufficient account about
what had become
of it.
Under the divorce laws
of New Jersey, courts divide
assets based on
what it considers an «equitable» or fair
distribution.
The issue raised in these cases, is how to effect an equitable
distribution of matrimonial property and more importantly,
what jurisdiction Canadian courts have in dealing foreign
assets.
While the Court in Kiamanesh, felt it could achieve equity, pending the valuation
of the US company, by reapportioning all
of the Canadian
assets to the wife, this raises the question
of what Canadian courts can do to achieve an equitable
distribution of matrimonial property when the foreign
assets are worth more than the Canadian
assets?
Creating an estate
distribution plan is about determining who will get
what portion
of your
assets.
Until,
of course, you remember the culture - induced myopia I described yesterday: Myerson still has the Ballmer-esque presumption that Microsoft controlled its own destiny and could have leveraged its
assets (like Office) to win the smartphone market, ignoring that by virtue
of being late Windows Phone was a product competing against ecosystems, which meant no consumer demand, which meant no developers, topped off by the arrogance to dictate to OEMs and carriers
what they could and could not do to the phone, destroying any chance at leveraging
distribution to get critical mass...
The attorney will also negotiate
what is called equitable
distribution, which is
distribution of the
assets and liability
of the marriage.
Unlike in community property states — where courts evenly divide the
assets acquired during a marriage — equitable
distribution laws give a great deal
of latitude to judges to decide
what is «fair.»
The goal here is not to split
assets and debts directly down the middle and have Bob and Sally go their separate ways, the goal is to figure out
what is most unbiased and fair
distribution of property considering the circumstances.
When you bring in a neutral collaborative facilitator, who generally has a mental health background, you can cut through the clutter
of emotionally - charged issues and get to the heart
of what is important, such a parenting plan in which both spouses are heavily involved in the children's lives, or a
distribution of assets that permits both parties to be safe and secure in their future.
The purpose
of this post is to discuss
what Oregon divorce courts can do after divorce if an
asset was left out
of the
distribution.